Females who had more than 10 sexual partners increased their risk of cancer by 91%

Studies have confirmed that the more sexual partners women have, especially from the early stages at 17 years increase their risk of developing cervical cancer. Engaging with many sexual partners creates a sharp risk factor for the development of this cancer because a higher number of partners increases a person’s exposure to HPV. The virus is spread through skin-to-skin contact, and condoms cannot completely prevent HPV, so women should beware of their choices(Prof. Nyarkotey)

Studies have affirmed that women with a history of 10 or more lifetime sexual partners are linked to a sharp risk of being diagnosed with cancer. And among women, a higher number of sexual partners is also linked to sharp odds of reporting a limiting long-term condition, the findings indicate.

The study (Grabovac et al. 2020) investigated this possibility and enrolled about 2,500 men and 3,200 women who were 50 or older (average age 64). Each person was surveyed about the total number of sexual partners they’d had throughout their lives. This information was compared with several medical conditions they’d developed, including cancer, heart disease, and stroke.

The study demonstrated that:

• For women, those who reported 10 or more sexual partners in their life were nearly 91% more likely to have developed cancer when compared with those reporting 0 or 1 lifetime sexual partners.

Men were more likely than women to report having at least 10 partners (22% of men vs. 8% of women) while women were more likely to have fewer partners (41% of women and 28.5% of men reported having had 0 to 1 partner).

It’s worth noting this study was performed in England with health information initially collected in the late 1990s. The results could have been different if researchers had assessed the risk of a different population or at a different point in time. In addition, self-reporting was relied upon to assess sexual behavior, and no association was found.

Does this mean having sex leads to cancer?

The answer is almost surely no.

That’s because this type of study cannot assess whether sex causes cancer. It can only determine whether there is a correlation between the two. Also, we already know of ways that sexual behavior can indirectly affect cancer risk without actually causing cancer, especially through sexually transmitted infections( Dafina and Rocio, 2015). The American Sexual Health Association also confirmed this assertion on STDs and cancer risk.

Some of the strongest connections are for:

• Human papillomavirus (HPV), increases the risk of cancers of the cervix, mouth, penis, and anus(Araldi et al. 2018) by 30%.
• Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, increases the risk of cancers such as Kaposi’s sarcoma and lymphoma(Simard et al. 2010)
• Hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection, have been linked to liver cancer according to the American Cancer Society.
• Gonorrhea increases the risk of prostate cancer (particularly among African American men).

Previous studies

Few studies have looked at the potential impact of the number of sexual partners on wider health outcomes.

One study from Denmark(Campi et al. 2004) used 64 704 women who had children with at least two different partners from 1973 to 1996 and found overall cancer incidence was more than 50% higher in women with two or more partners. Women having children with multiple partners had a higher incidence of cancer of the cervix and corpus uteri, a lower incidence of melanoma but a similar incidence of breast and ovarian cancer. Uncontrolled differences in lifestyle factors may explain the higher cancer risk associated with having multiple partners. The strong protective effect of melanoma was unexpected and deserves further study.

In 2012-13, participants were asked how many sexual partners they had had. Complete data were provided by 5722 of the 7079 people who responded to this question: 2537 men and 3185 women. Responses were categorized as 0-1; 2-4; 5-9; and 10 or more sexual partners.

Participants were also asked to rate their health and report any long-standing condition or infirmity which impinged on routine activity in any way.

Other relevant information obtained included: age; ethnicity; marital status; household income other than a pension; lifestyle (smoking, drinking, physical activity); and presence of depressive symptoms.

The average age of participants was 64, and almost three out of four were married. Some 28.5% of men said they had had 0-1 sexual partners to date; 29% said they had had 2-4; one in five (20%) reported 5-9; while 22% reported 10 or more.

The equivalent figures for women were: just under 41%; 35.5%; just under 16%; and just under 8%.

In both sexes, a higher number of sexual partners was associated with younger age, single status, and being in the highest or lowest brackets of household wealth.

Those who reported a higher tally of sexual partners were also more likely to smoke, drink frequently, and do more vigorous physical activity every week.

When all the data were analyzed, a statistically significant association emerged between the number of lifetime sexual partners and the risk of a cancer diagnosis among both sexes.

Compared with women who reported 0-1 sexual partners, those who said they had had 10 or more, were 91% more likely to have been diagnosed with cancer.

Among the men, those who reported 2-4 lifetime sexual partners were 57% more likely to have been diagnosed with cancer than those who reported 0-1. And those who reported 10 or more, were 69% more likely to have been diagnosed with the disease.

While the number of sexual partners was not associated with reported long-standing conditions among the men, it was among the women.

Women who reported 5-9 or 10+ lifetime sexual partners were 64% more likely to have a limiting chronic condition than those who said they had had 0-1.

This is an observational study, and as such, can’t establish cause. Nevertheless, the findings ring with those of previous studies, implicating sexually transmitted infections in the development of several types of cancer and hepatitis, suggest the researchers.

They didn’t obtain information on the specific types of cancer participants reported, but speculate: “...the heightened risk of cancer might be driven by those types known to be associated with [sexually transmitted infections].”

And they suggest that enquiring about the number of sexual partners might complement existing cancer screening programs by helping to identify those at risk if further research can establish a causal association between the number of sexual partners and subsequent ill health.

But an explanation for the gender difference in long-term condition risk remains “elusive,” they write, especially given that men tend to have more lifetime sexual partners than women, while women are more likely than men to see a doctor when they feel ill, so potentially limiting the associated consequences for their long term health.

In Ghana, for instance, Opoku et al.(2016) found that 27% of cervical cancer patients were in polygamous relationships. A subsequent study from South Africa( Cooper et al. 2017) also established that cervical cancer risk is associated with increased sexual activity in young girls from 17 years. Hence, initiatives to encourage later commencement of sex, and limit the number of sexual partners would have a favorable impact on the risk of cancer of the cervix and other sexually transmitted infections.

Another recent study from Ethiopia(Mekuria et al. 2021) used 422 women and found that having multiple sexual partners, being Human Immune Deficiency Virus (HIV) positive, having an STI history and early initiation of sexual intercourse were factors associated with cervical cancer. Therefore, avoiding multiple sexual partners, delaying early sexual contact, and self-protection from STI infections might help to prevent cervical cancer.

Take Home

Studies have confirmed that the more sexual partners women have, especially from the early stages at 17 years increase their risk of developing cervical cancer. Engaging with many sexual partners creates a sharp risk factor for the development of this cancer because a higher number of partners increases a person’s exposure to HPV. The virus is spread through skin-to-skin contact, and condoms cannot completely prevent HPV, so women should beware of their choices.

NB:

Prof. Nyarkotey has strict sourcing guidelines and relies on peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical associations to justify his write-ups. My articles are for educational purposes and do not serve as Medical advice for Treatment. I aim to educate the public about evidence-based scientific Naturopathic Therapies.

The writer is a Professor of Naturopathic Healthcare, President, of Nyarkotey College of Holistic Medicine & Technology (NUCHMT)/African Naturopathic Foundation. E-mail: [email protected]. For more information, contact: Stephanie(PRO)on 0244433553

References

1. Rodrigo Pinheiro Araldia, Thalita Araujo Sant’Ana, Diego Grando Módolo, Thatian Correade MelocDiva Denelle Spadacci-Morenad Ritade Cassia StoccobJanete MariaCeruttiaEdislane Barreirosde Souza(2018) The human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancer biology: An overview. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Volume 106, October Pages 1537-1556
2. Edgar P Simard, Ruth M Pfeiffer ,Eric A. Engels(2010) Cumulative incidence of cancer among individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in the United States. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25547
3. Petrova Dafina and Garcia-Retamero Rocio, Effective Evidence-Based Programs For Preventing Sexually-Transmitted Infections: A Meta-Analysis, Current HIV Research 2015; 13(5) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570162X13666150511143943
4. Campi, R., Frydenberg, M., Basso, O. et al. Having children with different men and subsequent cancer risk. A nationwide study in Denmark. Br J Cancer 90, 1374–1377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601666
5. Opoku CA, Browne EN, Spangenberg K, Moyer C, Kolbilla D, Gold KJ. Perception and risk factors for cervical cancer among women in northern Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2016 Jun;50(2):84-9. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v50i2.6. PMID: 27635096; PMCID: PMC5012140.
6. Mekuria M, Edosa K, Endashaw M, Bala ET, Chaka EE, Deriba BS, Tesfa B. Prevalence of Cervical Cancer and Associated Factors Among Women Attended Cervical Cancer Screening Center at Gahandi Memorial Hospital, Ethiopia. Cancer Inform. 2021 Dec 22;20:11769351211068431. doi: 10.1177/11769351211068431. PMID: 34992337; PMCID: PMC8725021.
7. Cooper D, Hoffman M, Carrara H, Rosenberg L, Kelly J, Stander I, Denny L, Williamson AL, Shapiro S. Determinants of sexual activity and its relation to cervical cancer risk among South African women. BMC Public Health. 2007 Nov 27;7:341. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-341. PMID: 18042284; PMCID: PMC2228293.