Countrymen and women, loyalists and opponents, With the presentation of my state of the nation address, I have spelt out my plans for my second term on the Black Star Stool. I must warn you that things are not going to change much and so don't expect too much from me – otherwise, you will be sorely disappointed.
I must also point out that whether you like it or not, I am going to increase petroleum prices – unless something drastic happens to change my mind. To be forewarned is to be forearmed, so please brace yourselves up for a major shocker in the months ahead. Bear in mind that things have to get worse before they get better.
As I settle down to the real work of the excellent one, I have heard many of you debating/discussing the size of my government – that is the number of ministers of state who will be helping me to executive my responsibilities. I know that most of you will like to see the number of ministers reduced to the barest minimum to bring down cost and ensure efficiency as well as maximum productivity from each minister. I understand your concerns. In fact, I agree that I need just about twenty-five ministers of state. But certain circumstances beyond my control make it imperative for me to employ almost one hundred ministers and almost an equal number of deputies, who will in turn employ about two hundred special assistants.
First, there are so many men and women who have helped me to get to where I am. I am no superman, you know and there is very little I can do on my own. For example, I needed a lot of cash for my campaign for the elections which brought me to power. Much of it was provided by not-so well-meaning individuals who gave grudgingly in anticipation of good returns. There are others who worked like donkeys – traveling to far away places, sleeping in ditches and lying to the people for me – who must also be compensated. Simply put, I need to reward those who helped me to become the excellent one. And how do I do that? Well, I just appoint them as ministers of state. It doesn't matter whether they qualify or not. What matters is that I need to repay or reward them for what they've done for me. I never want anyone to call me an ingrate, you know. Appointing them as ministers gives them a measure of social recognition and they get to enjoy numerous luxuries, paid for by the state – free petrol, free electricity, free accommodation, free everything. Otanka is one such minister. He's just a position occupier – spending vital state resources for his personal gain and receiving social recognition as a minister for merely working so hard on my electoral campaigns.
Secondly, I have to appoint so many ministers because I just can't find people who are hardworking and qualified enough to supervise several different areas at the same time. You know I am considering creating an Aviation ministry. I don't know whether it will be a wise decision to establish an aviation ministry but I am being forced to do so. Under normal circumstances, aviation should be under transport. In fact, transport of any form – rail, mass transit, intercity, aviation etc. – should all fall under the Transport Ministry. But what is a president to do when his transport minister is indiscriminately using his 'langalanga', claiming that his indiscretions are benefiting the nation? I have no choice than to create separate ministries for rail and aviation. Why do we need a Minister for Tertiary Education when there is a Minister for Education? Why do we need a Minister of State at the Finance Ministry when there is a Finance Minister? The answer lies in the concept of “job for the boys” (and girls) as well the incompetence of our ministers.
Thirdly, in a country where ministers of state delight in delivering speeches, “commissioning” projects, attending useless functions and essentially wasting time, the president is compelled to appoint as many ministers as possible so that whiles some laze about, the work of government will not be brought to a standstill. If I appoint 25 ministers of state (my ideal number of ministers) and they all go about delivering boring speeches and wasting time, who will be left to work? The solution therefore is to appoint more ministers than necessary so that at least, we can get a few who can pretend to be working whiles others a busy showing the world that they are ministers.
As I've said, I think this country does not need more than twenty five ministers of state – ministers who will stay on top of things and work real hard to help any government achieve its policy objectives. We have very few people like this in the country and even fewer in my party. So please, for now, bear with me and understand why I need to appoint more ministers than necessary.
However, I will like you to criticize the ministers and say all sorts of unkind things about them for surrounding themselves with useless “special assistants”. These so-called special assistants' positions have been ingeniously created to provide more jobs for the smaller boys and girls. But I think it's high time the concept was rejected for the sake of common sense and cost-cutting. These special assistants are also living off the national kitty and increasing the cost of running the government.
I can also confirm to you that these “special assistants” are agents of immorality and corruption. You see, these ministers use their special assistants to transact their dirty businesses. Some special assistants serve as “go-betweeners” for the ministers and their concubines. Others have been coached in how to demand the “ten percent” kickbacks for the ministers. You see, the ministers don't want to be accused of directly demanding the kickbacks, so they like to use their special assistants. I have also been reliably informed that some ministers are keeping fat bank accounts in the names of their special assistants.
Mark my words – one day, a minister will be exposed. But for now, speak out and reject the “special assistants” and bear with me for appointing so many “useless” ministers.
J. A. Fukuor [email protected]