
The continuous incarceration of Mr Tsatsu Tsikata is a disturbing phenomenon and an affront to justice. Before I advance my argument further, let me make it abundantly clear that the issues raised in this piece are not about whether or not Mr Tsikata was or is guilty or innocent of the offences for which he was sentence to 5 years in prison on 18 June 2008. The guiltiness or innocence of Mr Tsikata is something I will prefer to leave to my legal friends and the courts to determine.
As a human rights and social justice campaigner 1 am seriously concern about the way the justice system in Ghana sometimes work. I have followed the case of Mr Tsikata keenly over the last 6 year in the Fast Track Court presided over by Mrs Justice Henrietta Abban; and the furore that followed the judgement and the sentence that was handed down; and strongly believe Tsatsu Tsikata deserves justice.
Any right thinking person with a conscience, without sounding offensive to anyone reading this article will frown upon the hastiness with which the trial judge Mrs Justice Abban delivered her verdict and sentence to Mr Tsikata.
Mr Tsikata, whether a legal guru or not, a President of Ghana or not has a fundamental right to a fair trial and that include exploring or exploiting all the options available to him in his defence in a case of which he has been accused of wilfully causing financial loss to the state and misappropriating public property. The argument advanced by the trial judge and some legal minds that Tsatsu was abusing the court process and hence the hastiness of judgement, smacks of justice and abuse of power. The trial judge in her summing up (I stand corrected) did not indicate or illustrate instances of Mr Tsikata's abuse of court process. Mr Tsikata was merely exercising his legal rights as enshrine in the constitution and therefore his hopping from one court to another in seeking justice cannot be misinterpreted as unnecessarily spinning the court process.
What really sent cold through my spine or tipped me to the edge of the Ghanaian judicial system and the injustice I felt and continue to feel in Tiskata's case, was with the trial judge's decision not to have adjourned proceedings but proceeded to deliver judgment when Tsikata's counsel was not in court. I have served in the jury and also observed serious criminal cases in courts in the UK and have never seen such a bazaar twist to legal or court proceeding like this. The trial proceedings on 18 June 2008 was not only grossly unfair, a disgrace to the Judiciary and the legal profession but also an infringement upon Tsikata's fundamental human rights. Justice therefore in the case of Tsatsu was not seen to be done. Ghana and Tsatsu Tsikata deserves better from our Judiciary.
David Atugiya
Chairman of UK Ghana Human Rights Committee


One dead, fire officer hospitalised after bee attack at Quarry Site in Sokode Gb...
Israel and Iran step back from further strikes after renewed clashes
Patients stranded as doctors, nurses refuse to see new patients over KATH CEO su...
Avenor Rural Bank CEO’s house destroyed by fire
Three arrested in Winneba for illegal mining near GWL water lines
Two pupils of Alice Elite Academy laid to rest after fatal school bus crash
Here are areas to be affected by ECG's planned maintenance on Tuesday
Family of civil engineer killed in alleged military shooting demands justice
SHS teacher allegedly beats female student over unpaid hostel fees
Blow to EU defence cooperation as France, Germany abandon joint fighter jet prog...

Comments
I totally disagree with the writer, Atiguba. He admits that the case had gone on for the past 6 yrs and all legal opportunities were availlable for him to explore. The said day 18th, June 2008 was the jugdement day. To further twist the legal process in his favour, the counsel of Tsatsu chose to travel out of the country. Now, the colorally is that, should the judgement had gone in Tsatsu's favour, would Atiguba have come out to tell us this? Would the absence of Tsatsu's counsel been a proble...