Tools Over Words, for Children and Beyond

Too many American mediahouses are talking about the ad in Ohio in the wrong way, and ignoring the accusation song in Maine and other imaginative scenarios. True love may include words, but I want more than words from God and the Godly. Rather than endless debates on which ads are ok or crossing the lines, let each candidate tell us which tools, not words, they may offer to children and beyond. U.S politicians are so questionable that you have to pray to God very hard to help you know who to choose. I honestly do not favor any of the candidates, but I have ways I favor, and those who support such ways are the ones worthy of trying. Besides education, I prefer actions (tools) over words...

Which candidates for governor , senate, etc support the strongest culture of cameras and other tools to deter and catch sexual predators and sexual liars matter. Of course cameras and the other tools I envisioned can do much more than sexual matters, but America seems to care about sex most and often in one way. Which candidates will offer tax breaks or xyz for body cameras is just one of the tools. Like I mentioned in one of my recent articles, the BBC and others are wrongly labelling it ‘pervert glasses’, but we should call them ‘deterrence glasses’, evidence glasses, proactive glasses or belts+ , etc. When over 90% of the public walk+ with body cameras, we will have a higher level of deterrence and easier evidence based conclusions.

Other Tools: There are small gadgets, around the size of a thumbnail, that can record audio for a decade. You can put it in children's or teenagers’ rooms, but please do not mention African or xyz offices, because that may catch terrible politicians. I mean the questionable politicians may oppose such gadgets in Children's rooms, forwarding excuses because they understand a strong culture of such will lead to having them in their offices, our pockets, and beyond. If such a gadget was in the room of the female candidate for Ohio governorship, a smart or caring mother will do better than blind trust, but investigate without the knowledge of the child. No! I am actually saying if she is truly against sexual abuse, then she should strongly support such tools beyond Ohio. We must ask her what tools she believes may help present children and teenagers in and beyond sexual crimes. The focus cannot be on her or then, but how do we help potential victims in and beyond Ohio, but worldwide. I believe the audio recording gadgets should be even in our bedrooms, but the video oriented cameras should be everywhere except the bedroom. Even children and teenagers should have multiple body cameras and governments or NGOs must try to facilitate such worldwide.

If we deny them such tools , or cowardly call them ‘intrusion of privacy ‘, then we are just gambling some to be victims of individuals and gambling others to be victims of governments. Men do suffer through lying women+ and no one will deny countless women suffer sexual ‘abuse’. Although I expect her and other females to be urging for such a strong culture of cameras, we can ask the male candidate what he is willing to offer potential victims. If both candidates support a strong culture of cameras and these special tools, then that is a public win and we gauge them on other matters.

A political ad can be factual, false, or simply gray. I think the ad in Ohio is certainly on the gray line. If I was running against her, I will not be taking down the ad, because it may be factual. If I was running against him, I would have attacked the ad factually and present ads like ‘tools over words’ to win votes. It is unfortunate that almost every ad can win votes, but such an ad cannot make me vote for him, vote against him, vote for her, or vote against her. We all know she could have been lying or telling the truth, but how much she cares or both care about tools that may help children+ is what can win my vote.

Taking down the ad is almost suicidal and other groups can then run the ad. Taking down the ad means the mum is not to be trusted and why? Claiming the mother is not well then or now is a very weak claim. Of course, if your mum disbelieved you in a factual claim, me and you will be angry, but I will not totally abandoned my parents over disbelieved, but embrace blessings like strong culture of cameras and smart tools, study why she and others disbelieved her or her type, encourage all parents towards such tools in smart ways rather than believing their guts or assumptions. Our generation sadly fears great blessings like cameras, because we sadly put human ‘intelligence’ above truth.

The Maine Irony: The daily show just showed a song where a male candidate is accused of having sex with a cousin. Again, such ads cannot move me, but how do we handle things when the accused is a male versus female, when the ad is by the candidates versus supporters of candidates? At the end, voters are hearing or seeing the same thing. I am not even sure if the song is real or just an imagination. It does seem like a real song, an attack ad, but America is not condemning it like the Ohio ad, even though it could be a lie. Maine and every state must have candidates who support a strong culture of cameras and smart tools. Support such with tax breaks, urgings, more research, etc.

‘I am a victim of sexual abuse, but refused tools that may help potential victims’ is cowardly or much worse. ‘I am a victim of false allegations, but cannot see my right to gather evidence in public places or my house’ is wilfully blind or under-fighting the assumption oriented devils. ‘I am the candidate that opposes sexual violence with tools, not just words; I am the candidate who support tools against liars, especially in public places. The right to gather evidence is a God given right for our generation, so do not let any state take it from you. S/he claims to be a victim, but I am the one ready to help millions of victims and potential victims, help them with tools, not just words… I support a strong culture of cameras through xyz policies….

I am not saying past wrongs are irrelevant, but how we confront present and potential future wrongs should matter much more. At least 25% of u.s female candidates claim to be victims of sexual abuse, but offer nothing special except more punishment and blind trust. We can claim all or 90% of politicians do lie for votes, but not female candidates on sexual matters? I am not interested in a long debate of who is lying or not, but who is ready to confront liars with smart tools, including females. No more blind trust and may God curse those who want us to continue on the route of blind trust. In regards to care for children, which candidates support mandatory education for children up to age 18 or 20? That can also help more people to think and demand better than smear oriented ads. Tell us your programs and which tools you have to offer in which ways? Will you support fine sharing to encourage civilian mass participation in culture of cameras and other smart gadgets to catch real criminals? Besides giving me 25% of the fine as restitution for wearing a smart-glass that helps her, we should split her victim's reward if she refused body cameras. Such is not just to reward me and you, but encourage all to join 'team evidence' above team Democrats or Republicans. How about if I save a man from a lying woman? Also can you enter me and others in a special lottery if my body cameras helped solve a crime? If all rewards above hundred thousand or million dollars should have 25% deducted towards a special NGO or institution for the poor, a big lottery for team cameras, etc… The so-called victims of Epstein, Diddy, Cosby, etc are enjoying their money, but if we took 25% or more from that money and buy body cameras and other smart gadgets for poor teenagers can certainly help more than the claim me and millions of men will automatically fear due to punishments based on assumptions? They believe in rewarding women and punishing men based on assumptions, but I want us to move towards empowering all through education, empowering through evidence based tools, and building a much better world. Which candidates will support mandatory or strategic voluntary encouragement of cameras in all vehicles? These things matter much more than questionable ads or taking down ads that may be factual… Candidates who support Trump are largely terrible, but the Democrats are also terrible on sexual matters and censorship. Do not remind me of the extreme censorship of Trump, because that cannot exonerate the democrats on censorship. Both parties need to repent, but the mainstream media wants us to discuss ads in one-way. Mainstream media is yet to embrace or urge for a strong culture of cameras towards evidence based society. Step parents and step children do suffer sometimes and such gadgets may save many innocent people. Running away may not help, but urge for worldwide culture of evidence based societies. Words are mainly for learning purposes, not fun. At least 25% to 50% of so-called empathy are hypocritical, and because we failed to demand or accept great tools+. The u.s and other rich nations were supposed to be donating cameras+ more than vaccines and weapons, but they are dragging their feet for even themselves. It is so shameful and dangerous to see u.s protesters using cellular phones to record crimes. It is super shameful that Florida bans the recording of even abusive cops, but the democrats are too dumb to urge mass buying of body cameras and challenging such unjust laws? Even Obama was sadly praising cellular phone recording and yet to urge the importance of embracing body cameras for civilians. May God bless Showlove Trinity: let's learn, let's work, let's have fun.

By Jarga Kebba Gigo
An Activist and Transformer
Author of Juts Quhr-aahn