body-container-line-1

When A Ghanaian Politician Wants To Meet You, He Makes Time. When You Need Him, He Is Unavailable

Feature Article When A Ghanaian Politician Wants To Meet You, He Makes Time. When You Need Him, He Is Unavailable
THU, 15 OCT 2026

There's a concerning trend in our political culture that really needs our attention. When a Ghanaian politician wants to meet with you, they suddenly become incredibly available. They'll call you, send someone to track you down, and do whatever it takes to make that meeting happen. But flip the script, and when you’re the one trying to meet with that same politician, everything changes. Suddenly, their schedule is packed, their phone seems to be off, and getting an appointment feels like an uphill battle.

So, why is it that accessibility is a breeze when a politician needs something from you, but turns into a major hurdle when you need something from them?

This contradiction is a source of frustration for many Ghanaians regarding the relationship between politicians and the citizens they’re meant to serve. Leading up to elections, politicians are everywhere. They show up at funerals, visit neighborhoods, shake hands with market vendors, hug children, sit down with traditional leaders, and make themselves available to anyone willing to hear their promises. During these times, they grasp the importance of personal connections, public engagement, and being approachable.

They know that a simple conversation can win over support, a handshake can build goodwill, and a personal visit can boost their political standing.

But once they’ve secured their political power, that same accessibility often vanishes. The person who used to call you repeatedly for your help may suddenly become hard to reach.

The politician who once treated your calls as urgent might now overlook them. The individual who made you feel valued may start acting like granting you a few minutes of their time is a huge favor.

What happened? Did the politician suddenly become more important than the very people who helped them get there, or have they just forgotten the significance of the relationships they built?

It's important to remember that not every politician acts this way. Public officials juggle hectic schedules, various responsibilities, security issues, and valid reasons for not being able to meet everyone who asks for an appointment. Being in public office doesn’t mean they’re on call 24/7. However, there’s a big difference between being genuinely busy and consistently shutting people out when their needs don’t match up with your own priorities.

The real concern isn’t whether a politician can meet with everyone who wants to talk. That’s just not realistic. The real question is whether they’ve set up a fair, respectful, and dependable way for people to reach out, ask for help, share ideas, and voice their concerns.

A responsible public official doesn’t have to say yes to every request, but it’s crucial that people don’t feel like their worth hinges on the convenience of the person they elected or supported.

Sadly, political relationships can sometimes feel more like transactions. When a politician needs your influence, connections, expertise, media backing, financial help, or assistance in reaching a specific audience, you suddenly become important. Your calls get answered, your messages are acknowledged, and your availability is valued.

But when you’re the one in need of the politician’s help, the dynamic can shift dramatically. You might find yourself sending messages that go unanswered, waiting indefinitely for an appointment, or making repeated attempts to connect, only to realize that the person who once valued your input now seems to have no time for you.

It’s disheartening to think that some political relationships are valued solely for what one side can gain from the other.

This brings up a crucial point about reciprocity. Why should a politician expect loyalty, cooperation, and even personal sacrifices from people if he’s not willing to show them basic consideration when they need his attention?

Public service shouldn’t be about politicians having easy access to citizens while those citizens have to jump through hoops just to reach them. The relationship should be grounded in mutual respect, even if the roles and responsibilities of each side differ.

Politicians also need to realize that the folks who come to them aren’t always after money or personal favors. Some have great policy ideas that could really help their communities. Others might have insights that could enhance public services. Some just want to report an issue, seek advice, discuss an opportunity, or simply chat about something that’s impacting their lives.

When politicians shut themselves off, they risk missing out on valuable ideas, useful information, and chances to truly understand the challenges everyday people face.

There’s also a lesson here for those who support politicians. We need to be able to tell the difference between true friendship and political convenience. If someone only reaches out when they need something from you, they might not value the relationship as much as you do. If they remember your number when they need support but forget how to contact you when you want to talk, it’s time to reassess that relationship honestly.

Political loyalty shouldn’t mean sacrificing your self-respect. Supporting a politician doesn’t mean giving up your dignity, and helping someone get into office shouldn’t turn you into someone who’s always waiting for their attention.

We really need to stop equating closeness to political power with personal significance. In certain circles, there's this competition to show off just how tight they are with ministers, Members of Parliament, presidential appointees, party leaders, and other big shots. They flaunt photos, phone calls, invitations, and the occasional meet-up as if these things automatically mean they have meaningful connections.

But the real test of a relationship often comes to light when there’s nothing to gain from it right away.

Can that politician still recognize you when they don’t need your help? Will they respond with respect when you disagree? Can they take the time to explain why they can’t fulfill your request instead of leaving you hanging? Can they treat you with kindness even when you have nothing to offer them politically?

These questions are crucial because holding public office shouldn’t turn basic human courtesy into a privilege only for the powerful.

At the same time, citizens need to understand that just because they can access a politician doesn’t mean they’re entitled to a specific outcome. Asking for a meeting doesn’t guarantee it will happen, and getting an appointment doesn’t mean the politician has to agree with everything you say. What citizens should expect is a system that prioritizes communication, transparency, and respect.

Political maturity means both sides need to grasp these boundaries. Politicians should recognize their duty to stay accessible, while citizens should be aware of the practical limits of public office.

In the end, a politician’s worth shouldn’t be measured by how many people he can pull into his office, but by how responsibly he interacts with those who seek his attention. His significance shouldn’t hinge on how hard it is to reach him, and his influence shouldn’t come at the cost of making others feel small.

It's quite ironic that some politicians invest so much time in building relationships, chasing endorsements, asking for help, and trying to earn people's trust. Yet, once they finally achieve the influence they were after, they sometimes act in ways that undermine those very connections.

They seem to forget that influence is fleeting, political landscapes shift, and the folks they overlook today might just be the same ones whose support, knowledge, or collaboration they’ll desperately need tomorrow.

The takeaway here isn’t that all politicians are arrogant or that every missed call is a sign of disrespect. Instead, it’s a reminder that public service demands a steady commitment to treating people with respect, regardless of whether there’s an immediate payoff.

If a politician can carve out time for you when they need something, they should at least make a genuine effort to reach out when you’re in need. They might not always be able to fulfill your request, but they shouldn’t make you feel like your value hinges on your usefulness.

A politician’s true character shines through not just in how they treat people when they’re seeking help, but also in how they respond when those same people are looking for their attention.

That’s a lesson our political leaders, their supporters, and the general public would do well to keep in mind.

Sulley Kone
Sulley Kone, © 2026

Columnist and Socio-Political CommentatorColumn: Sulley Kone

Disclaimer: "The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect ModernGhana official position. ModernGhana will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements in the contributions or columns here." Follow our WhatsApp channel for meaningful stories picked for your day.

Just in....
body-container-line