Tired of being ‘conned’ by the Parties? Here are the facts
Topline: ‘States led by a Democrat governor (or mayor in Washington DC) generally feature lower fertility, higher LGBTQ+ populations, higher grocery and gas prices, and are significantly more likely to mandate reusable grocery bags. Those jurisdictions also having Democrat legislatures (trifectas), enforce Democrat agendas even more.’
| Metric (mean across states) | Solid Democrat (17 states) | Solid Republican (23 states) | Partisan Gap / Structural Reality |
| Cost of Living Index | 123.8 | 89.5 | Solid blue states are 34.3% more expensive to live in than solid red states. |
| Median Household Income | $91,400 | $68,950 | Nominal incomes are $22,450 higher in solid blue states, offsetting baseline costs. |
| Real Disposable Income | $67,800 | $72,300 | Red trifectas yield roughly $4,500 more in actual local purchasing power. |
| Regulatory Freedom (CATO 100 = best) | 42.9 | 69.8 | Red states carry a significantly lighter compliance, zoning, and labor burden (e.g., fewer bureaucrats). |
| State Debt per Capita | $11,840 | $3,280 | Solid blue states carry 3.6 times more debt per resident than solid red states. (Living there means being partially ‘on-the-hook’ for that debt) |
| LGBTs | 7.4% | 4.6% | Solid blue states have 60.9% more LGBTs. |
| Metric (mean across states) | Democrat Governor** | Republican Governor | Democrat Trifectas | Republican Trifectas |
| Jurisdictions | 25 (24 states + DC) | 26 states | 17 (16 states + DC) | 23 states |
| Total Fertility Rate (TFR) / General Rate | Lower (~1.4–1.5 TFR / ~49.5 births per 1k women) | Higher (~1.7–1.8 TFR / ~57.2 births per 1k women) | Lowest (~1.4 TFR / ~48.2 births per 1k women) | Highest (~1.8 TFR / ~59.1 births per 1k women) |
| % LGBTs | Higher (~6.8%) | Lower (~4.8%) | Highest (~7.4%) | Lowest (~4.6%) |
| Ground Beef (per lb) | Higher (~$7.80 – $8.40) | Lower (~$6.89 – $7.30) | Highest (~$8.10 – $8.45) | Lowest (~$6.85 – $7.15) |
| Avocado (each) | Higher (~$1.10 – $1.25) | Lower (~$0.85 – $0.95) | Highest (~$1.15 – $1.30) | Lowest (~$0.80 – $0.90) |
| Regular Gas (per gal) | Higher (~$4.85) | Lower (~$4.05) | Highest (~$5.10) | Lowest (~$3.95) |
| Bring your own bag laws | Yes (in 13 states) | None (0 states) | Yes (in 12 states) | None (0 states) |
*As summarized by prompts to Google’s Gemini AI as of October 2026
**Includes Washington DC, led by a Democrat mayor
Upshot:
- Democrat-led states are more apt to tell you (or your business) how you must do things (e.g., bring your own shopping bags or pay extra for plastic) and with whom you must associate or who you must hire. ‘Civil rights’ laws limit freedom of association when it comes to whom you may serve or sell your products.
- Democrat-led states are more apt to decree what books must be in your children’s libraries and to what kinds of teachers and curricula your kids must be exposed. They reduce your purchasing power by enacting laws and regulations that raise your cost of groceries and gas.
- Democrat-led jurisdictions are the least friendly for having children. They have the lowest TFRs and the highest proportions of LGBTs. There is a robust negative relationship between TFR and the extent of LGBT presence (i.e., the lower the TFR, the higher the proportion of LGBTs, and vice-versa). Washington DC has the highest LGBT density [14.5%] of any city in the world, and lowest TFR [1.11] of large U.S. cities.
Party or Candidate?
- The Democrat Party is the party of change. They may promise more ‘affordability’ and a fairer society, but the proof is in the state ‘puddings’ they govern. Have those changes been good for you or your fellow citizens? While individual candidates may be more winsome or loathsome, almost all will vote with their party. These AI-summarized comparisons suggest that voting for the party that best represents your desires, and cheering (or holding your nose) for its candidate, will best influence society in your direction.
- “Germany, … the United States, United Kingdom, and other rich democracies … [have a] new elite: parties of the left like the American Democrats, British Labour, and the German Social Democrats … [are] increasingly dominated not by the working class they claim to serve, but by educated professionals living in cosmopolitan urban centers. These elites …[espouse] egalitarian policy views, but … [a] huge social gap … [exists] between themselves and their less-educated peers living outside of big cities. The de-industrialization brought on by a globalizing economy and neo-liberal policies exacerbate … this cleavage, with heartland jobs being outsourced or replaced by a service sector requiring a different type of education and skills.” – Francis Fukuyama, Persuasion, 10/6/2026.



'Mahama will not sack appointees based on NPP’s claims' – Shamima Muslim
UK king calls slavery 'monstrous injustice' as PM mulls apology
Auditor to audit Auditor-General’s accounts
Minority MPs walk out after Bagbin orders Abu Jinapor out of Parliament
NPP's Kwadwo Poku calls for more TraffiTech-GH cameras at road intersections to ...
Bawumia eyes 3R's Japanese tech that removes mercury, cleans soil and recycles w...
'Our borders must command respect' – Osahen Afenyo-Markin on cocaine busts
‘Govt deeply involved in Beirut cocaine bust’ — Kofi Bentil reveals
Ablakwa sues Benghazi, Media General over Fantana affair, corruption allegations
Mahama instructs Finance Ministry to pay striking JUSAG members from November
