Is 'Apologist' to Sexists what 'Nigger' was to Racists?

Racism and Sexism have many things in common than arrogant supremacy based on misunderstood God's choice, but their play book (how) means of suppressing the truth have similarities. Twisted name calling to anger opponents or have others silent a legitimate concern is a dangerous tactic. The word Nigger is twisted or taken from the well meant Spanish 'Negre' to mean 'stupid blacks', because the cruel believed all blacks were stupid, not just some blacks who may evolve? What do such call stupid whites or xyz, or such do not exist? The word 'apologist' is twisted or taken from English 'apology' to rightly mean one who apologises for a legitimate wrong, but the sexists use it one way to mean 'stupid' and largely against one gender, males? So when, how, and why is apologist used and to who?

A language can partially evolve or devolve, depending on how the linguists accept new definitions, blindly or with consistency? One of the advantages of the Spanish language over English is consistency, explicitly in reading and implicitly in branching offs. When you allow questionable people to introduce a term call 'feminism' and define it inconsistently from tribalism, racism, nationalism, etc then 'ism' is no longer consistent, it is blindly bowing on exceptionalism or privilege, to a group with similar advantages? 'Feminine' has nothing to do with males, 'ism' is distinctive, so 'feminism' was consistently supposed to mean a female sexist or female supremacy, which some men believe in; similar to how some blacks believed or still believe in white supremacy, total supremacy or partial supremacy?

So when some men identify as 'feminists' or call you 'apologist', just see them as the new house negro, the blind toadies. Is there a term for those who wrongly 'defend' cruel or lying women? I will never use 'bad female apologist', because apology never meant 'defending' until recently twisted through 'apologist'. Apology has always been closer to submitting than defending, to humility than arrogant, etc. So when the arrogant falsely accuse you and call any questioner for truth an 'apologist', they are simply falsely re-accusing you of defending wrongs and labelling you 'stupid' for asking questions?

Rape and 'domestic violence' are gross crimes that affect females than males, and the term 'apologists' has wrongly been used to mean one who defends rape or domestic violence, even where one was just asking questions or demanding evidence. The truth remains female commit the most domestic violence, but to children, especially in Africa, who taught the world to evolve or devolve? Did they learn it from males or karma from mindset is speciously irrelevant. Our task should be to fight evil and not just for gender. Very few female can rape a man, they can only 'rape' mentally or to boys. So physical rape by females is almost impossible, plus the term rape originally meant physical.

Similar to slavery largely meant physical, but mental slavery arguably existed before physical slavery, and the term modern day slavery will seem very insulting to those who went through real physical slavery. We can invent words or consistently twist words, but inconsistent twisting is very dangerous. Similarly, domestic violence largely meant physical, which a small percentage of women can do to men and some societies not only blame such men, but may re-punish them? Since we now claim 'domestic violence' can be mental or emotional, the 'can' is almost equal between the genders.

He can scream like thunder, she can scream like lightening, and both can be deadly? Talkers will debate which one is worse, but the good or best want to erase even the bad with culture of cameras, an evolution from Depp vs Heard audio tapes and pictures? Did you know some sound frequency drive some animals crazy (repellents), some sound frequency affect teenagers than adults, so is there sound frequencies that affect one gender than the other? Both men and women must be taught to control emotions, and studied on how we react to stupidity versus cruelty/lying?

Remember many racists thought stupidity is worse than cruelty, or could not see Arab or white cruelty? Some saw it as blessing or honor, just as some people or cultures lie for females? Arab culture encouraged slavery until Islam gradually under rescued countless blacks? White culture and white government supported slavery lot more than white religion or Christianity. This does not mean hypocritical Christians did not use a ship named 'Jesus' to haul slaves, use the worst part of the bible to justify slavery? The fact remains the whites who opposed slavery most were also religious and sometimes fought against their lives than some blacks.

My point is Religion is consistently better than culture and our old to modern government on fighting both racism and sexism. If you look at the females who fight for male rights or admit millions of women are capable of lying and/or cruelty, they are largely religious females than conscientious secular minds who wait for cameras+. Likewise, the hypocritical Muslims lean more on so called hadiths or questionable sayings to justify many gender based wrongs to largely oppress women, but sometimes to further worship women. Many of such sayings oppose many Koranic positions and the conscience God demands we improve to be successful, as per ch.91.

Ch.49:13 of the Koran essentially tells us our race, gender, tribes, nationalities are speciously for testing purpose, our personal than group leaning character matters more. Is there a race or gender that does not have millions of stupid ones, lying or cruel ones, and how we consistently deal with our guilty ones versus our 'opponent' race or gender? In the same chapter, it talks about how some assumptions can be sin, then name calling was also condemned. After knowing this chapter and seeing real life, how can one assume any man accused of rape, sexual assault, or domestic violence should be punished with due denials even before any evidence? When you call us names like 'apologist' for questioning a claimant, confronting a partial culprit like Amber Heard, or confronting the guilty system and approaches, then folks like me will laugh where you want us angry, but may imprecate to the God of man and woman, the God of Religion and the universe.

When we write truthful sentences you cannot confront with your lies or preferred desires, then accuse us of being 'stupid' or defending cruelty ( 'apologist'), we believe false accusers should get 50 or xyz to 80 percent of the penalty they accuse the innocent of. We are not going to just human jurors and judges, but to a just God who made us all. Those who defend the lying men and women after clear evidence must be in denial, they are the sexists and count how many verses say 'woe to the deniers of truth'. If they double down with false accusations, pray against them and exhort them to truth and patience on words+ as per ch.103.

Deviation on words or definition is a gross wrong, but deviation from due process is even worse. An accused person have always been presumed innocent until the accuser(s) and investigators can show sufficient evidence, or we acquit and defer to God. Why do we have to abandon this process to appease the worst of one gender+? A guilty person is bad, but a guilty society that hurts an innocent person is worse, and how can the atheists, hypocrites, and money worshippers be told deferring to God is smart at times? A weak culture of cameras helped both Amber Heard and Johny Depp, so a much stronger culture of cameras will help the poor men and women, except some terrible judges, journalists, and politicians exist. Coincidence occur for testing purpose.

A fifteen year old girl coincidently recorded a Texan man groping her on an Aeroplane, that authorities refuse to force to have enough culture of cameras. The airline can punish an accused person without evidence or be punished by guilty lobbying groups? No poor man can sue the airline in a commercialized human judiciary? The terrible judge gave the brave and smart girl only $363 as restitution versus the millions to Amber Heard, johny Depp and questionable victims of Bill Cosby, Epstein, R kelly, etc? What is so hard in creating a law that allows 15 to 50% of all sexual punitive damages/restitutions of over hundred thousand dollars to go to a special funding agency to fund culture of cameras, increase restitution to victims whose culprits are poor, prison cost, etc? Taking few thousands from Johnny Depp's dues to such a girl should not offend Ms. Heard and can help than her one sided story some dubbed speaking out? Acting out is much better than speaking out, and cameras are friends of the truthful than the cowards who claim to be intelligent and accuse the truthful of being stupid, cruel, or defending cruelty. Please do not accuse me or my God of being an 'apologist' through inspiring action based suggestions that may change some opponents?

Beside the judge, the lying mainstream media gave the brave girl one to five percent covering and the guilty verdict against Amber Heard is cowardly claimed will make us doubt a teenager or xyz using her phone as recorder, because her government refuse to buy her body cameras? Her government enjoys harming and gambling men than helping women, or good women? Her government refuses to shift few billions from the department of offence as subsidy towards culture of cameras beyond America? Names mean little, time and actions reveal lot more. Some weapons are for assault, not defence, but domestic terrorists may disagree; the defence department is also an over funded offence department until Ukraine demanded offensive weapons?

A U.S president said every dime to a questionable department may be from the food table, but may be from the camera blessing to confront police brutality, groping, false accusers, etc. Percentage matters, I am not about the misunderstood 'defunding' of police, but strongly for 'balanced shift funding' on prevention than questionable cure and culture of obsession with punishment as the remedy. Men can be self-taught or gently taught; Cameras will help another fraction, but which gender(s) trust in claims than cameras and accuse a fraction is too small a progress or will scare the 'Amber Heards'? The judge who under-rewarded the teenager, gave 20 months to a groping man on camera, and how many years to some marijuana guys? Did you know racist whites and sexist females with their sexist males tend to oppose marijuana legalization more? The victims are largely males and blacks, the culprits and supporters of the culprits are largely what?

The circumspect six of what, when, how, who, when, and why matter! Check when and how they used the term 'apologist' before you allow them to be sexist jurors in a gender sensitive case. Calling a black person nigger without evidence s/he is among the stupid blacks is lying and allowing such as juror in a race case is what? Calling someone an apologist or defending gender based cruelty without evidence warrants at least caution? 'Let's investigate before we punish' or While investigating with questions, how can you accuse me of defending cruelty? May God deny job opportunities and/or heaven those who think men should be punished based on mere accusations? Invest in cameras and do not quickly release them until society claims her mere claims are more valuable than your claims? Sue, boy cut, girl-cut, and imprecate against all companies who want to be judges based on claims, not evidence. Tell them a man is born, he loves even green and pink girls, happens to be black and conscientious Muslim/believer. May God bless Showlove Trinity: let's learn, let's work, let's have fun.

By Jarga Kebba Gigo

An Activist and Transformer

Twitter: jarga-k-gigo@jarg-k-gigo

Note: The guilty Elite abuse the poor at different levels, but the poor are sometimes partly to blame. Amber Heard's original article did not verifiably helped poor women, it added fear that men are abusive where one was also a victim, it sent the message to cowardly speak out, not act out, even with evidence, and perhaps she feared he would have fought back with evidence. If we push hard enough , government will act or a real victim will donate millions towards a culture of cameras and publicly urge others who truly care. Even child support was suppose to be as I hinted, but we have extremely wrong greedy adult support, where we could have smartly supported orphans before they claim it make poor minorities make too much babies. We can always set a cap to prevent questionable poor women against baby gambling. Our responsibilities to children far outweighs our responsibilities to women, and the devils are misleading the worst of women+. We cannot be good or bad based on God's imposed choices like gender or race. Satan made the fallacy of being made of fire means superiority; some whites+ claim skin color make them supreme; some women+ think booky (female private part) is priceless and peny (dick) means nothing in which languages and cultures? The Gradual defeat the racists suffered is for the sexists to learn or face a swift or gradual defeat. Life is about choices than visible human power, God truly exist and will act lot more if engaged rightly.

We demand more sincere repentance from government and companies, or God's curse be upon them than Amber Heard and her defiant supporters. The days of abuse must be over, and we are working precisely towards that than our opponents. We are calling for culture of cameras than they are, and should consider crowd funding for such. Urging folks like Johnny Depp to consider how he can help poor folks who are falsely accused can make him act or others much better than him to act. Cameras will reduce child abuse and improve parenting. Government can mass record us, target few, but cannot detail and abuse the masses through human judges. Few minor embarrassing moments will prompt learning and debate what is tolerable reaction than public backlash. Hackers will target rich folks with high security for more jobs and cowards must learn to be good as the politicians and bankers with culture of cameras. Public space and private places cannot be the same. The future demands we meet in public places with cameras, except someone you truly trust and want to be privately with limited or no home cameras. Telling a potential attacker that you already alerted a family or friend that you are on a first date, to check on you within minutes, hours or days mean if s/he kills you, the outside cameras will hunt him or her down. We all must sacrifice, not just government; we must brave up, not gamble one gender or the children based on questionable trust, where evidence matter.

They use the worst of patriarchies to claim men should never rule again, ignoring the heinous crimes of many matriarchs then and now. The system matters more than who steers the executive branch, so we must demand system change and never be told to pay for the sins of other men. I do not care about how many millions of men+ are guilty of lying and cruelty, except to co-hunt them reasonably, but I have to cater if I or my nephews are ever accused by one of the millions of lying women. Do not ask me why a man or woman may lie against anyone, go ask them why they lie, then you may understand evil is not exclusive to any gender.

Memories exist to question us or help us understand where to stand. Today, I remembered three questionable Africans in the U.S. first: An Arab African woman and co-worker, who was much older than me, told me the fairly small husband always beat her. I could not remember seeing marks on her, but beatings does not always leave marks. Why she didn't tell the U.S police, told a poor me and how many co-workers? I was too dumb to advise her and will not blame myself, where she may be a real or partial victim. Second: A Tiny African male professor used to come with body marks to a store I worked and claimed the wife always beat him.

Again, too poor and dumb to help much then. If he reported, U.S law may actually arrest him, instead of her. His students see the marks regularly and may just be like me, should not self blame. Third was a post that triggered someone labeling me an 'apologist', and the post was: My bonus: Almost every divorce was fueled by fear, greed, and/or arrogance by one or both parties; and may resurface after divorce. You cannot assume how others may react, nor how God may re-judge. S/he said, 'leave the children with me and you do not have to pay child support'? But the roots of evil whispered: you can get both? So the courts may decide after robbing both, or you can steal the children to a different continent and expect what level of support? Pray and work for character before the marriage, during, and /or after... plus the link to my article: 'Heard vs Depp: A guilty woman in a guiltier society?' The fact is some countries like U.S may have charged her type with 'kidnapping our citizen', welcome her as 'kidnapping or rescuing others' citizens', but what will God charge her with versus him? Consistency matters and hope God loves consistency than Russia, U.S, Saudi Arabia, etc.

The other memory that often comes to my mind is an extremely pretty white girl who also had a sad face, claimed she was a sexual victim of her own father, smoked cigarette a lot. She is likely a victim I could not have helped. My age and maturity was too low to offer meaningful empathy, much more truthful advice or dating her to success. Have to thank God for not asking her out and pray that I never commit or support what brought extreme sadness to many people.

Bad cultures and systems exist. U.S may have some good systems, but also multiple bad systems they refuse to confront with meaningful efforts and then blame people than systems? How many U.S citizens still blame Trump supporters for 2016 election? We got bad Trump due to worse Clinton and worst system? Where is ms. Clinton, Obama, etc on culture of cameras and imagine if ms. Heard had the evidence of Depp? They will voluntarily speak out loud based on gender, whisper with excuses, or wait to be asked? Gun system, electoral political system, gender judiciary system, etc demand humble learning, brave confrontation, and contentment over greed. Satan reportedly refused to apologise, Adam apologised how late, and was one accused of being an 'apologist'? Do not take the route of Arrogance, especially based on God's choice; nor the route of lying, it can be worse than cruelty; nor the route of tempt and indifference, but don't serve...