
Introduction
In a leading newspaper in the United States of America, a former US President is reported to have made the following assertion:
● "...The BASIS of each respective party HAVE become more ideological."
With all humility, LANGUAGE AGENDA observes that while the statement carries a quantum of presidential honor, it contains an error of concord.
Explanation and Justification
The subject of the sentence is the noun "basis", which is singular. However, it is forced to agree with the plural auxiliary verb "have." This is a clear violation of the Rule of Concord. According to this rule, singular subjects agree with singular verbs, and plural subjects agree with plural verbs.
Correction
It is instructive to mention that the "s" at the end of "BASIS" does not indicate the plurality of the word. Rather, "E" in place of "I" is the sole determiner of the plurality of "BASIS." In other words, the plural form of "basIs" is "basEs." Similar words are:
● Crisis (singular). Crises (plural).
● Analysis (Singular). Analyses (plural).
● Hypothesis (singular). Hypotheses (plural).
In the light of the above explanation, the sentence could be corrected in the following ways:
● The BASIS of each respective party HAS become more ideological.
In this sentence, the singular subject "basis" agrees with the singular verb "has", in compliance with the Rule of Concord.
● The BASES of each respective party HAVE become more ideological.
In this sentence, the plural subject "bases" agrees with the plural verb "have" to obey the Rule of Concord.
NOTE: In exceptional cases, "HAVE" is treated as singular. These are First Person Singular and Second Person Singular. Examples are:
● I HAVE bought a book on Dagbon Unity.
In this case, the First Person Singular Pronoun "I", as a subject, agrees with the verb "HAVE."
● You HAVE recognized the new efforts at finding peace, unity, and reconciliation in the Land of Gbewaa.
In this case, the Second Person Singular Pronoun "you", as a subject, agrees with the verb "HAVE."
Conclusion
Dear reader, it is important to state that the motive of LANGUAGE AGENDA is NOT to undermine the editorial competence of a leading newspaper in a developed country. Contrarily, the motive is to propagate the reality that even the most competent language user is NOT free from the tentacles of errors. Therefore, the best way we can respond to our errors is NOT to feel inadequate, but to learn from them.
Allah is the Best Linguist.
By Dr. Abubakar Mohammed Marzuq Azindoo,
Lecturer, University of Applied Management, McCarthy Hill, Accra



Israeli president picks Netanyahu's rival Eisenkot to try to form government
NPP has elected weak national executives—Adjei Baffour Acquah
Ofori-Atta describes late CLOGSAG leader Bampoe Addo as fearless negotiator
Ghana lost $6.5bn in mining revenue in 2025 – IFS
Obuasi SHTS case: 'If we don’t get any positive response, we’ll stage another de...
NMC to question midwife over controversial TikTok livestream
Akim Oda MP questions government’s handling of DHIMS2 shutdown over $64,000 debt
DHIMS restored, fully operational – Health Ministry
Mahama discusses financial health with UNSGSA Queen Máxima
Ghana to fully fund its own vaccines by 2030 as President Mahama announces Gavi ...
