U.S Midterms 2026 Lessons

God has spoken through the people, but that should not be misinterpreted that the Democrats are Godly. It is evidently a rebuke to the evils of Trump and enabled by the Republicans, one of whom is asking: 'is God dead'? On a more relatable note: my title says 'Lessons' and midterms', so what Lessons can we deliver? Does your country have midterms? I think every country should have midterms if you understand the advantages. As an independent, I am not jumping high like a Kenyan warrior, because I am not sure if the Democrats or most humans understand the difference between power and choice. God does, unfortunately, empower even d[oers of]evils sometimes. How well would the Democrats utilise the entrusted powers is an open speculation. I have repeatedly said that I prefer a God who rewards me over how hard He punishes my enemies. No! I fully understand the importance of punishment, but I do not think it carries over 25% in the four to five branches of Justice. Although numbers do matter, we can largely skip that part, considering the counting is still on.

Midterms: The purpose of midterm elections is to help redirect a government or country, because humans do mistakenly choose, from sexual partnership to political empowerment. Midterms are among the sub-balancing powers citizens deserve, but not every country gives citizens what they deserve. Try to sponsor a private bill (law) to help your country have midterms, it can save your country. Write the law so that 35 to 50% of parliament are chosen around mid-level of the presidency term. I do strongly criticise America sometimes, so where I am telling the world: 'learn from America' should not be taken lightly. How many European countries are rioting or trying to change their governments over 'inflation' that America is partly responsible for and suffering too? 'We are violent Americans', but we have midterms to potentially help re-direct whatever issues we have with power abusers, so let us not burn our precious country. Well, the title has to focus on 2026, but they are referring to how Nixon or the Republicans lost very badly for enabling Nixon more than Trump, or because Americans were angrier?

A president often comes with the power to influence voters to vote for others, legislators as an example. A president also needs enough legislators (members of Parliament) to work on many things. Oftentimes, the president is empowered with enough legislators in the general elections. Even where that is not the case, the proposals or work within the first two to xyz years can help citizens understand if they should give the president more or less powers through midterm elections. So midterms are indeed a gauge on the president and party in power. Midterms are also an opportunity for a good opposition or the available alternative to show why the public were wrong or naive. This by extension means questionable opposition parties may not try to burn down a country after losing a general election, because hope can prevent suicide at personal level or mass suicide at the political level. 'Let's give them six months chance' is something an average voter may employ. So how much damage will a president or party do within the first year, explicitly and implicitly? Well, you must be good at catching and exposing implicit wrongs -- two different talents. People often vote in fear -- but politicians may rule in fear, greed, and/or arrogance.

Analysis:
North Carolina (NC): Roy Cooper defeating the Republican by a huge margin is telling at many levels. NC was once my home state, I once lived there for about five years. So seeing them repenting or under-repenting still makes me smile. Why is bad or questionable North Carolina still jailing people for Cannabis? Because Bad Trump, Bad Biden, and even Bad Obama promised and failed oppressed America+, and they and their questionable journalists claim they wonder why midterms hardly go with the sitting party? Well, politicians promise and fail the good like a bad girl, or are men the problem? No! Things like legislative issues are unnecessarily delayed by politicians and sometimes to repeatedly run on a problem. Repentance should be with speed -- you lied and/or were sincerely mistaken about cannabis, why should you delay with: Obama : 'at least I said, cannabis is better than alcohol and allowed states to free the new slaves, so that the new 'Abraham Lincolns' can give excuses to delay freedom? Trump 1.0: 'Democrats only talk and give questionable empathy, at least I legalized hemp for money, not freedom for blacks+... Biden+: Let's promise for votes, and do nothing at federal level, Nancy Pelosi said health or covid 19 is more important than character or freedom of mainly black men; Kamala Harris said or demonstrated: government should dictate what men+ put in our body, not women; so they never pressured guilty Biden, but run on legalization repeatedly? Trump as a candidate in 2020, 1.5: Biden and Kamala jailed blacks for cannabis and I only refused to free blacks, but gave mainly whites hemp for money. The voters said we must try Biden. Trump in 2024: I don't fear North Carolina and beyond, I will legalize cannabis at the federal level. No! You foolishly gave me your votes, so let's use excuse on state rights, at least mindset, and fulfill the cruel promises beyond people ever imagined? Trump is a bad outlier -- he is a politician that tends to fulfill negative promises rather than good promises.

So when the North Carolina Senator, Tillerson or Tillis, stood up against Trump more than spineless blacks and average Republicans, he understood or guessed naive North Carolinians may side with guilty Trump. His resignation is thanks to Trump and perhaps why Roy Cooper even ran. Not only Trump's policies were on the ballot, but Trump's candidates were on the Ballot and woefully defeated. The lesson must include every party in the Gambia and every country must have a rule of thumb: any candidate that votes over 75% with the party should be tolerated. Without such agreement, you are naively creating a potential new Trump in your party. People deserve to vote their conscience, not always party lines; people deserve to publicly disagree with the president, especially if you are in a completely different branch. Although I used 75% agreement for legislators, I would tolerate an executive to disagree with me up to 75% privately, but no more than 10% publicly. So the rule of tolerance for the executive must be different, and I claim to be the most tolerant person on earth, but tolerance must have limits even with God and the Godly.

Michigan: Abdul El Sayed defeating Mike Rogers is a sweet victory. Trump loves the money of Muslims or more specifically: the questionable Arabs of the Middle East. However, Trump's disdain against Muslims caught me by surprise. When Trump talked about the Muslim ban in 2016, I still supported Trump because I thought that was just a questionable way of seeking votes. Banning Muslims was a gamble I was willing to take, because Trump was much better than Ms. Clinton and Democrats in general on 'freedom of speech', at least on promise level. I believe in freedom of speech more than the Americans who wrote it in their constitution. I believe in freedom of speech like or more than Muslims believe in prayers or going to Mecca. So I did not part with Trump even on the Muslim Ban, but on his brutal hunt against Julian Assange. We often agree that politicians are bad or questionable, but sometimes average Americans can be very questionable. Although I understand Assange's case hurt many Americans, I cannot remember hearing even an average American saying 'Assange was when I parted with Trump'. Apparently, countless Americans care only about Americans' freedom of speech, or how many Americans will even sacrifice Edward Snowden in the name of law. We should never punish the truthful. You can read my other writings for details, to avoid a book.

I do not have to repeat how they wrongly fought Abdul, but rather touch-on Lessons others may miss. Abdul can thank God for America, but what can Abdul do for God in and outside America? Can he, Mamdani, other so-called Muslim 'winners' accept where America respects the Quhr-aahn more than the Arabs and so-called Muslim countries? Again, ch.103 is indeed the checklist that is far above the so-called five pillars of Islam, which was drawn from a so-called 'authentic hadiths'. It is not that I opposed anything in the five pillars, but they have distracted the Muslims from a much more vital checklist: ch.103. Any significant reflection on 'exhort each other to truth and patience ' will reveal 'freedom of speech' is indeed included. So how did Arabs+ miss what was explicitly revealed in around 1500 years ago and America of 250 years old respect and may teach it to Arabs+, but they may reject it with endless so-called hadiths or cowardly deductions of the democrats+. Freedom of speech is a worthy gamble for the brave and humble, so cowardly democrats+ may point to where speech can be dangerous. Beside threats, let words fight with words, and never allow any government to take away our God given rights. Freedom of speech is a God given right, perhaps before humans were created. In Islam, it is a right and responsibility that countless Muslims neglect, but can the best of Muslims 'bring back true Islam (conscience) as a stranger to the Arabs+'? Jarga! That chapter 103 will mean women have the right to speak-up their version of truth and men can speak 'forbidden truth' to women in a matriarchal world? Jarga! You want to say our children or employees have the right to speak-up respectfully, disagree with even parents and presidents? Yes! I am willing to debate anyone on TV who wants to challenge the wisdom of that chapter. You can search 'time the thesis... by Jarga Kebba Gigo to learn more about that great chapter. The Questionable Arabs and Blacks+ may not like that chapter, but respecting that chapter will help you more than electing or nominating blacks and Arabs to high offices .

Although Michigan has many Arabs, the Arabs alone could not have delivered a victory. Whites who live with blacks tend to tolerate blacks more than those who learn about blacks through the questionable mainstream media. A similar reality is whites in Michigan may tolerate Arabs more than others. Of course, now the limited culture of cameras and social media is affecting even how mainstream media report on race. So countless Whites+ far beyond Michigan may have donated to Abdul for various reasons more than average Arabs may donate to non-Arabs, or try to free black Sudan like or more than how we try for Palestine. Can you initiate or at least learn, return good favor? Can every country leave Tribalism, Racism, etc beyond politics? You don't have to return negative 'favor' always, but I am not shy to generalise where it may help.

Among the things that they wrongly fought Abdul on is how other Arabs maltreat blacks in Michigan and beyond. I am not giving any Arab or anyone a pass on sins between creatures, but I think it is very wrong for blacks or anyone to support identity collective punishment or due denials. The blacks who steal, rob, or kill Arabs+ in Michigan contribute to why Arabs in Michigan may react in a way, but what is the excuse of Arab cruelty in the Arab world or even in Sudan as a start? The Arabs in the Gambia are largely OK to me than the divided good and bad Arabs I met in the west. I am not sure if I want to visit any Arab country, except as a Diplomat, a celebrity with a microphone, or a soldier with a gun/cameras. The honest reality remains that bad Arabs+ exist and how can Abdul help through teaching, culture of cameras, and which measures? Unless the good Arabs exhort the bad Arabs to truth, then what is chapter 103 saying? Similarly, bad blacks+ exist, so can Abdul and other elected Blacks truly help? Urging blacks to respect learning and working more can be raised and may significantly help. However, I think mandatory education up to age 18 or 20 is overdue in every country. The questionable whites+ may rather have it at the family level, but higher love is what can take it at national and worldwide level. There are 24 hours in a day, the government has the right to demand 5 to 8 hours with the children, and you can use similar hours to challenge what you disagree with. Conventional education matters. Ultimately, the child will make a choice, after growing. Without such, we are allowing negligence against children and charging negligence where else to protect adults? Jail the parents where need be, or force the stubborn teenager to a boarding school if need be. Once the laws are passed, a big chunk of the children may understand the learning age exists and we cannot compromise or be worse than Fidel Castro by being indifferent. What can Abdul and others do for Cuba, or even learn from Cuba?

Now I have to rush and minimise other states by state analysis.

Maine: Troy Jackson defeating Susan Collins. Can every country please have an age limit on public offices? I hate defending 'dictators' but sometimes they get certain things right. President Yahya Jammeh had an age limit on the presidency for good or questionable reasons. Adama Barrow was supposed to extend it to the lawmakers and all high positions, but he was blind in 'worshipping' his 'political dad' (Ousainou Darboe). Any opposition party in the Gambia and many countries can sponsor a law to have an age limit. Smart and strong aged folks can be advisors. You can point to other things why she lost, but age is indeed part of the reason, including poor performance. Until they make the laws, let the best of us refuse voting the elderly as a protest vote or gamble.

Texas: James Talarico beating Paxton, Trump, and Elon Musk is a sweet headline. I however think Gina Hinojosa defeating Greg Abbott is where God worked overtime or the greatest favor. Governor Abbott was terrible in gerrymandering or siding with Trump in very dangerous ways. Godly people learn, not always work God hard more than we may work our parents. Every country must have laws to stop or minimise gerrymandering loopholes -- your people may not learn to react well as Americans and Godly may rightly be indifferent to those who refuse to learn from others' mistakes.

Ohio: Double win for Democrats. Amy Acton and Sherrod Brown, both new, are another sweet lesson. I do not think vivek's ad was smart, but I oppose how the democrats dealt with that ad. Never beg an opponent to take down an ad, but rather see how to use questionable ads against your opponents. America is sadly censoring even ads? If no threats are in the ad, freedom of speech must be respected smartly. Otherwise, Haley Stevens or who may censor an ad by supporters of Abdul and beyond. Endless debates on ads or the worst of ads will not help voters.

South Carolina: Annie Andrews winning Ms. Graham is another God's miracle. Killing Lindsey Graham may have been a necessary step, or Trump abuse to own cannot mean forever own. South Carolina is worse than North Carolina in Racism and beyond, even though they are neighbours. Was Trump hand picked person and policies rejected by even under repenting South Carolinians? Well, I hope God ends Tribalism, Racism, etc worldwide. Please do so God, even if you have to work overtime. By the way, I am writing this article while most people sleep, and I do not get financial payments for my writings. I am also working overtime, 'slave' to America or uplifting humankind?

Iowa: Josh Turek pick-up the seat? Wow! Should Trump sue those who did the poll or voted ? Or I and who should sue those whose polls said : Republicans would win IOWA?

Virgin Islands: Stacey plaskett female Governor won? Some people call it black or female win , but except they are a territory with less rights. These territories must find ways towards full rights, or they are indeed sub-class citizens.

Florida: Byron Donald's beats David jolly as governor by 50% ? They called it another black win. First, 50% or even less than that can make you a winner in Florida, but freeing people demands 60% on cannabis legalization in Florida? Agreeing to bad agreements is wrong, but the reality is the majority should not decide that 'personal rights' can be disrespected. The winner was convicted of cannabis according to Wikipedia. Many blacks, especially Republicans, are like ungrateful House negros. I believe the federal government should legalize cannabis and pursue worldwide legalization of cannabis. Otherwise, all governors should legalize it and regulate it well. This same terrible Florida is against recording even abusive cops. Fight that law, but urge all to buy body cameras and appeal to good judges.

New Hampshire: Chris Pappas winning Sununu to be first openly Gay Senator is the celebration of Democrats? We are yet to have openly cannabis users in Cabinet or many top positions, because of the federal law. So America tolerates LGBTQ+ more than cannabis folks can only mean my type may fight LGBTQ or be reluctant to their rights. By the way, I actually made a song denouncing the killing or jailing of homosexuals before the u.s legalized LGBTQ+ . So I may not be against or for LGBTQ+ as many may think, but it makes sense to politicise certain things. I don't want a God/devil, president, Senator, governor, etc who thinks Drunkards or LGBTQ+ are better than cannabis folks. Why should we be the last to be freed from government oppression? Because countless cannabis users or even activists under fight than LGBTQ. They organise and care about the rights of every LGBTQ in every country, while cannabis users in California think hiding in North Carolina is ok? Stop being cowards, and understand the right to travel without fear and beyond.

Evil Richard Nixon fought against cannabis worldwide, but we cannot find enough good Americans who understand the need to fight for federal and worldwide legalization? Saudi-Arabia is saying American Drunkards can visit Saudi-Arabia, but even sick Americans cannot have medical Cannabis inside Saudi-Arabia? Abdul and others must not fight for only Americans, but understand Cannabis is a high blessing or at least tolerable in the spirit of ch.103. Jarga! You are calling us to ch.103, the most disrespected or ignored chapter in the Muslim+ world?

Money matters and Money matters most are two different things. Money matters is something I can certainly relate to. Money matters most or the only thing that matters is a dangerous mindset we see far beyond Trump. Which mindset Trump had when his leaked audio claimed some or many women would let him and Epstein+ if they are rich? Which mindset slave masters had? Which mindset said at least Trump will fix the economy or his personal economy and few people? Which mindset causes Africans to gamble their lives to enter Europe?

Overall, I am hearing from democrats+ that most or all Americans are prostitute minded -- let's focus on the economy, economy, economy. I don't know why God gave Trump and Epstein money over me, or why Americans listen to Elon Musk over me? I suspect money can buy some American votes, or the democrats and who think wealth is above health and character? Count your promises (words) and count your bills (laws) on wealth versus health versus character. I can understand seeking votes means speaking the language people understand most, but numbers and categories matter in my world. Should you assign enough people or days to work on each category? Was it not wealth above character why slavery was legalized and repentance was never swift? Was it not wealth over character why you waged and supported countless wars? I heard Americans complaining about the Iran war and the consequences they felt, but I am yet to hear enough Americans saying: 'the robbery we are doing to Venezuela is very bad'. I am yet to hear enough Americans saying how our wars are impacting the poor around the world is very bad. Money and sex are often welcomed, but they said cannabis will destroy money and make inter-racial sex easier?

No! I want to know what is your estimate to enrich every hard working person, not just Americans. If we have to ditch capitalism and embrace Lovism, I can promise you every working person can own a home within 2 to 5 years under good regulations. However, I think wealth is great, health is greater, and character is greatest.

So what can Democrats do on preventive health versus curative health on which timelines? Capitalism may forbid you facilitating many preventive health measures, but you should bravely resist like or close to Finland. I heard Finland offers free outdoor gyms, except it is too cold for how many months? Still, the summers can get them addicted to try indoor gyms come winter and reduce the bills of curative health. I fully understand how God can heal through countless plants, not just cannabis. So can democrats legislate at federal or state level to have a minimum of 25% vegan restaurants in all public food courts? Climate change, diversity, choice for children, etc can be argued. It may be bad business for curative health if people are healthy, but I don't mind killing or gambling certain industries. Even with free health care, I don't like hospitals and see them as one of the earthly hells. Even capitalists believe in free food for prisoners, so be careful of 'free things' from the capitalists. They oppose free schooling or mandatory schooling, but support mandatory drafts? Seriously though, governments must at least facilitate towards preventive health, not just curative health. It does not have to be free, but ascertain availability even to poor villages and fairly compete with private businesses where need be. The needed regulations on curative health may be above what democrats dare deliver.

Data Centres and AI in General: Whereas limiting Data centres may be good, I do not think democrats are talking about the most important things around AI in general. AI demands regulations that average capitalists are not capable of. Search 'why I prefer AI over politicians... plus my name. Every measure they take on AI, ask in detail and what more is needed, or jolly in 'at least ' mindset. Run an ad: Access to the knowledge and/or products of AI must be universal, beyond the u.s . If you think you can be indifferent to the world's trying poor, then the karma of indifference is indeed due. Then the rich human beings being indifferent to you or AI being indifferent to you or up to all of humankind is to be gauged?

On character: We must think and understand this may arguably be the easiest to repent on and impress God. There are about four to five branches as per our definition of Justice: Justice is as deserved in power and choice for reward and/or punishment, and justice is pregnant with a baby called tolerance.

Power or Empowering: I believe mandatory education is good and may not cost you votes, if you sell it well. Children are much more vulnerable than women, but democrats and many parties want to fight for even questionable women and claim it will trickle down to the children. No! Children deserve empowerment and black people are arguably the worst at taking care of children, in and outside America. Choose brave black+ folks and start an independent institution for the welfare of children. The primary purpose is to educate, but enforcement is crucial where people refuse to learn about sins between creatures, especially against children. Just like guilty parents go to jail for 'child support ', questionable parents must suffer if they neglect the education+ of children. The central government would likely be poor on such, so having an independent institution is the best route. Even things like USAID should be tied to countries willing to have independent institutions for children welfare, including mandatory education. Stop forwarding excuses or may God curse you. I am willing to privately or publicly help you on how to make it worldwide.

A strong Culture of cameras actually falls under empowerment. Again, you may have cowardly people arguing on things like privacy. Search : Pervert or Anti-Pervert Glasses, among the many articles I wrote on cameras. You can be ungrateful, but limited cameras certainly contribute to why you won. Gratitude should mean urging for more cameras by civilians and even legislating incentives like tax breaks on cameras.

Choice: This is the area I tend to agree with democrats more than Republicans, except on abortion. Choice in privacy and publicly are different; similarly, personal and sins between creatures are different. Despite his evil leaning, I think Donald Trump did good on abortion. The child is a creature with feelings in and outside the mother. So if you do not have mental eyes, then you may argue only on physical eyes. Since children do not have votes, they are also easy to neglect. Show me one hundred women who died through questionable state laws or cowardly doctors, and I will show you two hundred questionable women who abused choice up to sins between creatures... Since we largely agree on choice, I should not waste time and space to risk more disagreement. They believe abortionists women should dictate if men+ can put cannabis in our bodies then and now? They may fight for abortion outside America, but are reluctant to fight for cannabis outside the state, continent, hemisphere, or world?

Reward: This is a very complex issue and where wealth becomes primary. Can humans reward much on character or even health? Very little, if any. So financial rewards truly matter and capitalism offers the worst reward system known to man in recent times. If you look at the places with the most homeless or poor folks, they are all capitalists or under the cruel sanctions of capitalists. They may forward excuses like 'freedom [to rob]' or point to one percent of their victims, ignoring the realities of ninety nine percent of their victims or guilty-victims.

Punishment: We have to divide here into due and undue punishment. Perhaps America and the world should raise how we punish sins between creatures, including assault. Where should we reduce or eliminate punishment? Personal sins. Humans are not knowledgeable enough and run a very dangerous gamble if we try to punish personal sins or 'stupidity'. We can and should advise on personal matters, but unless you can show a victim, it is dangerous to have the government dictating right and wrong with punishment. Both parties are terribly obsessed with punishment. I honestly consider punishment as the least important branch for humankind to focus on. Even my call for a strong worldwide culture of cameras, it is not primarily to punish. Yes, I do believe it is part of Justice and vital, but mainly on sins between creatures. A believer of God must leave some aspects of punishment to God, including imprecations. Trying to punish Trump and others may depend on the crimes and evidence. Trump going to prison or removed from the presidency may not necessarily translate to me or you owning a beachfront mansion, owning a swimming pool, etc.

You can release countless cannabis folks within weeks, so why spend months or years to jail one or few people? Trump does not dare veto a cannabis legalization bill. The worst of the democrats may rather delay it and try to run on it for votes, but remember God and even the Godly are watching. You may have to share the credits with a non-running Trump, but you can at least say we presented it late and after a sure majority. Doing it early is actually more helpful, because states can regulate and some cowards can realize legalization does not mean the end of the world. You have denied and are denying countless people working opportunities by delaying legalization. Countless people are going through arrests, fines, and even prison just for your political gain? I think such can be worse than Abraham Lincoln and others denying certain rights to blacks for political safety?

Tolerance is arguably the fifth branch or baby: You must feed the mother to feed the baby. So I believe the primary purpose of tolerance is learning. This is why I said: tolerance deserves 0 to 25% feeding. Again, tolerating personal matters has very blurry lines. Saying I do not believe we should jail or kill LGBTQ+ folks is arguing on personal matters/rights. Saying people have the right to criticise LGBTQ+, alcohol, cannabis, cameras, cigarettes, women, etc falls under freedom of speech, even if some may cross the lines... Saying I oppose LGBTQ having 'artificial' children falls under freedom of speech and potential sins between creatures. After all, tolerance is not something we should think about when making personal choices. Instead, we should try to be perfect at learning, working, or having fun. As a baby, it may become a witness for or against you. What should we tolerate at the government level with consistency? Personal rights are sacred and tolerance may be the bridge where sweet and hard patience exist. I fought for cannabis legalization when I was not using cannabis and deemed it 'not good, not bad'. So! May the Kind Lord forgive and guide us above the celebrated leaders, be it Trump, Barrow, Mahama, Tinubu, Abdul, Mamdani, MBS, etc. If Democrats refuse to do right, may they lose , and/or God judges America and the world asap, justly. May God bless me, the trying good, and Showlove Trinity: let's learn, let's work, let's have fun.

By Jarga Kebba Gigo
An Activist and Transformer
Author of Juts Quhr-aahn