Ghana’s effort to put digital learning tools in senior high school students’ hands didn't begin with today’s debate over social media, charging units, or student discipline.
The government publicly announced the idea in January 2023, outlining plans to provide senior high school students with tablets loaded with textbooks, past examination questions, and other learning materials. The initiative moved from promise to implementation on March 25, 2024, when the Ghana Smart Schools Project formally launched, targeting approximately 1.3 million SHS students for individual tablets. The devices were intended to support research, teaching, and learning while helping prepare students for an increasingly technology-driven world. Ghana News Agency
That ambition was - and remains - worth pursuing.
A student with access to a well-designed digital device can carry an entire library in one hand. Textbooks can be updated more easily. Learners can access simulations, videos, practice questions, interactive resources, and research materials that would be difficult for every school to provide physically.
But nearly three years after the initiative launched, Ghana is facing the harder stage of educational technology reform.
Distributing devices is one thing. Ensuring that those devices consistently improve learning is another.
That distinction has become especially important after the Conference of Heads of Assisted Secondary Schools raised concerns.
At its 64th Annual National Conference in October 2026, CHASS called for restrictions on social-media access on government-issued student tablets. Its communiqué also raised concerns about tablets being supplied without charging units, warning that unregulated charging could create safety risks in schools. CHASS further proposed that textbooks should remain available rather than schools relying exclusively on tablets. graphic.com.gh
These concerns should not become an argument for abandoning digital learning.
They should become an opportunity to improve it.
The real question is no longer whether Ghanaian students should have access to educational technology.
They should.
The question is whether Ghana has built the infrastructure, classroom culture, teacher capacity, safeguards, and digital responsibility necessary to ensure that a tablet remains primarily a learning tool rather than a source of distraction.
Giving students tablets was only the beginning
One of the easiest mistakes governments and education systems can make is to measure technology reform by the number of devices distributed.
Distribution is visible.
It is easy to count.
It produces photographs, ceremonies, and impressive statistics.
Learning is harder to measure.
The Ghana Smart Schools Project was conceived as more than a device-distribution programme. At launch, the tablets came loaded with digital educational content to support teaching, research, and learning. The broader project also envisioned digitally equipped Smart Schools and technology-rich learning environments. Ghana News Agency
That broader vision matters.
Because a tablet by itself does not improve education.
Its educational value depends on what students do with it, what teachers ask students to do with it, what resources it contains, and how schools manage its use.
A mathematics student might use a tablet to explore graphs, analyse data, practise algebra, investigate geometric relationships, or model a real-world situation.
A science student might access virtual experiments or interactive simulations.
A student preparing for an examination might review digital textbooks and past questions.
But the same device can also provide entertainment, social-media access, messaging, games, and other activities competing directly for a student’s attention.
Technology does not automatically choose education over distraction.
The system around the technology must make that choice easier.
Digital citizenship must be taught, not assumed
CHASS’s call to deactivate social-media functions raises an important policy question.
Technical restrictions may be necessary in some circumstances. Schools have always placed reasonable limits on materials or behaviours that interfere with learning.
But technical blocking alone will not develop responsible digital citizens.
Young people will encounter social media, artificial intelligence, online information, misinformation, privacy risks, and digital distractions outside school whether educational authorities want them to or not.
Students therefore need more than restricted access.
They need to learn:
- when technology supports learning and when it interrupts it;
- how to evaluate online information.
- how to protect personal information.
- how to communicate responsibly.
- how to use artificial intelligence ethically.
- why academic dishonesty has consequences.
- and how to manage their own attention in an environment designed to compete for it.
Recent efforts by the National Commission for Civic Education illustrate this need. In October, the NCCE’s Tano North Municipal Directorate specifically engaged parents and students about the responsible use and maintenance of government-issued tablets, encouraging learners to use the devices principally for academic research and approved educational resources. NCCEGH
That kind of education should not be occasional.
Digital citizenship should become part of the learning programme surrounding the devices themselves.
If a student is given a powerful digital tool without being taught to manage it responsibly, we should not be surprised when they misuse it.
Teachers need more than devices in students’ hands
The teacher remains the most important person in educational technology.
A tablet can provide information.
It cannot independently determine the learning objective of a lesson.
It cannot decide when a graphing application will deepen understanding and when pencil-and-paper reasoning would be more appropriate.
It cannot tell whether students are genuinely investigating a mathematical relationship or simply clicking through an application.
Those decisions remain pedagogical.
Teachers therefore need sustained professional development in technology-integrated instruction, not merely instructions on how to switch devices on.
They need opportunities to learn how to:
design lessons around digital resources.
manage classrooms in which every student has a connected device.
monitor student activity.
integrate digital and non-digital learning.
use interactive resources without sacrificing mathematical reasoning.
recognise inappropriate use.
and incorporate emerging tools such as AI without allowing technology to do students’ thinking for them.
As a Ghanaian mathematics and STEM educator currently teaching in the United States, I have repeatedly observed one important lesson:
Simply placing technology in schools does not guarantee better learning.
The real difference comes from teachers who know how, when, and why to use it.
Continuous professional development must therefore remain central to Ghana’s digital-learning agenda.
Infrastructure matters as much as the tablet
CHASS’s concern about charging units may sound less exciting than artificial intelligence or digital content.
It is not.
It illustrates an essential truth about educational technology:
Every device depends on an ecosystem.
A tablet needs electricity.
It needs safe charging infrastructure.
It may need connectivity.
It needs maintenance.
Damaged devices need repair or replacement.
Software requires updating.
Users require technical support.
Schools need secure storage and procedures for lost or damaged devices.
The October CHASS communiqué specifically warned that supplying tablets without appropriate charging units could encourage unregulated charging arrangements and potentially create safety problems in schools. graphic.com.gh
Whether every claimed school-fire link ultimately proves attributable to charging practices requires proper investigation. But the underlying infrastructure concern is legitimate.
A national digital-learning programme cannot simply ask:
Have the tablets arrived?
It must also ask:
Can schools use them safely and reliably every day?
A tablet with a dead battery is not a digital-learning resource.
It is an expensive object sitting on a desk.
Tablets and textbooks should not become opponents
CHASS has also called for the reintroduction or continued availability of textbooks rather than exclusive dependence on tablets. graphic.com.gh
This deserves a balanced response.
The debate should not become:
tablet or textbook?
Good education does not require such a false choice.
Digital resources have obvious advantages. They can store enormous amounts of content, offer multimedia explanations, provide interactive tasks, and make resources easier to update.
Printed textbooks also have advantages.
They require no electricity.
They create fewer opportunities for digital distraction.
Students can annotate them easily.
Some learners may comprehend certain kinds of extended reading better in print.
Teachers should therefore have flexibility to choose the resource that best suits the learning objective.
A mathematics lesson involving dynamic graphs may strongly benefit from technology.
A close reading of a complex passage may sometimes benefit from print.
A science investigation may use both.
The question should not be which medium wins. It should be which combination produces the strongest learning.
Academic integrity must be part of digital responsibility
Ghana also has reason to think seriously about the relationship between student technology and academic integrity.
In September, WAEC cancelled the entire 2026 WASSCE results of 861 candidates for possessing mobile phones in examination halls. It also cancelled subject results for 7,434 candidates for bringing unauthorised materials into examination centres. Ghana News Agency
Those cases involved mobile phones and other prohibited materials - not necessarily government-issued student tablets - and the distinction matters.
But the broader lesson is relevant.
As students gain greater access to connected digital devices, schools must become more deliberate about teaching the boundaries between legitimate technological assistance and academic misconduct.
The arrival of generative artificial intelligence makes that challenge even more urgent.
Students need to understand that having access to an answer is not the same as understanding it.
A student who asks AI to solve an equation and copies the response has produced an answer.
A student who compares strategies, detects an AI error, explains the reasoning, and determines whether the answer is valid has engaged in learning.
Digital education therefore requires a shift from simply policing devices to developing digital judgment.
Do not solve distraction only through prohibition
Schools clearly need rules.
Teachers need authority to protect instructional time.
There may be applications and websites that have little legitimate educational role during school hours.
Device-management technology can help.
But Ghana should be careful not to define digital-learning policy entirely through restriction.
If students experience the tablet mainly as a locked device containing electronic versions of the same materials they previously received on paper, much of its transformational potential will be lost.
The more ambitious goal is to design classrooms where the device's educational use is more compelling than its distractions.
Students could use tablets to:
analyse rainfall or temperature data.
model population change.
investigate environmental problems.
create presentations.
learn coding.
design STEM projects.
conduct guided research.
collaborate on problem-solving tasks.
access formative assessments.
and examine multiple representations of mathematical and scientific ideas.
In such classrooms, the tablet becomes more than an electronic textbook.
It becomes a tool for inquiry, creation, and problem-solving.
That was closer to the transformative promise behind the Ghana Smart Schools Project in the first place.
Measure learning, not distribution
The next phase of the initiative should therefore be evaluated differently from the first.
The important questions should include:
Are students using the devices regularly for academic work?
Do teachers believe tablets improve lessons?
Which subjects benefit most?
Are students demonstrating stronger digital literacy?
Are rural and less-resourced schools experiencing the same benefits as better-resourced ones?
How many devices remain functional?
Are schools receiving adequate charging and technical support?
What kinds of misuse are most common?
Do device-management restrictions improve learning?
And, most importantly:
Are students learning more effectively because they have these tablets?
Those questions require data.
Ghana should periodically evaluate the programme and publish findings—not simply about distribution numbers, but about educational impact.
The tablet programme should evolve, not retreat
Policymakers should take the concerns raised by CHASS seriously.
School heads work closest to the operational realities of these devices.
If they are warning about charging infrastructure, distraction, social-media use, and excessive reliance on tablets, policymakers should listen.
But the answer should not be to conclude that digital learning itself was a mistake.
The tablet initiative began from a reasonable educational aspiration: to expand students’ access to learning materials and prepare young people for a technology-rich future. Ghana News Agency
That goal remains valid.
What Ghana needs now is the second generation of the policy:
better device management.
strong digital citizenship education.
continuous teacher professional development.
safe charging infrastructure.
reliable technical support.
thoughtful integration of print and digital resources.
clear academic-integrity expectations.
and serious evaluation of learning outcomes.
Putting a device in a student’s hand was the beginning.
Building the educational culture that ensures the device serves learning is the harder part.
And that is where Ghana’s attention must now turn.
The success of the One Student, One Tablet initiative should not ultimately be measured by how many tablets were distributed.
Measure it by what Ghanaian students can learn, investigate, create, and solve with them.
Because a tablet is neither automatically educational nor automatically distracting.
What makes it one or the other is how we design the learning around it.
Shadrack Agyapong
Mathematics & STEM Educator | Education Researcher
U.S.-Based Ghanaian Educator
Sources
- The One Student, One Tablet initiative was publicly proposed in 2023 and formally launched on March 25, 2024, as part of the Ghana Smart Schools Project. The initiative targeted approximately 1.3 million SHS students with tablets equipped with digital learning content to support research, teaching, and learning. Ghana News Agency
- At the conclusion of its 64th Annual National Conference in October 2026, CHASS raised concerns about social-media access, the absence of charging units for some student tablets, potential safety risks associated with unregulated charging, and excessive reliance on digital devices rather than textbooks. graphic.com.gh
- The NCCE has recently launched a public education campaign encouraging students and parents to treat government-issued tablets as educational resources and use them primarily for academic purposes. NCCEGH
- The broader academic-integrity discussion is supported by WAEC’s September 2026 announcement that the entire results of 861 WASSCE candidates were cancelled for possessing mobile phones in examination halls; this article does not suggest that those cases involved government-issued tablets. Ghana News Agency
GES directs Ashanti regional, Obuasi East educational directors to step aside ov...
Ghana's economy doing well; Bawumia's 'pocket economy’ theory will not fly – Apa...
Obuasi SHTS headmaster resigns as Juaben NDC secretary, withdraws chairmanship b...
NDC reverses decision, directs Obuasi SHTS headmaster to step aside from Juaben ...
Africa must turn mineral wealth into jobs and shared prosperity – Mahama
'Despicable!’ – Prof. Prempeh blasts GES, NDC over handling of Obuasi SHTS alleg...
Police search for missing fishing canoe and seven crew members off Axim
October 20: Cedi sells at GHS12.25 on forex market, GHS11.67 on BoG interbank
'Very distasteful’ – Selorm Branttie blasts NDC for clearing Obuasi SHTS headmas...
Power fluctuation destroys MTN mast power plant worth GH¢200,000 in Begoro
