The Law And Vigilantism: Assessing The Impact Of Political Vigilantism On National Security In Ghana

Abstract
Political vigilantism presents a distinctive challenge to national security and democratic governance in Ghana because it occupies an uneasy space between political participation, informal security provision and unlawful private enforcement of public authority. This article examines the phenomenon principally through the Ghanaian experience of political party-affiliated vigilante groups, particularly their emergence around electoral politics and their persistence into periods of governance. It argues that vigilantism cannot be understood adequately either as a simple product of criminality or as an uncomplicated substitute for ineffective state security. Its persistence is connected to perceived institutional weakness, distrust of formal justice and security institutions, youth unemployment, economic insecurity, political patronage and expectations of access to state resources following electoral victories. The article further examines the double-edged implications of vigilantism for national security. In some communities, informal security actors may respond rapidly to crime where formal institutions are perceived to be ineffective. Yet the same phenomenon can undermine the State's monopoly over legitimate coercion, weaken confidence in law enforcement, intimidate political opponents and electoral actors, interfere with public institutions, and erode the credibility of democratic processes. The enactment of the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act, 2019 (Act 999) represents a significant legal response, but law alone cannot resolve the institutional and socio-economic conditions that sustain political vigilantism. The article therefore develops an integrated response centred on effective enforcement of the law, institutional reform, stronger police-community relations, improved criminal justice delivery, public education, community policing and attention to the socio-economic conditions that make political vigilantism attractive. The central proposition is that sustainable national security requires the restoration of confidence in lawful state institutions rather than the substitution of partisan or private force for public authority.

Keywords

Political vigilantism; national security; Ghana; Act 999; electoral violence; rule of law; democratic governance; community security; securitization.

1. Introduction: When Political Mobilisation Becomes Private Force

Ghana's democratic experience has generally been characterized by competitive elections and repeated transfers of political power. Yet alongside formal democratic institutions has developed a less formal political infrastructure: networks of young party activists and vigilante groups that have, at different times, been associated with political parties and electoral competition. Their activities range from political mobilisation and protection at political events to intimidation, attacks, disruption of public institutions and interference with electoral processes.

The legal and security significance of this phenomenon lies in the fact that vigilantism involves the assumption, by private actors, of functions ordinarily reserved for institutions established by law. The problem is therefore not merely that violence may occur. The deeper concern is institutional: who has authority to investigate crime, arrest suspects, maintain public order, protect public institutions and determine guilt? Where political groups or their supporters begin to perform these functions through force, the distinction between public authority and private power becomes blurred.

The Ghanaian experience also demonstrates why a purely punitive understanding of vigilantism is incomplete. The research underlying this article shows that communities may turn to vigilante structures when formal security and justice institutions are perceived as ineffective, inaccessible, corrupt or unresponsive. In that sense, vigilantism may reveal weaknesses in the security architecture even where its methods are unlawful. The appropriate response must therefore address both the conduct that the law prohibits and the institutional conditions that make such conduct socially or politically attractive.

Political vigilantism has been described in the literature as predominantly violent and extralegal collective activity, as an indication of institutional failure, and as an informal political sector. Johnston's classic question, 'What is vigilantism?', is useful because it directs attention to the boundary between citizen action and unlawful assumption of State functions. Abrahams, Pratten and Smith similarly place vigilantism within broader debates about protection, state authority and informal ordering. In Ghana, the phenomenon acquires a distinct political character because groups associated with political parties may become instruments of mobilisation, protection and, in some circumstances, coercion.

This article therefore approaches the subject from three interconnected perspectives. First, it considers the legal and institutional dimension: the consequences of private enforcement for the rule of law and the authority of State institutions. Second, it considers national security in both traditional and human-security terms. Third, it examines the democratic consequences of political vigilantism, particularly its effects on elections, political competition and confidence in public institutions. The objective is not to reduce the phenomenon to a single cause or consequence, but to show why it persists and why an effective response must be multidimensional.

2. Understanding Vigilantism and Its Political Form

Vigilantism is commonly associated with collective action in which individuals take upon themselves functions of protection, policing or punishment outside the formal legal system. Asamoah, Bob-Milliar, Gyampo, Graham and Asare, Johnston, Pratten, Smith and Rosenbaum and Sederberg, among others, situate vigilantism within debates about institutional weakness, political participation and informal coercion. The concept is not necessarily limited to electoral violence. It can include community-based security, punishment of suspected offenders, political protection and other forms of informal enforcement.

The political variant is narrower. Political vigilantism in Ghana concerns individuals or groups affiliated with, aligned to, or mobilised in support of political parties, who use or threaten to use force in pursuit of political objectives. The underlying research describes this as particularly visible during electoral periods but notes that it can continue after elections into the governing phase. That temporal persistence matters. If vigilante activity were merely an election-time phenomenon, it might be treated principally as an electoral-management problem. Its continuation after elections, however, turns it into a broader question of public administration, State authority and national security.

The literature also cautions against treating every political activist as a vigilante. Political parties necessarily depend upon volunteers, campaigners, polling agents and youth organisations. Gyampo and his co-authors note that party activists can perform legitimate functions such as assisting with voter registration and serving as polling agents. The legal and security difficulty arises where political mobilisation crosses into intimidation, violence, disruption of public institutions or private enforcement of law.

That distinction is important for legal analysis. Democratic participation is protected and legitimate; the private exercise of coercive public authority is a different matter. The central legal question is consequently not whether young people participate actively in party politics, but whether political affiliation becomes a basis for conduct that displaces lawful institutions or uses force to achieve political ends.

3. The Ghanaian Trajectory: From Political Foot Soldiers to a National-Security Question

The historical roots of political vigilantism in Ghana extend beyond the Fourth Republic. The underlying study traces forms of political vigilantism to the post-independence period, including resistance associated with political and ethnically oriented groups. In the Fourth Republic, however, political vigilantism became more visibly connected with electoral competition and the organisation of party 'foot soldiers'. The growth of door-to-door campaigning during the 1980s and 1990s increased the political importance of young grassroots activists.

The research records that political vigilante groups have been associated with political parties across successive elections and that their activities have not been confined to violence. They have assisted campaigns, participated in voter-registration activities, acted as polling agents and provided protection at political events. This explains why the phenomenon has sometimes received local or political support despite its risks.

The tension became particularly visible after electoral transitions. The research identifies the post-2016 seizure or occupation of public facilities and the 2017 Delta Force incidents as illustrations of the danger that political mobilisation can mutate into a claim of entitlement over State institutions. The assault on the Ashanti Regional Security Coordinator and the subsequent disruption of a Kumasi Circuit Court were especially significant because they demonstrated a direct challenge to public authority and the administration of justice.

The Ayawaso West Wuogon by-election of 31 January 2019 further exposed the relationship between political contestation, security personnel and electoral violence. The research records that approximately twelve people were injured in the incident and links the episode to the subsequent legislative response. Parliament enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act, 2019 (Act 999), expressly addressing vigilantism and related conduct.

The legal development is significant because it represents a movement from political condemnation to statutory prohibition. The enactment of Act 999 reflects the recognition that political vigilantism is not simply a matter for political parties to manage internally. It implicates public order, criminal responsibility, the integrity of elections, the authority of public institutions and national security.

4. The Legal Architecture: Act 999 and the Rule of Law

The principal statutory authority identified in the underlying research is the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act, 2019 (Act 999). Its enactment is central to the legal response to political vigilantism in Ghana. The statute represents a legislative determination that vigilantism and related conduct cannot be normalised as an alternative form of political organisation or security provision.

The significance of Act 999 extends beyond the criminalisation of particular acts. Its broader constitutional and rule-of-law importance lies in reaffirming the principle that coercive public authority must operate through lawful institutions. A democratic State cannot simultaneously insist that courts, police services and other public authorities have exclusive legal responsibilities while permitting partisan groups to exercise those responsibilities through force.

From that perspective, the most serious legal problem with vigilantism is not simply that vigilantes may commit offences. Individuals can commit offences in any society. The distinctive danger is collective political power combined with coercive capacity. When a group believes that political affiliation protects it from arrest, prosecution or institutional consequences, ordinary criminal law becomes less credible. When the group additionally attempts to remove public officials, interfere with courts or control public facilities, the problem becomes institutional rather than merely individual.

Act 999 must therefore be understood as part of a broader requirement of institutional enforcement. A statute prohibiting vigilantism has limited deterrent value if enforcement is selective, delayed or perceived to depend upon political affiliation. The legitimacy of the legal response depends upon consistent application of the law to unlawful conduct irrespective of the political identity of the persons involved.

The underlying research does not provide a detailed section-by-section analysis of Act 999 and does not identify specific statutory provisions beyond the Act itself. Accordingly, this article deliberately does not invent section numbers or statutory language not contained in the source material. The legal proposition supported by the research is that Act 999 established a statutory prohibition against vigilantism and related offences and should be treated as the principal legislative response identified in the paper.

5. National Security Beyond the Traditional Military Paradigm

An assessment of vigilantism's impact requires a sufficiently broad conception of national security. Lasswell and Lippmann represent the more traditional conception, under which national security concerns protection of the State, its fundamental values, sovereignty and territorial integrity against external threats. Buzan, and Krause and Williams, demonstrate the subsequent broadening of security studies beyond a purely military focus.

Under the broader conception, security includes political, economic, social, health, food, energy, environmental and other dimensions of human security. This is particularly relevant to political vigilantism because its consequences may never resemble a conventional military threat. A group intimidating voters, attacking a court, disrupting a public institution or undermining confidence in the police can nevertheless produce a serious security deficit.

The human-security approach therefore changes the question. Instead of asking only whether Ghana's territory or governmental institutions are physically secure from external attack, one asks whether citizens can participate in political life without intimidation, whether public institutions can perform their functions, whether disputes are resolved through lawful processes and whether communities trust the institutions responsible for their safety.

Political vigilantism affects these dimensions simultaneously. It may generate immediate physical insecurity; it may weaken political security by intimidating opponents; it may affect institutional security by challenging public authorities; and it may produce longer-term insecurity where armed or organised groups become entrenched. The threat is therefore cumulative rather than confined to isolated violent incidents.

6. Securitization and the Politics of Security

The research applies securitization theory, associated particularly with Ole Wæver and the Copenhagen School, to understand how political actors frame certain conditions as security threats requiring exceptional responses. Wilkinson's discussion of the Copenhagen School is relevant to the difficulty of applying securitization theory outside its original European context.

In the Ghanaian electoral setting, political violence can generate an atmosphere in which insecurity is presented as requiring extraordinary security measures. The underlying research argues that this can create a pathway for political vigilante groups to be treated as security actors or 'securitizing agents'. Once partisan groups are recruited, tolerated or informally used as security instruments, however, the process can weaken autonomous institutions that should protect electoral integrity.

The danger is therefore circular. Perceived insecurity can be used to justify reliance on informal security providers; reliance on informal providers can weaken formal institutions; weakened institutions can deepen public insecurity; and deeper insecurity can produce further demand for informal protection. Breaking this cycle requires restoring the credibility and capacity of lawful security institutions rather than allowing partisan security structures to become permanent.

7. Why Political Vigilantism Persists

The literature reviewed in the research identifies institutional weakness as a recurring explanation. Pratten, Seekings, Nina and related scholarship associate vigilantism with ineffective or distrusted criminal-justice systems, inadequate law enforcement, perceived corruption, weak prosecution, frustration with crime and the inability of the State to satisfy basic security expectations.

In Ghana, these institutional explanations interact with socio-economic conditions. The research identifies youth unemployment as a particularly important factor because political parties can mobilise large numbers of young people who lack stable employment and who may expect material rewards from political success. The paper cites a World Bank/Bank of Ghana assessment reporting high unemployment among young people and connects economic insecurity with recruitment into political groups.

The political economy of patronage adds another layer. Where young political activists believe that electoral victory should generate employment or access to public resources, the transition from campaign mobilisation to claims over State institutions becomes easier. This helps explain why vigilantism may persist after an election. The group does not necessarily perceive its role as ending when votes are counted; it may view itself as having contributed to victory and therefore as entitled to rewards.

Political vigilantism is consequently sustained by both supply and demand. The supply side includes unemployed or economically insecure young people, political entrepreneurs and organisational networks capable of mobilisation. The demand side includes communities seeking rapid protection where formal institutions are perceived as ineffective. The result is a social environment in which unlawful security provision can acquire a degree of legitimacy even while it remains legally prohibited.

8. The Double-Edged Impact on National Security

The most important conclusion emerging from the research is that vigilantism has a dual character. Kantor and Persson and the International Crisis Group recognise circumstances in which vigilantes may supplement weak formal security provision. Their local knowledge, familiarity with community dynamics and ability to identify suspected criminals may allow them to respond where official institutions are perceived as slow or inaccessible. Fourchard's treatment of vigilantism as an indicator of the need for security-sector reform reinforces the idea that vigilantism may reveal institutional deficits.

Yet the existence of such limited functional benefits cannot resolve the legal problem of private coercion. The same characteristics that make informal groups responsive can make them dangerous. Their local knowledge can facilitate selective targeting; their organisational cohesion can support intimidation; and their independence from formal accountability mechanisms can permit excessive force. The International Crisis Group's analysis, as recorded in the research, recognises that vigilantes can undermine the State's exclusive authority over force, target ethnic groups, businesses or political opponents, and evolve into criminal organisations once the original security concern has diminished.

Chukwuma's analysis identifies serious adverse consequences associated with vigilante security, including excessive use of force, sexual violence, human-rights violations, extrajudicial killings, brutality, extortion and destruction of property. These consequences demonstrate why the State cannot treat vigilantism as a permanent parallel security system.

In Ghana, the national-security danger becomes particularly acute when political affiliation is added. A community vigilante may claim to protect a neighbourhood; a political vigilante may perceive opponents as threats to a party's interests. The resulting security logic is partisan rather than public. Once political competition is securitized in this way, ordinary electoral disagreement can be treated as an existential contest in which coercion appears justified.

The 2017 Delta Force incidents are illustrative because the reported assault on a Regional Security Coordinator and disruption of a court went beyond electoral campaigning. Such conduct directly challenges the State's capacity to appoint officials, administer justice and maintain institutional order. The danger is not merely injury to individuals; it is the message that organised political force can override public authority.

Similarly, attacks or intimidation around elections can compromise the freedom of political participation. The research records that vigilante activities have included threats, intimidation, physical aggression, attacks on electoral officials, disruption at registration centres, interference with electoral processes, intimidation of voters and other forms of electoral disorder. These acts can distort the conditions under which citizens express political preferences.

The long-term consequence is institutional distrust. If citizens perceive the police as politically influenced or unable to protect them, they may turn to partisan or community protection structures. If they perceive courts as vulnerable to intimidation, they may lose confidence in formal dispute resolution. Thus vigilantism can both be a symptom of institutional weakness and a mechanism through which that weakness is reproduced.

9. Vigilantism and Democratic Governance

The democratic implications of vigilantism deserve separate attention because elections are the principal arena in which political vigilantism becomes visible. Gyampo, Graham and Asare argue that political vigilantes have participated in all seven elections and three transitions since independence and have played both constructive and destructive roles.

The constructive side should not be ignored. Political activists may contribute to voter mobilisation, voter registration, polling assistance and campaign organisation. Such activities are ordinary components of democratic politics. The problem begins when political organisation is coupled with coercive capacity and when partisan loyalty is translated into intimidation or violence.

Afrobarometer evidence cited in the underlying research shows that public attitudes are complex. In 2012, respondents associated vigilante organisations with activities such as personal protection, interference with electoral processes, attacks on rival party members, disorder at polling stations, ballot-box theft and voter intimidation. Later survey findings recorded substantial public disapproval of attacks on government officials and State institutions and strong support for prosecution of unlawful groups. At the same time, a significant proportion of respondents accepted the idea that political supporters should receive compensation where their efforts contributed to electoral victory.

This apparent contradiction is important. Public condemnation of unlawful conduct can coexist with expectations of political reward. The latter expectation can sustain the political economy that gives vigilante groups influence after elections. Democratic consolidation therefore requires not only laws against violence but also political practices that separate legitimate party organisation from private coercive power.

10. Four Interlocking Strategies for Managing Political Vigilantism

10.1 Strengthen Law Enforcement and Legal Institutions

The first requirement is credible enforcement. Act 999 can only achieve its protective purpose if unlawful vigilantism is investigated and prosecuted consistently. Enforcement must be institutionally independent, professionally conducted and visibly even-handed. The research repeatedly connects vigilantism with distrust in police, courts and prosecution systems; therefore, every instance in which political affiliation appears to insulate unlawful conduct from legal consequences risks reinforcing the very conditions that generate vigilantism.

Strengthening institutions also means improving investigative capacity, prosecution, judicial protection and accountability. The objective should not be simply to arrest more people, but to establish a credible chain from complaint to investigation, prosecution and adjudication. Where citizens believe that lawful processes can produce timely and fair outcomes, the perceived necessity of private punishment declines.

10.2 Rebuild Police-Community Relations and Community Policing

Security is most sustainable when communities recognise law-enforcement institutions as legitimate providers of protection. The research therefore supports stronger police-civilian relationships and community policing. Community policing can address the demand side of vigilantism by creating structured channels through which residents communicate threats and security concerns without handing coercive authority to political groups.

The approach should not convert vigilante organisations into quasi-police units. Rather, it should make formal security institutions more responsive to the local knowledge that communities already possess. A properly accountable system can use community information while preserving the legal responsibility of police and other authorised institutions to investigate and enforce the law.

10.3 Address Youth Unemployment and the Socio-Economic Drivers

Punitive law cannot by itself eliminate the incentives that make political vigilantism attractive. The research repeatedly identifies youth unemployment, economic insecurity and expectations of political patronage as contributing factors. Sustainable prevention therefore requires employment opportunities, skills development, fair access to economic opportunities and political structures that give young people legitimate roles beyond mobilisation as 'foot soldiers'.

The socio-economic response should also address perceptions of unequal distribution of public resources. If political victory is understood as access to State resources for party supporters, the incentive for coercive political mobilisation becomes stronger. Transparent allocation of public opportunities and clear separation between party structures and State institutions are therefore relevant to security policy.

10.4 Public Education, Political Accountability and Early Intervention

Public education should make clear the difference between political activism and vigilantism. Citizens can support parties, campaign, organise and participate in elections without intimidating opponents or assuming policing and judicial functions. Political parties also have an important role in setting standards for their members and supporters.

Early intervention is essential. The experience described in the research suggests that groups can become entrenched if their activities are tolerated until violence escalates. Security institutions, electoral actors, civil society and political parties should therefore identify warning signs before groups become militarised or institutionalised. This is consistent with the research's emphasis on preventing vigilante organisations from evolving into more organised criminal structures.

Political accountability must extend beyond election day. If political actors reward coercive groups after elections, enforcement alone will struggle to dismantle the incentive structure. Conversely, if legitimate youth participation is encouraged while unlawful conduct is clearly sanctioned, political mobilisation can be separated from coercion.

11. The Difficult Question of State Tolerance

The research identifies a genuine policy dilemma. If vigilante groups are sometimes perceived as providing useful security where formal institutions are weak, an aggressive crackdown may produce community resistance. On the other hand, tolerance can entrench parallel structures and create a long-term challenge to State authority.

The appropriate distinction is between community participation in security and private coercion. States may cooperate with communities, receive information from residents and support lawful community-safety initiatives. That does not require recognition of partisan groups as alternative police forces. The State can therefore respond to the underlying security need without legitimising the unlawful mechanism through which the group seeks to satisfy it.

The research also considers two broad approaches: a confrontational strategy based on punitive measures and an inclusionary approach that seeks to engage former vigilantes through restorative and responsive measures. Neither should be understood in isolation. Enforcement is necessary where offences have occurred, while reintegration and socio-economic measures may be necessary to prevent recurrence. A sustainable policy combines accountability for unlawful conduct with credible alternatives to vigilantism.

12. Governance, Corruption and Institutional Incentives

An important lesson from the research is that vigilantism is partly a governance problem. Development programmes and institutional reforms may fail where corruption, inadequate funding and inequitable distribution of resources undermine public confidence. The OECD material cited in the study emphasises that development and capacity-building are constrained where security policy and institutional reforms do not address incentives, expectations, governance deficiencies and accountability.

This has direct relevance to political vigilantism. If citizens believe that access to employment, contracts, public facilities or appointments depends upon partisan connections, political competition becomes materially more consequential. Groups that perceive themselves as having delivered electoral victory may then expect preferential treatment. Addressing vigilantism therefore requires a governance framework in which State resources are administered as public resources rather than political spoils.

The relationship between security and development is reciprocal. Weak institutions generate insecurity; insecurity undermines investment and development; weak economic opportunities increase vulnerability to political mobilisation; and political mobilisation can further weaken institutions. The response to vigilantism must therefore be integrated into broader governance and human-security policy.

13. A Legal-Security Synthesis

The central insight from the Ghanaian experience is that political vigilantism is simultaneously a legal, security, political and socio-economic phenomenon. Its legal dimension concerns unlawful force and the displacement of formal institutions. Its security dimension concerns the safety of citizens and the authority of the State. Its political dimension concerns electoral competition, party organisation and political patronage. Its socio-economic dimension concerns unemployment, marginalisation and expectations of access to resources.

These dimensions cannot be addressed independently. A purely criminal-justice response may punish individuals without changing the incentives that generate recruitment. A purely developmental response may improve livelihoods while leaving violent political networks intact. A purely political response may produce party agreements without strengthening the institutions responsible for enforcement. And a purely security-driven response may suppress symptoms while leaving distrust of public institutions unresolved.

The law is therefore necessary but not sufficient. Act 999 provides the legal foundation for prohibiting vigilantism and related conduct, but the effectiveness of that legal framework depends upon credible institutions, fair enforcement and social conditions that make lawful security provision more attractive than private coercion.

The broader conception of national security adopted in this article also means that success cannot be measured only by the number of violent incidents prevented. It must include public confidence in police and courts, protection of electoral participation, preservation of public institutions, prevention of political intimidation and the capacity of the State to resolve disputes through law.

14. Conclusion

Political vigilantism in Ghana is neither a purely electoral phenomenon nor a simple substitute for crime control. It is a manifestation of the interaction between political mobilisation, institutional weakness, economic insecurity and perceptions about the ability of the State to provide security and justice. The research demonstrates that vigilante organisations can perform activities that resemble legitimate political participation or informal security provision, while also engaging in conduct capable of undermining the rule of law and democratic governance.

The enactment of the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act, 2019 (Act 999) is therefore an important legal response, but the statute should not be viewed as the complete solution. The deeper objective must be to restore the credibility of formal institutions so that citizens do not regard private political force as necessary or advantageous. Where police, courts and other institutions are accessible, effective and trusted, the social space in which vigilantism thrives is reduced.

Ghana's national-security response should consequently combine firm enforcement of the law with institutional reform, community policing, public education, political accountability and socio-economic measures directed at youth unemployment and marginalisation. The objective is not merely to eliminate a particular group of vigilantes, because new groups can emerge when the underlying incentives remain. The objective is to make vigilantism unnecessary, politically costly and socially unacceptable while preserving legitimate democratic participation.

The enduring lesson is that national security and the rule of law are not competing objectives. A State is most secure when its citizens trust lawful institutions to protect them and when political competition does not depend upon private coercive power. Political vigilantism becomes a national-security problem precisely when citizens, political actors or communities begin to believe that security, justice or political influence can be secured more effectively through organised force than through law. The most sustainable answer is therefore to strengthen the law and, at the same time, strengthen the institutions and social conditions that give the law practical legitimacy.

By
Solomon Adongo (LLM, Corporate And Commercial Law) University of Ghana School of Law

References and Authorities

Abrahams R, ‘Vigilant Citizens: Vigilantism and the State’ (1998).

Adinkrah M, ‘Vigilante Homicides in Contemporary Ghana’ (2004) 33 Journal of Criminal Justice 413.

Afua AG, ‘Vigilantism and Related Offences Bill, 2019’ (2019).

Akinyi M, ‘Children and Youth for Hire: A Case Study of the Sungu Sungu in Rural Kenya’ (2014) 19 Journal of Humanities and Social Science 161.

Alemika EE, ‘Civilian Oversight and Accountability of Police in Nigeria’ (2004).

Asamoah K, ‘Addressing the Problem of Political Vigilantism in Ghana through the Conceptual Lens of Wicked Problems’ (2020) 55 Journal of Asian and African Studies 457.

Babbie ER, ‘Research Design: The Practice of Social Research’ (2010).

Bateson R, ‘Crime Victimization and Political Participation’ (2021) 106 American Political Science Review 570.

Bekoe D, ‘Postelection Political Agreements in Togo and Zanzibar’, in D Bekoe (ed), Voting in Fear: Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa (2012) 117.

Bermeo N, ‘On Democratic Backsliding’ (2016) 27 Journal of Democracy 5.

Birikorang E and Aning K, ‘Negotiating Populism and Populist Politics in Ghana, 1949–2012’, in Managing Election-Related Violence for Democratic Stability in Ghana.

Bob-Milliar GM, ‘Place and Party Organizations: Party Activism inside Party-Branded Sheds at the Grassroots in Northern Ghana’ (2014) Territory, Politics, Governance 1.

Buzan B, ‘New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century’ (1991) 67 International Affairs 431.

Caldeira TP and Holston J, ‘Democracy and Violence in Brazil’ (1999) 41 Latin American Politics and Society 691.

Candy G, ‘Conceptualizing Vigilantism’ (2012) Focaal 64, 129.

Chisanga B, ‘Understanding the Cadre, Party Politics’ (2018).

Chukwuma O, ‘Nigeria: Volunteer Vigilantism and Counter-Insurgency in the North-East’ (2017) Conflict Studies Quarterly 20.

CODEO, Post-Election Environment Observation Report (2017).

Daddieh C and Bob-Milliar GM, ‘In Search of “Honorable” Membership: Parliamentary Primaries and Candidate Selection in Ghana’ (2012) 47 Journal of Asian and African Studies 204.

Darko T, ‘How Does Government Responsiveness Come About? The Politics of Accountability’ (2016).

Fourchard L, ‘Lagos, Koolhaas and Partisan Politics in Nigeria’ (2011) 117 International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 62.

Fleisher ML, ‘Kuria Cattle Raiders: Violence and Vigilantism on the Tanzania/Kenya Frontier’ (2000) 29 University of Michigan Press 198.

Goldstein DM, ‘In Our Own Hands: Lynching, Justice, and the Law in Bolivia’ (2003) 30 American Ethnologist 22.

Gyampo RE, Graham E and Asare BE, ‘Political Vigilantism and Democratic Governance in Ghana’s Fourth Republic’ (2017) 44 The African Review 112.

International Crisis Group, ‘December 2017’ (2017).

Johnston L, ‘What Is Vigilantism?’ (1996) 36 British Journal of Criminology 220.

Kantor A and Persson M, ‘Understanding Vigilantism: Informal Security Providers and Security Sector Reform in Liberia’ (2010).

Krause K and Williams MC, ‘Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods’ (1996) 40 Mershon International Studies Review 229.

Kumah-Abiwu F, ‘Issue Framing and Electoral Violence in Ghana: A Conceptual Analysis’ (2017) 55 Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 165.

Kwarkye S, ‘Political Vigilantism Threatens Stability in Ghana’ (2018) Institute for Security Studies.

Kyei O, ‘Political Vigilante Groups in Ghana: Violence or Democracy?’ Africa Spectrum 55(3) 321.

Lasswell HD, ‘National Security and Individual Freedom’ (1950).

Lindberg SI, ‘The Surprising Significance of African Elections’ (2006) 17 Journal of Democracy 139.

Lippmann W, ‘US Foreign Policy: Shield of the Republic’ (1943).

Marshall C and Rossman G, Designing Qualitative Research (3rd edn, Sage 1990).

Masese RE and Mwenzwa E, ‘The Genesis and Evolution of Sungusungu Vigilante Group among the Abagusii Ethnic Group of Kenya’ (2012) 3 Elixir Social Sciences 6485.

Moumouni AI, ‘L’offre Informelle de La Sécurité Publique Au Bénin: L’instrumentalisation Des Groupes d’Autodéfense Par L’État’ (2017) Déviance et Société 1, 91.

Murray O, ‘The Culture of the Symposion’, in A Companion to Archaic Greece (2009) 508.

Nina D, The Other Law: Non-State Ordering in South Africa (Juta).

Nivette AE, ‘Institutional Ineffectiveness, Illegitimacy, and Public Support for Vigilantism in Latin America’ (2016) 54 Criminology 142.

Nyiayaana K, ‘Voting without Choosing: Ethnic Voting Behaviour and Voting Patterns in Nigeria’ (2015) 79–112.

Ochoa JA and Tomas CL, ‘Democracy and Vigilantism: The Case of Michoacán, Mexico’ (2016) 5 International Journal for Democracy 17.

OECD, OECD Annual Report 2007.
Okoli Chukwuma, ‘Nigeria: Volunteer Vigilantism and Counter-Insurgency in the North-East’ (2017) Conflict Studies Quarterly 20.

Oyagi DH, ‘The Role of Vigilante Groups in the Management of Security in Urban Centres: A Case Study of Sungusungu in Suneka Township, Kisii County’ (PhD dissertation, University of Nairobi 2016).

Parliament of Ghana, Vigilantism and Related Offences Act, 2019 (Act 999).

Phillips BJ, ‘Inequality and the Emergence of Vigilante Organizations: The Case of Mexican Autodefensas’ (2017) 50 Comparative Political Studies 1358.

Pratten D, ‘The Politics of Protection: Perspectives on Vigilantism in Nigeria’ (2008) 78 Africa 1.

Rosenbaum HJ and Sederberg PC, Vigilante Politics (University of Pennsylvania Press).

Rotberg RI, Crafting the New Nigeria: Confronting the Challenges (Lynne Rienner Publishers 2004).

Sarantakos S, Social Research (Bloomsbury 1993).

Schuberth M, ‘Challenging the Weak States Hypothesis: Vigilantism in South Africa and Brazil’ (2013) 20 Journal of Peace, Conflict & Development 38.

Seekings J, ‘Democracy and Distribution in Highly Unequal Economies: The Case of South Africa’ (2001) 39 Journal of Modern African Studies 471.

Silke A, ‘The Devil You Know: Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism’ (2001) 13 Terrorism and Political Violence 1.

Smith DJ, ‘The Bakassi Boys: Vigilantism, Violence, and Political Imagination in Nigeria’ (2004) 19 Cultural Anthropology 429.

Suzette A, ‘Africa in the News’ (PhD dissertation 2005).

Teddlie C and Tashakkori A, ‘Issues and Dilemmas in Teaching Research Methods Courses in Social and Behavioural Sciences’ (2003) 6 International Journal of Social Research Methodology 61.

Walliman N, Your Research Project: Designing and Planning Your Work (Sage 2011).

Wilkinson C, ‘The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is Securitization Theory Useable Outside Europe?’ (2007) 38 Security Dialogue 5.

World Bank/Bank of Ghana, Landscape of Jobs in Ghana (2016).