Beatrice Annan, the Deputy Spokesperson for the John Mahama Campaign, has sharply criticized the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Speaker Alban Bagbin's declaration of four parliamentary seats as vacant.
Annan accused the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, of aligning with the New Patriotic Party (NPP), asserting that the ruling would not stand the test of time and would be viewed unfavourably in the future.
Speaking on The Big Issue with Selorm Adonoo on Channel One TV, she argued that the Supreme Court missed a crucial opportunity to strengthen and uphold Ghana’s democratic principles.
“[Ruling] it gives credence to the perception that this Court [Supreme] and the Torkornoo [Chief Justice Her Ladyship Gertrude Torkornoo] led court is only interested in doing the political bidding of the NPP. I think that once again, the Supreme Court missed a golden opportunity to uphold and advance our democracy. And they missed one of the greatest opportunities that will consolidate our democratic gains. What we have is not beautiful.”
She argued that the Supreme Court failed in its attempt to justify the outcome desired by the executive.
“They didn’t do the country proud, I think that if lawyers in other jurisdictions and common law in other jurisdictions take this decision, I’m clear in their minds that anybody would come to one conclusion that the executive wanted a particular outcome. And the judges struggled to justify that outcome. And you could see from when they wanted to go on the tangent of purposive interpretations.”
However, in a sharp rebuttal, the Member of Parliament for Abuakwa South, Samuel Atta-Akyea, who was also a panel member on Channel One TV’s political show dismissed her claims, labelling them as “distasteful”.
He asserted that the rule of law prevailed. On Tuesday, November 12, the Supreme Court overturned Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin's decision to declare four parliamentary seats vacant, ruling in favour of a challenge brought by Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin.
In its detailed judgment released on Thursday, November 14, The five justices who sided with the Majority Leader clarified that a parliamentary seat can only be declared vacant if a lawmaker switches political parties while retaining their position in Parliament.
The ruling further stated that the Speaker's decision could not take effect within the current parliamentary term.
However, two dissenting justices argued that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the case, highlighting a divide in the interpretation of the Court's authority on such matters.
-CitiNewsroom



Martin Amidu points to $3million in 2016–2017 transfers in Asante Berko bribery ...
Man arrested for flogging two-year-old daughter after she failed to greet him
'I am sure of myself': A look back at Dolly Parton's unspoken feminist legacy
Joint police-military operation arrests 11 suspects at Kromase
Ghana’s public debt rises to GH¢719.52bn by June 2026
“Powder Guy” denies $32,000 visa fraud
'You'll be dismissed if you come to work smelling alcohol' — Bagbin warns parlia...
'Homeless' Barosky ready to return home after Ghana's High Commissioner to UK vi...
How Nwawasua residents climb trees and mountains top in search of good internet ...
We cannot allow poor performance, teenage pregnancy to undermine our children's ...
Comments
Ei!! everybody de talk so you too de talk some There is indeed freedom in Ghana:AMPA: