The Hypocrisy of Kamala Harris' Abortion Advocacy: The US Should Reject Her Candidacy to Save Lives

In a stunning display of irony, Kamala Harris, a prominent advocate for unrestricted abortion access, stands as a living testament to the value of human life. Had her mother chosen to abort her, Harris would not have been present to champion the very procedure that would have ended her own existence. This glaring contradiction highlights the inherent flaws in the abortion debate.

Renowned neurosurgeon and former presidential candidate, Dr. Ben Carson, astutely observes, "If we can't protect the most vulnerable among us, we're not protecting human rights at all" (1). The unborn child, just like Harris, possesses inherent dignity and worth, deserving of protection and respect.

International human rights instruments unequivocally recognize the right to life and protection of the unborn child. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) asserts, "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person" (Article 3). Similarly, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) affirms, "Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law" (Article 6).

In the United States, laws acknowledge the unborn child's right to life and protection:

• The Unborn Victims of Violence Act (2004) recognizes the unborn child as a victim of federal crimes.
• The Hyde Amendment (1976) prohibits federal funding for abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or when the mother's life is at risk.
• The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (2002) ensures that infants born alive during an abortion receive medical care and legal protection.

Furthermore, other national laws recognize the unborn child's right to life, including:

• Canada's Criminal Code (Section 223)
• Australia's Crimes Act (Section 4)
• India's Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (2012)

Notably, even some Democratic presidents have acknowledged the value of human life. President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, has spoken out against abortion, stating, "I have always believed that Jesus Christ would approve of using a loving, tender approach to help girls and women who are pregnant under difficult circumstances" (2).

Additionally, some prominent Democrats have personal experiences that highlight the value of human life. For example, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, a Republican appointee but raised by his Democratic mother, has spoken about how his mother considered aborting him but chose to give him life instead (3).

Moreover, the consequences of abortion are far-reaching and devastating. Abortion has been linked to increased rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts in women. The physical toll of abortion is also significant, with risks of uterine perforation, infection, and infertility.

In conclusion, Harris' advocacy for abortion recklessly disregards the inherent value of human life, including her own. Rather than championing a procedure that would have prevented her own existence, we must focus on empowering women and protecting the vulnerable. As President Trump has emphasized, we must prioritize the sanctity of human life and recognize the inherent value of every individual, born and unborn.

Furthermore, we must also acknowledge the disproportionate impact of abortion on marginalized communities. The abortion industry disproportionately targets African American and Hispanic communities, perpetuating systemic racism and discrimination.

Ultimately, the abortion debate is not about reproductive freedom, but about the value and dignity of human life. We must choose to protect and cherish life, rather than destroying it. As Dr. Carson so eloquently states, "We must recognize the inherent value of every human life, from conception to natural death" (1).

If Kamala Harris is elected, the consequences could be far-reaching and detrimental to the sanctity of human life. Her unwavering support for unrestricted abortion access and disregard for the inherent value of human life pose a significant threat to the vulnerable.

US voters should fear that a Kamala Harris presidency would:

• Erase protections for the unborn, leaving them vulnerable to abortion at any stage
• Undermine women's health by neglecting the physical and emotional well-being of women
• Disregard human dignity, setting a dangerous precedent for devaluing vulnerable populations

US voters should disregard Kamala Harris' candidacy because her abortion advocacy:

• Ignores the value of human life, including her own
• Fails to address the root causes of unplanned pregnancies
• Prioritizes a political ideology over human dignity and well-being

By electing Kamala Harris, voters would be endorsing a dangerous and extreme abortion agenda that would have far-reaching consequences for the vulnerable and the sanctity of human life.

SeLaH!!!
References:

1. Carson, B. (2016). A More Perfect Union. Sentinel.
2. Carter, J. (2012). Our Enduring Values: America's Moral Crisis. Simon & Schuster.
3. Thomas, C. (2007). My Grandfather's Son: A Memoir. HarperCollins.

Nana Yaw Boakye Yiadom Opoku Agyemang (N.Y.B.Y.O.A.), Global Affairs Expert

+233 (0) 243065430
+233 (0) 577065410
[email protected]

[email protected]