Pervert or Anti-Pervert Glasses?

War-war! Apparently, they have been fighting me or my mission without my knowledge or fighting back? Recently, I mentioned how the BBC described the much needed glasses as 'Pervert glasses', but after little research this morning, I discovered countless folks are using the term 'Pervert glasses'. So I might as well call them BBC and cohorts, at least in this article. Some businesses banned them, some are even calling on the questionable politicians to ban public recording in public places? Well, I am the one who begs God for a worldwide culture of cameras, including body cameras for civilians. Cameras are arguably among the top three man-made blessings for humans, so it puzzles me how the devils are convincing the naive cowards or general populace to fear cameras? Considering the huge sexual problems of the world, especially the West, by labelling them 'Pervert', they may essentially convince countless people until the truth comes face to face with lies or the liars. So brace-up, choose a side, because poor Jarga is ready to defeat rich BBC and cohorts. I think society must learn to adapt graciously, because a strong culture of cameras is almost inevitable. Me and the good folks want to speed it up, the bad guys want to delay it, using fear mongering tactics and even laws, if we allow them.

Levels of Perverts: Fractional facts, fractional seeing, or biased reporting have been a problem for humankind, including the media. This is why this paragraph may arguably be the most important paragraph to those willing to learn. You may have a pervert at thought level, or let's call them pervert level one. A pervert level two will operate at the level of words. Then, level three is primarily about actions. I am not interested in repeating their accusations, but I want you to deeply reflect on the mentioned three levels. So when a level two 'pervert' uses smart glasses to record a 'questionable' woman in public and put it on social media, the bridge between level one and two gets activated. Rather than telling everyone to assume you are being recorded in public by the NSA or xyz, they want us to close our eyes from level three and countless other things outside sexual matters? Well, sex is number one or everything in the extreme matriarchal world of the west+. Whatever problems you may have at these lower levels should be confronted through sensitization for adaptability and regulations on commercial usage of others' image. Bring Lovism, Get rid of capitalism and certain injustices, these problems will no longer exist.

Switch to level three Perverts: Every real pervert would hate a strong culture of cameras , and this is why cameras should be marketed as an anti-pervert blessing. I will not waste too much time here, except offer you a challenge. A town, country, continent, or world with a strong culture of cameras will be the worst nightmare for the real perverts, level three perverts.

Although not preferred, men who watch such videos must be seen as losers, but not the worst of men. If such street videos can reduce porn watching, drugs, rape, alcohol, gambling, etc, then accept it as lesser evil, and fight it smartly, not recklessly. Educate them and help them evolve. A well educated person or who gets quality loving is less likely to spend more than ten seconds on a video of a man trying to get a woman. Also once we ban commercialisation of such, at least 50% will not exist, or who will doubt money motivates some of them?

Harassment and Women: Among the allegations I saw on the internet is harassment through such cameras. We have to see cameras as a form of power or blessing, so the good must seek it more than the evil folks. You can wish for a dying old world or help usher-in the peaceful world of no lying, nor cruelty. They claim men or a fraction of men are buying the cameras and abusing them? I doubt if even five percent of men own body cameras, because I see both genders using phones to record protests. Well, let women and the best of men buy countless body cameras as 'anti-harassment glasses', camera belts , camera-shoes, chains, etc. If about four billion females and even two billion men start wearing enough body cameras, then how many men dare harass after a no? The shame and the laws will have effects. Even the worst of liars will admit a strong culture of cameras will put a big dent to public harassment. Our definition of harassment may differ, because asking should not be a crime, but persisting after a no is worse than the 'perverts' and those who enable 'perverts' by rejecting a huge blessing. Ch.55: 'Which one of the blessings/favors of Your Lord will you deny [yourself and/or others]?' Cameras-cameras-cameras. Lying but trusted BBC and cohorts call them 'Pervert glasses' so millions of immature or under-thinking males and females hate to be suspected as 'perverts' -- so they deny themselves the blessings in fear. I told you fear is a disease, and if not cured, it turns to greed or arrogance. So another group of them arrogantly want to deny us the blessings of cameras in public places? Cameras in public places will certainly help more than guns in public places, so fight for that right more than the good or crazy Americans fight for the second amendment (gun rights).

God-given rights must be seen as every good, including good man-made things through learning+. Folks like me have written to God: 'You may give the devils respite, but please not at my expense.' Then God responded with: 'I am giving you cameras+ to fight sins between creatures and do not obey the devils as per ch.76, but 'exhort each other to truth...' as per ch.103. Do not allow your questionable politicians to waste your tax dollars on weapons, infrastructures for mainly the elite, etc above cameras for all. Our ancestors suffered more than us in some ways, and the best of them wished for things like cameras. We cannot allow cowards to appeal to fellow cowards and the arrogant to deny us such huge blessings. They may use things like privacy, but tell them 'public places demand public responsibility'. This should not be the age of assumptions or blind trust, but evidence based age. Every woman+ has the right to wear what may deter evil men or gather evidence in public spaces; so the worst of women+ cannot be too loud to deny her that right. Every man+ has the right to gather evidence that may save him where women are totally or largely trusted based on only claims. If she claims you harassed her after a no, do not rush to reveal the video. Similarly, to the females. The videos are not just against the liars and cruel ones, but those who reject the truth. It is a complex term, but rejecting truth is actually the worst crime and slightly different from even regular intentional lies. By allowing claims versus claims until the jury or judge decides based on assumptions or blind trust, then the videos should roll out. Well, after a strong culture of cameras, many liars will have no option but to understand 'no more respite for devils' is the best prayer that God is slowly answering and humans are hardly making. I love these articles, except I will prefer God acting more, giving me enormous victories, enormous achievements, defeating big to biggest devils even on earth.

Other gadgets: Although I tend to use the term 'a strong culture of cameras ', other tiny audio recording gadgets to establish justice are vital, part of the prayers, and part of what you should buy, urge others, and refuse governments banning them. I am doubting they may care for even guilty women, but the worst of politicians understand a strong culture of cameras and tiny recording devices that record for a decade or more will harm 'the friends of Trump', Barrow, Tinubu, MBS, etc.

The Banning Dilemma: Private Businesses will have the right to ban or allow such under my government. However, what messages are we sending to both the businesses and the customers? Public places tend to have occasional problems, so mandating some form of recording can help more than potential harm. The businesses that may ban customers from body cameras are still likely to record you, and an employee or hacker can still use it. So my advice to private citizens is to be presidential in public places, and fight only against commercialisation of your images. The recordings are inevitable and sometimes you will be glad they record you. When you walk down the streets, smart homes and businesses are recording you without your knowledge or so-called 'consent'. Do you remember the recordings of the guy who physically confronted the gunman (terrorist) in Australia, if my memory serves me right? Thanks to those recordings, or that guy would not have been rewarded well, or help our precious learning. I think the owner of those cameras deserve reward, not potential suing of 'no consent before recording' or releasing. Public interest or justice demanded the release. Because five to xyz percent of cowardly women+ fear level two types of perverts should never mean we abandoned a blessing that will save millions of men and women in different ways. The age of truth is here, and cameras are products of truth, products for the Godly.

Cameras were supposed to be subsidised or at least encouraged through urgings, so let the debate be on that. Wealthy governments and rich folks should help realize worldwide culture of cameras.

So I want the BBC and cohorts to repent beyond words, but with actions. Invite me to debate the top three anti body cameras folks. Urge the governments, rich folks, and all working folks to buy the anti-pervert cameras, anti-adultery cameras, anti-harassment cameras, etc. Then on actions, you can dedicate a few millions to encourage buying and usage. I am fairly certain that footage of such cameras was used in positive ways, so don't be ungrateful or one-eyed. If the BBC offered one million dollars lottery reward to the Gambia, UK, or xyz, then mass buying may exist, including the cowardly capitalist who were convinced otherwise on cameras. Use your cameras to deter crimes for God to pay, or to help solve crimes for even good folks to pay you through fine sharing and entering you in a special lottery to win one million dollars or more.

I bet you 'poor Gambians' may then beg relatives in the diaspora to send them cameras over clothes; or which mass body camera buying from China will come with good spin-offs for the Gambia? A few years ago, a questionable media house in the UK wrongly claimed the Gambia were selling young girls for a dollar or so. I strongly reacted then, that the Gambia government should sue them. First, they were lying; secondly, they were hinting to perverts to explore the Gambia, endangering us. If the Gambia or any country employs a strong culture of cameras, including body cameras and hidden cameras, which British or xyz Pervert would hate it? After waking me up last night, inspiring the title of the article, then pushed me to go out. Driving in different neighbourhoods in my small Gambia, I saw countless street prostitutes but they were largely in their thirties. Although I was not smart enough to ask their rates for writing purposes, but I can guess they may be asking ten or twenty fold what the questionable media claimed. My point is a strong culture of cameras can eliminate or strongly reduce street prostitution. So we can call them anti-prostitution glasses. They will prefer how to shame and punish men, but cameras will be gender neutral. The questionable Imam or pastor will be more careful, because some women will out them.

Research or experiment: The Gambia is already largely peaceful, but cameras can further reduce our crimes and uplift our character. So pump about 24 million body cameras in tiny Gambia and study the impact. Do not use one brand or type. How many body cameras will each willing citizen want, plus vehicle cameras, plus home and business cameras. I believe cameras will even force better ways to reduce health problems, and reduce the good or questionable work of the Medical Research Council (MRC). Our maids, street vendors, etc will adjust. So cameras can help on character, health, and wealth; but please don't expect the deaf, dumb, or blind cowards to accept cameras. So we must use the willing to confront the unwilling. We should use the money of convicted rich folks to buy body cameras for the poor, not just reward questionable women. From Epstein, Diddy, Weinstein, etc we should be able to gather a few billions. Choose three poor countries and three rich states as an experiment. Will Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Ms. Scott, etc be willing to help sponsor such research, experiment, or speeding-up the inevitable? Will the rich Arabs help, at least the poorer Arab countries? As long as we allow mainstream media to label such blessings as 'Pervert glasses', then almost no rich person may dare such sponsoring. This is why we must strongly fight back the BBC and cohorts around the world. Once we start calling them 'anti-harassment' glasses, then even the rich perverts may offer it more than vaccines and weapons as donations. Do you think ten, fifty, or how many Camera factories can a great billionaire buy for a strong worldwide culture of cameras, if they truly love women+?

Accordingly, I am urging camera manufacturers, influencers, reviewers, and ordinary caring folks to share this article as 'angels of God'. Finally fighting back against the devils, who were lying or just in illusions? Sometimes, we have to consider suing mediahouses, especially big ones like the BBC. It is not just financial lost to those in such businesses, but individuals can reveal how they are endangering in different ways. A dummy may now think ‘recording without consent’ in public places is a huge crime, and punch or shoot you for having body cameras? Their weak position also means slower to get to ‘herd immunity’. You need at least 75% of people wearing body cameras to scare enough people in many countries. They are deterring your neighbours from buying, rather than helping to deter criminals?

Jarga, you promised us war-war, but you were largely gentle, can you heat it up a little bit? In the spirit of trying to save millions of people, regardless of gender: hey! Heyy!! Heyyy!!! May God proportionately curse anyone who tries to slow down a strong worldwide culture of cameras. May God bless those who call them anti-pervert or anti-harassment glasses over those who call them pervert glasses. A girl or boy does not become a pervert just by wearing such, but its mass acceptance will terrify perverts. We will see automatic drops in harassment beyond sex. If every tourist or most tourists in the Gambia or xyz wears such body cameras and certain laws exist, who will dare harass tourists to be shamed on social media and the laws put to test for more or less tourists?

We can certainly agree cameras will do more good than harm or only seeming harm. I can write much more, but I wish the Lord of achievements gives me achievements to my satisfaction and far beyond words or everything he ever gave me so far. I want to see an unprecedented defeat of the devils worldwide. No lawyer , politician, journalist, etc can challenge my facts, face to face. Your sharing can scare them from repeating or echoing the illusory short-sighted terms. May God bless Showlove Trinity: let's learn, let's work, let's have fun.

By Jarga Kebba Gigo
An Activist and Transformer
Author of Juts Quhr-aahn
Optional Notes:
Although I tried to keep the article to the title, sexual, but the real fight is much deeper. It is vital for the best of humans to fight back hard enough and on time. Journalists (the media) are our best friends but also our worst enemies. Sometimes they side with the devils, knowingly or unknowingly. If we allow the devils to win the information war, it becomes much harder to reverse course.

Unchallenged illusions become facts, at least temporarily. They understand people tend to sympathise with women, so they are using a fraction of women, but their real agenda or impact can be much worse. They used women to even rally for war. We must rally the best of women and even God to help us defeat them asap. For example, we have seen how Florida bans the recording of even abusive cops. Smart folks were supposed to fight such, and they may understand that a strong culture of cameras can undo such terrible laws. If all or most Floridians wear body cameras, they will not switch off their cameras in fear. The judges will then side with us, the public. However, if they win the information war, then politicians will start banning cameras in the name of protecting women, and Judges will comply until they are smartly challenged.

Although we want God to help all, no one deserves to be victims more than those who fear or reject cameras. Let them in situations where they wished it was recorded.

We must quickly have a strong team of pro cameras, right to record in public places for self usage and justice. I am not a big fan of Meta, but we must understand countless other companies are now making smart glasses, so abuse of information by Meta is just a fear tactic. Educate all your loved ones on how to adapt for the new age. For every so-called viral video is also a learning opportunity for adaptation possibilities.

I understand the women may be harder to get, but men, companies, and even governments can try new ideas. For example, monthly or periodic verified single meet-ups physically can help on such. Women should not be ashamed of sex, but how both genders can be more sincere, more grateful, etc. If we gauge other benefits, including the safety of women, perhaps our fears of ‘hard to get women’ may not exist. It is very possible for cameras to uplift human sexual lives. Even where we see temporal negative effects, let's study where to adjust and never reject cameras in public places.

A stronger culture of cameras can reduce even wars. Explaining certain things can make it lengthy, but trust me: from the robbing devils to the sexual devils, they hate cameras. It is the human ‘angels’ or potential angels who sadly fear what would greatly help. Do not worry where cameras seemingly failed us. Me and you cannot gauge, but only estimate. So if cameras help deter million crimes against women+, help solve thousands of crimes against women, then only the one-eyed ungrateful folks will focus on the hundreds of women it may hurt for millions to learn…