
The Humanist Enabling Life Project (HELP) welcomes the recent announcement by the Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) to ease its position on blood transfusion. The shift brings relief to long-suffering members who need blood transfusions around the globe. But going by the details of the release, the move did not go far enough. JW policy on blood transfusion still poses a serious threat to public health worldwide.
In a press statement issued on its website on September 18, 2026, The Governing Body of JW announced that "the decision to accept red cells, white cells, plasma or platelets from another person’s blood is a matter of personal conscience". It also stated that each member would "decide whether or not to donate blood for the clearly expressed purpose of providing components or fractions for use by another person". Then it stated, "The long-standing refusal of whole-blood transfusions on religious grounds, a core teaching based on the command to ‘abstain from blood’ (Acts 15:20), is unchanged".
Jehovah's Witnesses should stop approbating and reprobating on blood transfusion. Its ban on blood transfusion is a harmful health policy that has had a adverse health effect on people. Jehovah's Witnesses should acknowledge that they have erred and misled their members over the years. JW should issue an express apology for this vicious policy and the damage it has caused. Stating that the organisation still maintains its ban on blood transfusion while allowing it on personal grounds is confusing. It is an indication that the Jehovah's Witnesses have not realized their grievous mistake. Jehovah's Witnesses' controversial and despicable policy on blood transfusion has cost so many lives. The policy has led to the death and health impairment of many people around the globe.
Last year, HELP applauded the Basic Rights Counsel for obtaining a court order to treat a baby who needed a blood transfusion in Calabar, Nigeria. HELP was told that Jehovah's Witnesses officers at the clinic connived and pressured the parent to get the baby discharged against medical advice. No one knows what eventually happened to the baby; whether the baby died or survived. There have been many cases where children died because their JW parents or family members denied them blood transfusion.
HELP does not want a JW ease on the prohibition on blood transfusion. Jehovah's Witnesses should rescind the ban without reservation and apologize to the world.
Leo Igwe directs the Humanist Enabling Life Project



'Ghana should also organise midterm elections to boot out lazy MPs' – Solomon Ow...
Learn AI or risk being left behind – A Plus advises Ghanaians
‘We tasted death’ – Lil Win recounts terrifying PassionAir flight incident with ...
I wouldn’t be surprised if motorists challenge TraffiTech-GH in court – Martin K...
Ghana demand justice over second citizen killed in New York within a week
TraffiTech-GH: 'If the fines are too expensive, then do not speed' – Mahama
Roads not perfect in UK yet they have speed cameras; we can't wait for perfect r...
Council of State needs revamp — Cletus Avoka
GFA President urges Parliament to reverse ban on alcohol sponsorship of sports
Minority accuses Bagbin of parliamentary bullying over Jinapor’s ejection

Comments
I read this article with interest. While I respect Mr Igwe's right to share his views, his article misses some very important facts about modern medicine and public health. First, the article claims that allowing blood parts (like red cells, white cells, or plasma) while refusing "whole blood" is confusing. But this is actually exactly how modern hospitals work. Doctors rarely use whole blood anymore. They separate blood into parts to treat specific needs and save resources. The Wit...