There is a profound principle in spirituality that is often overlooked: God did not give human beings unlimited authority to sit in His place and determine the ultimate fate of other people.
Scripture repeatedly presents God as the final Judge and reserves vengeance to Him. Deuteronomy 32:35 declares, “Vengeance is mine, and recompence,” while Romans 12:19 repeats the principle: “Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.”
This does not mean that human beings have no responsibility to recognize wrongdoing, establish accountability, correct harmful behavior, or administer justice. Human societies require laws, courts, families, communities, and institutions of accountability. Rather, it means that no human authority possesses the complete knowledge, wisdom, righteousness, and sovereignty required to occupy the ultimate judgment seat that belongs to God.
This distinction becomes especially important when certain people or organizations who claimed to be spiritual leaders, religious organizations, or self-appointed authorities begin to believe that their delusional thoughts gives them the right to determine another person's worth, destiny, punishment, or relationship with God.
The question, therefore, is worth asking:
1. God Knows What Human Beings Cannot Fully Know
Human judgment is necessarily limited.
A person may see an action, hear an accusation, receive a report, or observe a particular behavior. But seeing an event is not the same as knowing everything that produced it.
Behind every human action there may be circumstances, history, motives, pressures, fears, misunderstandings, relationships, injuries, intentions, and consequences that are invisible to the observer.
Two people may witness the same event and interpret it differently because neither possesses the complete picture.
God, however, is presented in Scripture as one who sees beyond outward appearance and examines the heart. First Samuel 16:7 states that while human beings look at outward appearance, the Lord looks at the heart.
This is one reason human beings must approach judgment with humility.
A person may be convinced that they know the truth while possessing only a fraction of the information necessary to understand the situation.
This becomes dangerous when certainty replaces investigation.
Someone hears an accusation and immediately accepts it. Another person repeats it. A religious authority then interprets it spiritually. Before the accused person has even spoken, a judgment has already been formed.
The process can become even more dangerous when the authority claims that the judgment came directly from God.
At that point, ordinary disagreement becomes extremely difficult because questioning the human authority is made to appear as though one is questioning God Himself.
But the limitation remains:
A human being does not become omniscient merely because they occupy a religious or any coercive group position.
A title does not create perfect knowledge. A spiritual office does not eliminate human limitations. Religious language does not make an imperfect judgment infallible.
That is why humility must accompany spiritual authority.
2. Perfect Judgment Requires Perfect Wisdom
Knowledge alone is not enough.
Even when facts are available, they still have to be interpreted correctly.
Human beings can possess information and still misunderstand its meaning.
They can know what happened but misunderstand why it happened.
They can identify an action but misunderstand the circumstances surrounding it.
They can discover wrongdoing but respond with disproportionate punishment.
They can also mistake weakness for rebellion, suffering for disobedience, questioning for disrespect, or self-protection for hostility.
Divine judgment, in the biblical understanding, is different because God's wisdom is not limited in the way human wisdom is limited.
This is why the Apostle Paul asks in Romans 11:33:
“Oh the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God!”
The point is not that human beings should abandon discernment. The point is that human discernment should never become arrogant enough to assume that it is equal to divine knowledge and wisdom.
A spiritually mature person should therefore be capable of saying:
“I may not know everything.”
That sentence is not weakness.
It is wisdom.
The person who recognizes the limits of their knowledge is less likely to destroy another person through premature judgment.
3. God Is Not Supposed to Judge From Self-Interest
Another problem with human judgment is that human beings have interests.
People can become angry. They can become jealous. They can feel betrayed. They can protect friends and attack enemies. They can interpret situations according to what benefits them.
Even people who sincerely believe they are acting righteously can be influenced by emotions and personal relationships.
This is particularly dangerous within groups.
Suppose a powerful member of an organization accuses another person. The leadership already trusts the accuser. The accused person has little influence. The group hears only one account and begins acting against the accused.
The resulting judgment may appear spiritual because religious language surrounds it.
But spiritual language does not automatically make a process just.
The real question should be:
Was the matter examined fairly?
Were competing accounts considered?
Was evidence examined?
Was the accused given an opportunity to respond?
Were the decision-makers free from conflicts of interest?
Was the punishment proportional to the alleged wrongdoing?
These questions matter because justice becomes distorted when personal interests are allowed to control judgment.
God's judgment, as understood in Scripture, is not dependent upon popularity, political influence, financial benefit, family connections, or group loyalty.
Human beings, however, can be.
Therefore, anyone exercising authority over another person's life should be conscious of this danger.
4. Reserving Vengeance Prevents Personal Retaliation From Becoming “Justice”
There is an important difference between justice and vengeance.
Justice seeks what is right.
Vengeance can become an expression of personal retaliation.
A person who has been hurt may want the offender to suffer. Someone who has been embarrassed may want to destroy the person who embarrassed them. Someone who has lost status may seek revenge against the person they believe caused the loss.
When such desires are placed inside a spiritual system, retaliation can be given a sacred appearance.
A person may say:
“God will deal with you.”
But sometimes what follows is not God's judgment at all. It is human anger wearing religious clothing.
This is precisely why the biblical principle of leaving vengeance to God is so important.
It places a boundary around human anger.
It tells the injured person:
You do not have to become the judge, jury, and executioner of the person who hurt you.
You can seek legitimate justice without turning your pain into permission to destroy another human being.
This principle protects both the victim and the accused.
It protects the victim from becoming consumed by revenge, and it protects the accused from arbitrary punishment administered by people who may be acting from emotion rather than truth.
5. Human Beings Are Morally Imperfect
Another reason for humility is simple: human beings themselves are imperfect.
Jesus strongly challenged religious hypocrisy when He warned against focusing on the speck in another person's eye while ignoring the beam in one's own eye (Matthew 7:3–5).
His teaching does not mean that wrongdoing should never be confronted. Rather, it challenges the arrogance of people who condemn others while refusing to examine themselves.
This is an important distinction.
There is a difference between accountability and self-righteousness.
Accountability asks:
“What happened, and what should be done?”
Self-righteousness asks:
“How can I establish myself as morally superior to this person?”
The first can protect society.
The second can destroy people.
Anyone who exercises spiritual authority should therefore examine their own motives before attempting to correct another person.
Am I seeking truth?
Am I protecting someone from harm?
Am I restoring what can be restored?
Am I acting fairly?
Or am I angry?
Am I jealous?
Am I protecting my position?
Am I responding to someone else's accusation without independently examining it?
These questions are not signs of weak faith.
They are safeguards against spiritual arrogance.
6. The Danger of Playing God
The greatest danger begins when human beings stop saying, “I believe I understand this situation,” and begin saying, “I have the authority to determine what must happen to this person because I speak for God.”
That is a profound shift.
Spiritual leadership can become spiritual domination when an authority claims unquestionable access to divine judgment and uses that claim to control another person's life.
Such authority may determine who is guilty, who is innocent, who deserves punishment, who should be rejected, who should be isolated, or whose reputation should be destroyed.
The individual being judged may have no meaningful opportunity to respond.
The institution becomes both prosecutor and judge.
The accusation becomes the evidence.
The leader's interpretation becomes the truth.
And resistance becomes evidence of guilt.
This is an extremely dangerous cycle.
It can produce fear, silence, psychological distress, social isolation, and profound confusion about one's own reality.
This is where spiritual coercion can produce the kinds of psychological injuries examined elsewhere in this work.
Through the SOROMY framework, for example, prolonged spiritual condemnation may contribute to Silent Suffering, as individuals become afraid to speak; Overwhelming Pressure, as they face religious and social demands; Realities of Survival, as they adapt their behavior simply to remain safe; Overlooked Trauma, when the institution focuses on the accusation rather than the person's suffering; Mind–Environment Conflict, when their own understanding clashes with the institutional narrative; and Yearning for Meaning, when the experience causes them to question God, themselves, and the meaning of their spiritual life.
The injury may therefore continue long after the original accusation has disappeared.
7. Final Judgment Belongs to God; Human Responsibility Still Remains
Saying that final judgment belongs to God does not mean that society should tolerate wrongdoing.
Human beings have legitimate responsibilities.
Families must address harmful behavior.
Communities must maintain order.
Courts must examine evidence.
Institutions must establish standards.
Religious communities may correct conduct within legitimate boundaries.
But all of these forms of human accountability should recognize their limitations.
They should not become substitutes for God's ultimate judgment.
A human authority should therefore be able to say:
“This conduct violates our established standard.”
It should be much more cautious about saying:
“God has condemned this person, therefore we have the authority to destroy them.”
The first statement establishes accountability.
The second can become an attempt to occupy God's judgment seat.
The difference is enormous.
The Principle of Spiritual Humility
Perhaps the greatest lesson is therefore not simply that God judges, but that human beings must remain humble because they do not know everything.
Where there is an accusation, investigate.
Where there is disagreement, listen.
Where there is evidence, examine it.
Where there is uncertainty, acknowledge it.
Where correction is necessary, make it proportionate.
Where restoration is possible, pursue it.
Where justice is required, seek legitimate justice.
And where the matter exceeds human knowledge, do not pretend to possess God's knowledge.
Spiritual authority should never become a license to destroy another person.
The fact that someone occupies a religious position does not make that person infallible. The fact that a group speaks in the name of God does not mean every decision it makes is God's decision. And the fact that someone claims to have received spiritual insight does not remove the need for wisdom, evidence, humility, and fairness.
God does not need human beings to impersonate Him.
He requires human beings to walk in truth, justice, mercy, humility, and love.
Final judgment belongs to God.
Human responsibility is to pursue what is right without pretending to possess the perfection that belongs only to Him.
Must learn!!!
[email protected]
September 11: Cedi sells at GHS12.15 on forex market, GHS11.46 on BoG interbank
Asogli State Council clarifies night rituals in Ho, says no restriction on movem...
Bawumia engages young doctors, medical students on healthcare challenges
No shops, no schools: Equatorial Guinea's ghost town new capital
NDC opens nominations for 2026 constituency executive elections on September 15
GRA to audit lawyer's firm after suing AG and GRA over passenger baggage duty ex...
Republic closes case against Adu-Boahene, two others after calling four witnesse...
Police arrest Clemence Gyato over Accra Race Course demolition at Borteyman
Two suspects arrested over alleged plot to murder Susu collector at Botwe
Kidnapped man beg family to pay GH¢50,000 ransom as captors threaten death withi...
