If it is indeed true that the NDC government and the Bank of Ghana mistakenly used an altered or incorrect photograph of the late Madam Theodosia Okoh on Ghana's new GH₵50 banknote, then there are serious questions that demand answers.
1. Was the photograph intended for the new GH₵50 note made public before production? If not, why was there no transparency in the process?
2. Could the authorities not have consulted the family of the late Theodosia Okoh to obtain the correct photograph and formally provided it to the officials responsible for the design and production of the new currency? Was this such a difficult step to take that it had to be overlooked?
3. According to the Bank of Ghana's explanation, three photographs of Madam Theodosia Okoh, representing different stages of her life, were blended and digitally manipulated to produce the final portrait. If this is the case, why was the image altered to such an extent that many Ghanaians can hardly recognise the woman being honoured?
4. Who was responsible for producing and approving the final portrait, and will they be held accountable for the outcome? Technical adjustments required for currency printing should never compromise the fundamental facial identity of the person being honoured.
5. Madam Theodosia Okoh is not the only woman whose portrait appears on the new banknotes. Were multiple photographs of the other women also blended and digitally manipulated?
6. If the same technique was applied to all the personalities, why does Theodosia Okoh's portrait appear so significantly different, while the identities of the others remain recognisable?
7. If the photograph is officially confirmed to be incorrect or improperly represented, will the new GH₵50 banknotes remain in circulation, or will the Bank of Ghana recall them for reprinting? If a reprint becomes necessary, who will bear the cost? This could result in a significant financial loss to the state, and those whose negligence or oversight contributed to this situation must be held accountable. Public funds must not be wasted without consequences.
These are legitimate questions, and the Bank of Ghana owes Ghanaians a clear, transparent and convincing explanation. Our national currency represents our history, identity and heritage. Honouring national icons must be done with dignity, accuracy and respect. Technical incompetence, poor judgement or a lack of due diligence must never be allowed to undermine the legacy of our national heroes.
HEADS MUST ROLL!
#FrakadamAban
#ScandalousAban
By: Peter Thompson
Secretary, NPP Finland Branch.



Two Aduman SHS teachers remanded over alleged sodomy case involving two minors
'What are the technical reasons for the new cedi notes?’ – Oppong Nkrumah questi...
GES forwards 347 salary arrears cases of 2024 teacher recruits for payment
No basis for rent increases in Ghana today – Kwakye Ofosu cites reduced building...
2027 Budget: New Economy is ‘copy and paste’ of 24-hour policy – Amin Adam
2027 Budget: Ato Forson contradicted himself on borrowing – Amin Adam
Microsoft says it is 'deeply sorry' after widespread outages cause global chaos
Microsoft outage causes global chaos
The Nvidia affair: Are markets about to fall out of love with AI?
'Too early to discuss presidential bid’ – Dr. Ato Forson
