
The judiciary is being advised to consider Prof Raymond Atuguba’s research findings as validating the judicial philosophy of Supreme Court Justices instead of an affirmation of judicial bias among the Judges of the apex court.
Law Professor, Stephen Kwaku Asare, says in his view, the controversial findings “simply suggest that Justices have discoverable judicial philosophy and Presidents are good at discerning same and appointing Justices who reflect their preference of philosophy.”
His comments on his Facebook page on Sunday follow attacks by the Judiciary – Chief Justice, Sophia Akuffo and justices of the Supreme Court – on Prof Atuguba’s research that found that the voting pattern by Supreme Court Judges has been consistent with the political leanings of their appointing authority.
Presenting his findings on Thursday at the 2018 GIMPA Law Conference where the Supreme Court judges had gathered, Prof Atuguba explained that he came to this conclusion after analysing one hundred political cases in Ghana.
Justice Jones Dotse has said the research “is an insult of the highest order.”
But Prof Asare opined that “no good President appoints Justices randomly. Their staff reads or should read all opinions, articles and commentaries authored by a potential nominee to evaluate the nominee’s philosophy. To the extent that Presidents are rational, they will then appoint only those whose philosophy is palatable to them.”

- Prof Asare
He explains further: “As an example, in the unlikely event that I am President, I will appoint Professor H Kwasi Prempeh as a Supreme Court Justice. This is not merely because he is my brother but it is because I know and like his judicial philosophy.
"Years after he has been confirmed, a researcher who studies his positions on the bench might find out that he takes my position 95% of the time. Well, this is not because he is biased or consciously rules in my favour. This is merely because his approach to interpreting the Constitution aligns with mine.Rather than play political football with Atuguba’s findings, let us draw the proper policy implications."
Read the full post by Prof Asare below. He appears as ‘Kwaku Azar’ on Facebook.
Story by Ghana | Myjoyonline.com | George Nyavor | [email protected]



Rent Control Commission needs more funding to function effectively – Acting Comm...
September 17: Cedi sells at GHS12.15 on forex market, GHS11.51 on BoG interbank
Mahama, IFC boss discuss Ghana's plans to boost agriculture, infrastructure and ...
'We are not targeting Konkombas over Agbogbloshie 24-Hour Market project' — AMA ...
Abandoning Nkrumah's 7-year development plan for 1D1F, Nkoko Nkitinkiti, Big Pus...
‘Young people will chase politicians away if something drastic is not done’ – Pr...
Govt GH¢1 billion intervention saved diesel from hitting GH¢28 per litre – NPA C...
Bawumia engages traders over high import duties, taxes and demurrage
Both NPP and NDC love galamsey; they have no moral right to accuse each other – ...
Treason allegations against Techiman nurse must be backed by evidence – Barker-V...

Comments
Admittedly l find the research interesting as it provides an opportunity to undertake critical examination of judicial d outcomes within philosophical contexts Unlike the CJ and her colleague justice Dotse, my take is the outcome of Professor Atuguba's research can inform best practice in justice delivery in our country The professional denials and myopic positions will not and cannot enrich academic and professional discussions Meanwhile, what much difference is this research finding from ...