Rawlings And Abacha’s Blood Money – Louis Odion
Like a witch undergoing the last purgation at death’s door, J.J Rawlings’ tongue dramatically came unhinged last week in a fit of abominable rant, thereby diminishing whatever remained of his moral capital as a possible hero of post-colonial Africa. He granted an exclusive interview to The Guardian published last Sunday. But by dabbling in Nigerian affairs in a manner that exposes a shallow understanding of the nation’s history and greed for dollars, the man once fondly called “Junior Jesus” only succeeded in giving himself away as perhaps the ultimate political Judas.
In retrospect, regardless of his canonisation in the 1980s and 90s in some quarters, there remains some murky aspects to Rawlings’ twenty-year reign in Ghana that the tide of history simply cannot sweep out of human memory. True, his political career – first as military lawgiver and later an elected president – was remarkable in populism. But besides that are also the tales of mass murder and impunity. Hundreds of opposition figures, including outspoken journalists and independent-minded Supreme Court judges, were assassinated or simply disappeared. Sadly, their unresolved cases are now, more or less, classified as part of Ghana’s political folklore.
What all of these then fed, in turn, over the years, was Rawlings’ sense of impunity. The underlying narcissist complex was very much on display in The Guardian interview under reference where he tried, though in futility, to rehabilitate the tainted memory of his benefactor and Nigerian dictator, Sani Abacha, whom he presented in flattering terms as “one hell of a nationalist and very patriotic” person who “saved the country”.
When Rawlings chooses to speak so loftily of otherwise discredited Abacha, ascribing to him more or less the toga of a messiah, even after it had become public knowledge that he once received a bribe of $2 million ($5 million?) from the Nigerian despot, the joke is actually on the former Ghanaian president.
At the last count, what Abacha stole and stashed away in foreign vaults was conservatively put at $5 billion. Now, all that the three former heads of state of Ghana were accused of embezzling and for which they were in 1979 summarily “sprayed like mosquitoes”, to borrow Rawlings’ own euphemism, is not up to five percent of Abacha’s loot. The eight top military officers Rawlings had executed in the great purge of 1979, without fair trial, included Rear Admiral Amedume and General Roger Felli, whose only crimes were in leveraging their official statuses to take bank loans!
But the great Rawlings, who often boiled in rage with blood-shot eyes at the mention of corruption while in power, suddenly began to act funny a few years ago when one of his political disciples, Tsikata Tsikata, was jailed by a succeeding administration over impropriety reportedly costing Ghanaian taxpayers a fortune.
In a fit of anger, he sent invitations to journalists to a world press conference to lambast the executive and the judiciary for their temerity. Only for the session to be called off suddenly before the scheduled take-off. The story is told that Rawlings was tipped off that some of the journalists were coming armed with a mischievous question of: whether he ever heard of the old story of eight officers killed in 1979 over alleged corruption.
Of course, in a way, the leak in 1998 of Abacha’s multi-million dollar bribe to Rawlings had confirmed the misuse and abuse of the nation’s resources in the deluded pursuit of influence or favour. By Rawlings’ confession, the donation was unsolicited. All he saw was a car pulling up and someone attempting to drag out a suitcase laden with dollars, right there in the open in Accra. Out of public decency, he reportedly waved the guy to hold it. He saved his next word till they had walked to a discreet corner.
When he finally confronted Abacha’s emissary, who he identified in The Guardian interview as Ismaila Gwarzo (then National Security Adviser) and described as “noble, quiet-looking, respectable-looking”, Rawlings claimed he was told the largesse was from Abacha. (With another NSA currently embroiled in the scandal of sharing $15b arms funds, we now know the seeds of infamy were sown in that office long ago).
Now, just witness the sleazy words addressed to Gwarzo by the sitting president of a whole nation after apparently losing self-inhibition at the sight of mint-fresh dollars, sounding more like the would-be receiver of a stolen valuable weighing the risk: “I hear you people don’t provide assistance without the world hearing it with a twist.” Then, he added: “Don’t think that when you bring this, whatever it is, that would shut me up from criticising if I think you are wrong, or if I disagree”.
To this “conditionality”, Rawlings quoted Gwarzo as retorting: “Sir, we need you more than you need us.”
Well, the visiting NSA could not be more forthright. Abacha’s dollars was to buy the conscience of Rawlings and other African leaders as tyranny deepened in Nigeria. Against that backdrop, it then becomes easier now to situate the conspiracy of silence among the nation’s neighbours in the west coast and indeed across the African continent while sheer terror was being unleashed on the opposition in those dark days. Three kinds of fate awaited dissents then: the grave, the gulag or exile. Ostracised by the civilised countries over the June 12 crisis, the diminutive tyrant holed up in Abuja now sought to, in Wole Soyinka’s words, bring Nigeria down to his level.
Under Abacha, Nigeria resorted to the company of fellow political reprobates. Abuja simply became the preferred destination of other dictators on the continent, as well as political scoundrels and scavengers looking for what to eat under the guise of “solidarity visits”. As the Rawlings’ testimony has revealed, there was an unending flow of suitcases of dollars as honorarium. Only a few like Nelson Mandela refused to be bought to the level of turning a blind eye to the unspeakable evil unfolding in Nigeria then. Initially, Mandela’s attitude to Abuja was that of critical solidarity against western “meddlesomeness”, naively assuming a uniquely African solution could be found.
By the time the playwright Ken Saro-Wiwa, alongside eight others, was hanged after a sham trial on November 10, 1995, the South African hero finally realised he was dealing with a demon. Henceforth, he related to Abacha in that light.
But the spell of dollars and the prospects of more briefcases would seem too overwhelming for the likes of Rawlings then to stand straight and speak in clear and unmistakable terms against the atrocities in Nigeria. And the free dollars from Nigeria would probably have gone unacknowledged publicly had Abacha not ended in the way he did. When Gwarzo was held to account for the billions that had passed through his hands under the guise of “national security”, he listed, among others, that Rawlings, yes the same revolutionarily incorruptible JJ, had quietly benefitted to the tune of $5 million.
Of course, the man so implicated was doubly discomfited. On top of the shame of being exposed would seem deep anger at being swindled. As Rawlings insisted in the interview, the amount counted in the briefcase Gwarzo handed him was actually $2 million, not the $5 million documented in Abuja.
But Rawlings’ thunderous denunciation of corruption today would have made more sense had he taken a step further to furnish us with the details of how the $2 million received was utilised for Ghana’s direct benefit to demonstrate the transparency he is ever quick to evangelise about. For instance, after Abacha’s courier departed, was the entire cash fully or partly declared to Ghana’s exchequer? How was it recorded: “unsolicited foreign aid”? “Stomach infrastructure” from Nigeria or – to ensure some confidentiality – simply a kind neighbourly gesture? These were the simple – yet critical – details the self-assigned anti-corruption warrior of Ghana conveniently chose to deny us.
Perhaps, the dollars Rawlings collected could still have been justified as a fair price for his silence had the verbal diarrhea that permeated the entire interview not also led him into making a more colossal gaffe on MKO. Who, other than a psychopath with warped values, could have spoken so callously of the memory of MKO in the manner Rawlings did? Hear him again: “Some may not want to hear it. But the departure of that gentleman called (MKO) Abiola, the one who passed away, saved Nigeria from a probable explosion.”
There are a few inferences to be made from the foregoing statement. An endorsement of the popularly held – though clinically unproven – notion that Abiola was willfully “murdered” via a cup of poisoned tea with a view to forcing a closure to the June 12 conundrum.
Well, shedding the blood of the innocent may not mean much to a depraved dictator like Rawlings whose hands are still wet till date with the blood of three of his predecessors summarily executed in 1979. But rejoicing at MKO’s “departure”, as the former Ghanaian leader did, is to misread the historic portents of June 12, the cause of which Abiola was unwilling to compromise. It was adjudged the fairest and freest poll in Nigeria’s electoral history at the time.
Besides, in one single day, the nation’s age-old fault-lines of religion and ethnicity were miraculously healed. MKO, a southerner, defeated his challenger, Othman Tofa, in his native Kano in the North. The Muslim-Muslim ticket also broke the sectarian barrier by winning massively in the predominantly Christian South-South and South-East. These historic gains were sadly allowed to waste by the treacherous Ibrahim Babangida and his perfidious apologists. Indeed, those unconscionable acts of yesterday partly explain the monumental mess Nigeria finds herself in today.
By the way, one hopes President Buhari would not succumb to the emotional blackmail in Rawlings’ effusive praise of him in that interview. Perhaps, it is time to renew the bid initiated in 1998. Upon discovery of the nocturnal payment that year, then head of state, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, had politely asked Rawlings for a refund. A request he never dignified with even a reply. Now, with the receiver openly admitting collecting $2 million from Abacha, it would not be out of place to ask EFCC to explore diplomatic means to ensure Rawlings makes a refund in the spirit of the chastity the man himself speaks so passionately about today.
Bouquet for Two Golden Ladies
With the rise of Theresa May on Wednesday as the new British Prime Minister to join Germany’s resilient Angela Merkel and the prospects of Hillary Clinton emerging as Barack Obama’s successor in the United States later in November, the world may indeed be seeing the last days of male chauvinism in global politics. In the times ahead, men will be left with no choice than accept the loss of power to their gender opposite in the new world order.
Back home, a great many of our resourceful ladies are surely making great advances in commerce and public service, far more than the nation seems willing to acknowledge.
Two good examples are Mrs. Catherine Orobosa Agba and Mrs. Yemi Keri (YK) who turned 50 Thursday and Wednesday respectively.
A little start-up Mrs. Agba set up many years ago in the humblest of circumstances has today morphed into Oak Exclusive Designs, a big player in the country’s bourgeoning corporate branding sector. Though she originally obtained a degree in Languages from then Bendel State University (now Ambrose Alli University) in 1987, she proceeded to chart a different course for herself in the business world. Apart from Oak, Mrs. Agba, married to Prince Clem Agba (current Edo Commissioner of Environment), today sits on the boards of many blue chip companies.
Mrs. Keri’s story is no less inspiring. She is presently the Consultant, ICT unit of the National Pensions Commission. But her glory preceded her present station. There is no way the history of the ICT revolution mounted by the Adams Oshiomhole administration in Edo State would be written without Keri occupying a giant space.
With regards to the automation of governance processes in Edo State between 2008 and 2015, credit for the success recorded by the ICT agency belongs substantially to a team of technocrats whose focus and tenacity gave life to the dream of the political authority. YK led this cell of torchbearers as the Managing Director. A first-class professional, her resilience at the hands of jaded bureaucrats allergic to reforms, her can-do spirit over the wiles and treachery of beneficiaries of the old order, helped steer Oshiomhole’s reforms to fruition.
She typifies the Nigerian repatriate who parlays specialised knowledge acquired overseas to add value to his/her fatherland. She obtained her first degree in Accounting in Nigeria before proceeding to the United States to cap it with a Master’s in Information Technology from the prestigious American InterContinental University, Illinois. She received further training in Management at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Thereafter, she worked with SAP, the world’s leading Business Process Solution Provider, as the Regional Director for West Africa. From there, she became Managing Director of FCB, a subsidiary of Centrespread FCB, South Africa’s advertising giant. Before returning to Nigeria to work for her native Edo State.
Here is wishing the two amazons many more years of fulfilment in service to the country and many happy return of the day.
Louis Odion is a Fellow of the Nigerian Guild of Editors.
This piece was written by Louis Odion. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of 360Nobs.com.
Disclaimer: "The views/contents expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of Louis Odion and do not neccessarily reflect those of Modern Ghana.