How to Tackle Questionable Studies?

Whether it is five or twenty-five percent of studies, every sane person understands questionable studies exist and can have devastating effects on millions or billions of lives. At personal levels, we are very weak in tackling a team of liars or illusionists that may headline 'study says', because even our journalists can be very problematic, naive, or even biassed. Beyond personal, few good people in the same or different field may speak-up softly and often very late. Our age demands national and international study verification systems. First, it demands over 75% of studies should be on cameras. If every country tries to verify studies, they may discover something completely different and beneficial. Do not let the excuse mongers cite about five percent of studies to endorse the blind trust we embraced for far too long. An institution dedicated to verification is far above an individual or few people voluntarily speaking-up late. So I must give an example of a questionable study that seems to be widely believed or under-questioned by even their potential victims.

Recently, I noticed countless claims about a questionable study on cannabis and violence, and it was sadly circulated by even pro cannabis activists/pages. So, I did my research. The very sponsor of the so-called study or review was the 'NIH' of UK and their website did not mention they sponsored the study. Science-daily revealed:

'The study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre. '

More worrisome was the headline: 'Cannabis users were twice as likely to commit violence, review finds

Date:
September 30, 2026
Source:
King's College London
Summary:
A review of more than 265,000 people found that cannabis use was associated with higher rates of both committing violence and becoming a victim of it. The researchers say the link is significant but does not prove cannabis itself is the cause."

Please, re-read from the quoted headline: 'Twice' is specific; 'commit' is specific as culprits; more than '265,000' is impressive and specific, because many studies are sadly under hundred people; 'committing violence and becoming a victim of it' is dangerously vague. How hard it is to say: 25% or xyz% of the culprits through cameras were cannabis users, high at the time or not high and craving? 50% or xyz% of the victims were cannabis users and the police or xyz were the verifiable culprits; 25% or xyz% of the victims were cannabis users, but the culprits were drunkards or sober folks who couldn't take jokes like Donald Trump and resorted to violence? By every standard, the United Kingdom and Europe+ are dragging their feet on cannabis legalization, so sponsoring a questionable study is not a far-fetched assumption.

My point is if the United Kingdom had an independent institution for study verification, they could have told us: Kings college of London were always leaning against cannabis by xyz percent based on released studies in the past hundred years, that they were seeking headlines for unknown reasons, students, more funds, etc. The independent institution would have automatically received the working videos or could have demanded it. Beyond the working videos of the college, they can check the 265,000 people through AI or xyz to arguably come to different conclusions. Only cameras can reveal the true initiator of physical violence, because the rest is often claims of potentially biased witnesses, or people trying to save themselves. Rather than wasting millions or billions to fight cannabis, why not invest that money on cameras and urging everyone to invest in body cameras? Build a camera factory and I will volunteer as Manager or worker to help reduce violence... The BBC was sadly describing smart-glasses with cameras as ‘pervert glasses’ to discourage the naive public from embracing the needed strong culture of cameras. Cameras will help billions of Girls, so if it harms thousands or millions of 'guilty' girls, then prosecute or say stupidity is not exclusive to any gender. So we are dealing with a guilty UK with a long history of abuse and under repenting beyond cannabis. Guilty beyond government level.

A strong culture of cameras, including body cameras, will minimise physical violence or at least help us know the real culprits more than a vague study that implicitly claims ‘women will become victims of violence if we legalize cannabis’. I am weaving better than Donald Trump, who despite repeatedly failing cannabis folks, Trump says: ‘At least cannabis folks do not beat up their wives like the alcoholics’. You can endlessly debate that, but I wish the real God would end cannabis criminalization even if it means cursing the top anti-cannabis folks.

Word Choice and Freedom of Speech: If I say: may God proportionately curse those who initiate and/or spread wars, violence, false studies, the anti cannabis legalization folks, etc. Am I being violent or overreacting ? Well, according to the questionable World Health Organization and the guilty College, I may be 'guilty' if the guilty cowards think so or refuse to repent. What is a proportionate curse? If you start a false study, you deserve a big curse; if you spread the false claims without thinking, then you also deserve a small curse until you repent, or there are no more victims through the false study you support. Being cruel is explicitly wrong, but supporting cruel laws is implicitly wrong and deserves some punishment, especially if you feel indifferent. Those who supported slavery laws, segregation, etc may have fractional facts or fears their fellow cowards+ may understand. Our present wrong laws are not much different – the supporters of bad laws in fear, greed, or arrogance are guilty and must be dealt with. If you can call on the unjust police and human judges, then why can't I call on the Just God and righteous angels to help free me and my people by any means necessary. Your proportionate curse may not directly free me, but it may certainly help free me. Curse can mean change of government, because the green party of the UK supports cannabis at least with words, but did they present any legalization bill, or may fool us like Donald Trump? Curses can mean you or your family get sick where cannabis may help, but you may still be ungrateful that a young man or grandpa may be violent to women? So the naive women oppose cannabis legalization? Only guilty politicians, Kamala Harris, or who want to dictate what men+ put in our bodies until when? How many pretty Indians+ women in the UK prefer cannabis over alcohol, or are they afraid to fight the guilty government? Come to the Gambia and party with me...

Quote: “The researchers used the World Health Organization's broad definition of violence, which includes physical, sexual and psychological violence toward another person, both inside and outside intimate relationships.” I wonder if we should call them ‘researchers’, liars, or influencers with a bad or questionable motive? We all agree on the evil of physical violence. However, how do we define ‘sexual violence’? If it is butt spanking, that is indeed physical, and should be treated with the same severity as a punch in the face, except the extreme matriarchal western world may disagree. Remember how Harry Anslinger claims: ‘Cannabis makes our precious white women sleep with black men’? Research on that one beyond the person, but how evil folks repeatedly used women protection to abuse males, especially black males. Ignore the wars to free Arab women, or sexually assault them and hide it as classified information. By implicitly claiming women will become victims of violence if cannabis is legalized, every cowardly woman and women worshipping men will hate legalization. By claiming sexual violence in vague terms, how hard it is for the college or the proposed institution to tell us about five percent was level one to three sexual crimes? That a drunk woman grabbed my cannabis butt, but cannabis must be blamed, not alcohol or women.

Sexual violence is a very broad term, from butt spanking, forced or misunderstood kissing, to rape are all physical before sexual… Hey! Prettiest girl in London or the world, I want to make you scream ‘baby please don't stop’ may be considered sexual violence by some people or countries. Even terrible Saudi-Arabia may be slightly better than the increasingly terrible Western world on even sex, defining sexual crimes, or how to punish or defer sexual and which other crimes. Epstein may convince the world-girls that Saudi-Arabia may kill you for having sex in a Mosque, so come to America, but I swear to treat lovely British or American women better than their average or top men. On a more serious note, I want the proposed verification of this study and every study for more details. Give me enough examples of sexual violence in the study+ that is not physical. Whereas physical rape may be different, I think physical assaults should be ranked with or without different types of weapons. Many countries under punish physical assault with around six months jail, but should we raise it to the same level as sexual assaults of what types is a debate beyond this article.

The study took a period and space of reported violence in the UK. It never studies one million cannabis users of what level versus alcohol users, etc. If the culprits+ used both alcohol and cannabis, the study implicitly linked the violence to cannabis rather than alcohol. The most weird part of the study is not differentiating culprits versus victims in precise numbers. If I was rich or a citizen of UK, I would have sued them. Re-study the people and give more details.

I think I briefly touched on so-called psychological violence. I don't think we should use the term violence for psychological issues. Again, words and actions are very different. Despite my differences with the u.s, I think they are more Islamic than Saudi-Arabia and many so-called Muslim countries on words. If the World Health Organization wants to favor censorship through things like ‘psychological violence’, then I rather side with Trump and dump WHO and United Nations? We all understood WHO hardly did direct research in the past, but can we trust them for the international verification of Studies? Ch.103 is a checklist that is much bigger than the so-called five pillars of Islam. ‘Exhort each other to truth…’ means studies and verifying of studies, and beyond. ‘Learn! In the name of the Lord who teaches man what he never knew [through cannabis, the pen, or any means],' as per ch.96. That same earlier verse includes freedom of speech of over 1500 years ago, but how old is the u.s constitution? The United Kingdom and how many countries are presently jailing people for social media posts? I am not off topic, because individuals who may question their questionable studies or even the proposed verification institution should not be targeted. If Americans and the world starts seeing ch.103 , including freedom of speech, as God given rights and responsibility, then many questionable leaders will be in big trouble, but the world will be a much better place.

Two more Quotes: “Furthermore, cannabis use was significantly associated with an increased risk of becoming a victim of violence (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.38-1.60), a risk more pronounced in females and mixed-gender cohorts compared to males.

Researchers from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) combined data from 63 studies involving more than 265,000 people. They analyzed the general population separately from people receiving psychiatric care.”

To avoid an overly lengthy article, I want to briefly touch on how cannabis criminalisation came about. The culture of questionable studies is very vivid throughout history. As a country, few states reportedly criminalised cannabis before others followed without much studies, then ultimately the federal u.s government. Decades after, the Western world, mainly the u.s, ordered Africa to criminalise cannabis. Virtually, no country in Africa did a single or meaningful research, but blindly followed. Unless we have these national verification of studies, it is indeed possible to corrupt the international verification of studies. There may be studies they will be unwilling to share data on, but that should mean refusal to comply, or hurt our people blindly. In the world of judiciary, I believe governments should focus on only sins between creatures. Show me my victims or stay the hell away from me. Jarga, mind your language or they may claim cannabis is making you violent. OK! Then I will double up: May God curse those who say: ‘no one is above the law”, instead say: the law should not be above anyone but between creatures. Tell them, a man is finally born or reborn. Through the unjust laws, they lawfully victimised Jesus Christ, the blacks, women, etc. I think only the blacks+ who echo ‘no one is above the law’ deserve to be victims of unjust laws until they repent?

Hey! heyy!! Heyyy!!! Imagine if I was the president of the Gambia, Africa, or the world, how many presidents would be shitting their pants in fear? Imagine I or a thousand good cannabis folks were heading the proposed institution for study verification… Those involved in studies in the capitalist world can be motivated by money or simple malice, or simply ignorance. Those sponsoring studies must understand truth matters above the limited interest of any group. So when a study claims: ‘mouth wash kills 99% of bacteria’, how do we know if it includes killing of good bacteria? Jarga, we want you to stay on cannabis examples or the article may become a book, you alienate the lazy Africans who already believed the misleading title of the college above you.

Fair enough. How many studies claimed cannabis makes you fast, so they banned it in Olympics+. Then other studies claim cannabis makes you slow, lazy, etc; then some employers say no hiring of cannabis users, only ketamine using Elon Musk? No! It is possible they are explicitly lying, or simply mistaken. Cannabis comes in strains and the chemical differences per strain must have effects. So if a study in California uses a strain called ‘OG kush’, they may see physical speed improvement in 90% of the people; 70% improvement in mental or emotional state, etc. Then a study in North Carolina may use a strain called ‘white widow’ to see laziness, sleepiness in most participants. Both may not be lying, so let no one think I am against studies. I simply want much better studies and a robust verification system. I am yet to see a cannabis study that mentioned the strain used, as if strains are not significant. Which strains were involved in users as culprits? Perhaps you deny them their favorite strains legally, so the underground world offers the gamble. If over 70% of the strains in the Gambia tends to contribute to lazy feelings, then only legalization and education may reveal such strains are for night time. Will a lazy person commit violence or become a victim of violence? Is fighting back a crime, or Canada and women should be blamed for not fighting back hard enough? If we have the energy boosting strains, then both learning and working standards may improve, especially under camera.

If you trust your life with lying politicians who are in bed with greedy corporations, that is stupidity or personal sin. However, if you insist governments can dictate my personal life, that becomes sins between creatures, and why should I forgive you or the government officials? Not only are we talking about present leaders, but you have no idea how future leaders may be. Humans sadly follow or dangerously follow. Just because governments have been dictating personal lives for centuries now does not mean it is right. Too long, too much, of a wrong thing cannot make a wrong thing a right thing.

In regards to medical Cannabis. Again there are strains and mysteries in cannabis. So the strains that will help a cancer patient sleep well to heal are very different from the strains that will likely hype you up. If you stubbornly oppose harmless cannabis users, God may or may not help you with cannabis. So humble up and stop over controlling people with so-called good intentions like the FGM folks of Africa. Some fear clitoris, cannabis, cameras, etc, but they arrogantly claim we should all fear such. An untreated fear is a disease that may become greed or arrogance. The greedy are saying to satisfy their greed, but the cowards also want their fears imposed on others.

Transitional Compromise: A symbolic punishment of hard drugs may be OK for some countries. Meaning a fine or no more than three months prison time. Arguing things in the name of ‘protecting our children’ through mass cruelty is absurd. You can regulate to protect the children. Don't destroy the lives of teenagers or adults in fear of violence against females or any illusion. Although I will try hard to avoid sicknesses, but the so-called natural hard drugs may be ideal for a ninety year old in pain. They should not have to pay an arm and a leg for cannabis or whatever may work for them. In all honesty, I am not interested in exploring drugs or even alcohol . I want to have fun through exercise, swimming, sunshine, yoga, music, sex, cannabis, etc. When you guys unnecessarily deny the poor access to good fun, then some may try drugs. Feel free to claim some rich people do drugs for various reasons, but the fact remains that poor people tend to use drugs more as a compromise. Cannabis users can safely operate or even create machines that may help the world, so do not use questionable studies to delay legalization.

I am getting tired and it is prayer time. So allow me to go pray to be much better than the average or top Arabs, the whites, the blacks, etc. To be such a great man that God may reward me with a pink, purple, or amazingly beautiful terra-green girl with awesome character. OK Jarga, are you abandoning our earthly girls, then the girls may not vote for legalization. A questionable study or college is already scaring the girls, you want to bring more competitions for the earthly girls? Anyway, I demand all mediahouses to understand the importance of verification and asking tough questions. Let us stop blind trust, because verification is also for spin-off discoveries. May God forgive humans much more, help legalize cannabis worldwide, help realize a strong worldwide culture of cameras, and every good. May God also enrich me to have a nice beachfront mansion or penthouse, plus the best cannabis strains and other blessings. May God bless Showlove Trinity: let's learn, let's work, let's have fun.

By Jarga Kebba Gigo
An Activist and Transformer
Author of Juts Quhr-aahn