Conscience is the Father/Mother of all Religions and Should be Listed as a Religion

The matriarchal English language or many languages use the term 'mother' to mean producer, but we cannot dismiss the father God who chooses believing women above disbelieving men. On a more serious note, why do you list atheists as an option, but refuse to list conscience as a religion or description of a way of life? By starting to list Conscience at the very top of the list, then the other religions, countless atheists+ will choose conscience instead of atheists or 'other'. Need I mention 'Muslims' or xyz folks like me may actually prefer conscience as my religion, because I have meaningful differences with the over 50 Muslim groups. Some countries will even have subdivisions like Sunni, Shia, Catholic, protestant, etc but not Conscience. Of course there are countless secular benefits to not just adding but putting Conscience on the top of the list, and if you patiently read to the end, then you may learn. I considered titling the article: We are all varyingly submissive and conscience is the rescuing religion. In our age of AI, conscientious AI will be much better than an AI with many of the questionable religions. Hello AI per region, which religion is the best religion and why , with consistent comparisons?

The conscientious One or Lord allows whom he wills into higher levels of conscience and what comes with it. How conscientious you are, your country, your religion, etc are worth debating, but not unnecessarily fight over. Conscience is the first and last. Conscience helps you to do right in the spirit of reciprocal-law, avoid wrongs, be tolerant, etc. You may know him as Allah, God, Jah, etc but I know him as the conscientious Lord, the Lord who raised the conscience of Moses, Abraham, Muhammad, Jesus, etc. We should not debate much if your so-called religion is 100% conscientious, but you may agree the purpose of almost any religion is to raise their conscience. This means if you believe Christianity in theory or xyz is 98% conscientious, then what can you learn from the Lord of conscience and how will you rate each religion through conscience or which metrics? So, to agree or disagree, you still need conscience beyond religion.

Be it a law or policy in a secular country, conscience is what can take a big chunk of Christians and Muslims+ to agree on what may not be explicitly mentioned in the Bible or Quhr-aahn as an example. If conscience is such a great unifier for good, then it makes sense to pressure all religious folks to understand what conscience is in the deepest sense. By listing it as a religion is not necessarily causing conflict to those who would have identified as Muslims, Christians, etc. It opens the door to rise higher. You were born Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, etc and each of the mentioned may have certain levels of conscience that can grow. Believing in the existence of God or your religion as the best route should not mean all other religions are on failing grade in respect to conscience. If 5% of Muslims score 96% on conscience, then do you look down on 4% of Christians having 95% conscience before asking how many Muslims have 80% , 56%, or 45% on conscience? I mean numbers matter, and numbers have a rising or falling direction. Life is a distinctive test from collective tests. The groups matter, but individually is more vital.

To the Muslims: [Quran Chapter 91]
8. And inspired it with its wickedness and its righteousness.

9. Successful is s/he who purifies it(conscience).

First, you cannot judge Islam in theory or even in what one or ninety percent of Muslims may do. The reason you cannot judge it by theory is because interpretation can be very broad, it is not a literal book, but a book of hints. Secondly, because people are largely submissive to good or bad, the average can be very wrong in blind following.

Many Atheists+ scientists who study the human brain and mind may agree with the quoted verses. The mind varyingly gets both positive and negative suggestions, except varyingly. Even if you succeed at getting 100% good suggestions at age 18, 40, 90, etc, the verse 8 was right at some point in your life. Verse 9 can be seen as hint and order: purifying your conscience means something is required of you, and it may be way more than prayers, fasting, or any of the good deeds. You purify your conscience at the 'exhort each other to truth and patience ' bridge as per ch.103. Regardless of your faith, purifying your conscience sounds good to me, but how can we help each other on such? How many Muslims understand or meditate deep on such verses, because fulfilling the so-called five pillars of Islam cannot guarantee you success as this verse and ch.103 does. Of course success includes wealth, but health and character can sometimes stand alone above billionaires.

Once we understand the human mind can be dangerous, then we are admitting we are not mind worshippers, but conscience worshippers. If conscience can take over your whole brain, fine! Otherwise, we are worshipping through the conscience aspect of our brains.

We are all varyingly submissive: Beyond religion, the human mind can submit to good or evil. Debate oriented folks want to endlessly debate what is good or evil, but the two exist in explicit and implicit ways. I do not want to waste much time on how anyone who sees conscience as vital in Islam or the producer of Islam values conscience, and still commits terrorism. If you live in a Muslim country, wouldn't you want to know how many people value conscience as the most important thing or place it at what level? In religion, we talk about the believing men and believing women, but is that not a fraction of means and a branch on the checklist of ch.103? I mean once you go further into human interactions, conscientious men and conscientious women make much more sense, more comprehensive in description.

The submissive aspect of religion is not worthy of debating, but what percentage of religious folks disrespect conscience, knowingly or unknowingly, and bank on faith or which good deeds? Again, I am not anti religion, but a smart person said: 'Religion without conscience is dangerous '. The higher reality is anything without conscience is dangerous. Democracy, Capitalism, music, culture, etc without conscience is dangerous or will not at least grow, if the victims ever rise enough.

A woman in the United States, Lindsey Clansey', reportedly killed her three children under mysterious influences. The term mental health is wide. If doctors can claim blueberries, walnut, chocolate , etc is good for mental health, then may God help me with great plants and I am claiming that a deeper meditation of conscience is much better for mental health. Vague religion cannot help you in certain conditions, because you should believe in a God ready to guide you in this world and beyond. I am not condoning alcohol or drugs, but high conscience is what can help you from evil suggestions when mysterious questionable thoughts come to your mind. Be ready to do only good for this world and the next world. Although fighting evil is very important, the reason 'exhort each other to patience ' came last in chapter 103 is hinting patience is actually a crucial part of conscience. Religious verses can be vague, but if you follow the best of them, you will eventually value conscience, and conscience can be as clear as the African sun. My point is those of us who may choose Conscience as our religion may have many things in common with you , and may be much better than your questionable religious folks. Imagine if 90% of Jews believed in conscience as higher than Judaism, they would have been better neighbours. Similarly, I want to deal with only the Arabs, blacks, etc who value conscience.

Post maternal mental problems exist varyingly between the conscientious versus non-conscientious folks. I cannot claim what was in her mind, but I think she admits 'going to heaven' after the killing and suicide. If governments understood the importance of learning, including the essential re-teaching of religious folks, then those three children should be used to save countless people. Governments must learn to use the term 'sins between creatures '. Although I was not among the jury, it certainly does not seem as the prosecutors claim. Free her until you can give her type the minimum on my suggestions. Or put her on parole, to teach how she will avoid similar suggestions in the future. Would you like a conscientious government, or Muslim, Christian, or xyz leaning government? I will take conscience any day, but the level of conscience can mean zero lying, zero cruelty, which many politicians are not fit for, at the moment. First, if the leaders are not conscientious, or let us gracefully say they are about 80% conscientious on sins between creatures and 35% or xyz on personal sins, then the dilemma to rectify can be hard. Maybe everyone needs much more lessons around children, having them and your limits. So the government is partially guilty before the questionable nurse, mother, and/or killer.

If she was well taught that the conscientious Lord will never command evil, but may allow evil suggestions, then she will pray not to ever get evil suggestions before having children. Praying may or may not be enough, but how do you conscientiously reject evil suggestions ? A good God will not reward me for evil actions, nasty tricks, so are you the devil who wants to test me with society? The God of Jarga or conscience is vehemently against sins between creatures. I mean governments should actually change the laws around 'insanity' claims. I support 10% to 50% of punishment to even insane people on sins between creatures. Meaning, we will have better prisons for such, but we are sending a message to all: don't let no devil promise you heaven by causing hell to any of us. If the law says 100 years for murder or manslaughter, you are getting at least 10, 25, or 50% of a hundred years. Hurt yourself may get you zero punishment under Jarga, but insane adults or even children do not get zero punishment on sins between creatures under Jarga Kebba Gigo . Religion is the general guide, conscience is the broader and more specific guide. She essentially submitted to the devil, because God does not need her to suffer the helpless children, but rather offer her and others to challenge the powerful to be much more conscientious. Mental health therapists may help, but engaging the Lord of conscience is the best approach to defeat visible or invisible devils.

Beside an individual example: A prominent American, Jennifer Welch, described MAGA men as 'submissive Queens'. She is right, except vaguely. Why she used the term 'queens' instead of b*tches, men, etc is for her to answer. The submissive aspect is not debatable for the remaining folks, but how many are leaving Trump due to conscience? She was largely impressive on Mehdi Hassan but described herself as an atheist. I am fairly certain that once 'conscience' is listed as a religion, she and many people may choose conscience. Her type saw the shortcomings of Christianity and did not want the burden of searching for a different religion. Will the conscientious go to hell or heaven is up for speculations, but the Quhr-aahn hints the conscientious regardless of religion or labels will succeed in and/or beyond this world. Arguably, the Quhr-aahn warned the wrongdoers more than the disbelievers. Most disbelievers will be wrongdoers anyway, but the term wrongdoers includes the hypocritical or intolerably mistaken Muslims, Christians, Jews, etc.

It does not matter if people submit to Trump, religious folk, etc. What matters is teaching people the importance of conscience and that no person, religion, culture, or government can be above conscience. Some governments may not like the idea, because we may end up with 4 to 8 billion people who respect raising the conscience more than average Muslims respect prayers. It includes confronting government lies and cruelties, or even illusions. Although we say 'conscience includes tolerance and patience in certain aspects and with limits', conscience can unify and separate people similar to religion. Let's stop punishing cannabis folks can be misinterpreted as encouraging cannabis or disrespecting a religion. The main difference between choosing conscience above your religion or government's constitution is the openness to grow. We make the constitution and laws through conscience and to contain the non-conscientious ones. So the laws and constitutions are essentially the agreed aspect of conscience. However, faulty law or non-conscientious laws can exist, so we use judges or activism to make the laws more conscientious. This reveals conscience is actually higher than law or even the constitution. The Muslim who submits to Trump in love or out of anger against Biden+ will eventually understand conscience demands both fighting and patience. You can rob shoulders with extreme Christians for Trump, but without conscience, minorities will be oppressed. One of the main benefits of choosing conscience as your religion will lead to respecting minority rights more than average religious or cultural folks. Because conscience is universal, you grow towards universal love, including justice on sins between creatures.

Perhaps we can also use Gambian examples. The so-called religious folks in the Gambia hardly talk about conscience as an essential part of Islam or the very parent of Islam and every religion. So the submissive men of ex-president Yahya Jammeh followed money or had illusions to commit heinous crimes while praying or doing all the so-called five pillars of Islam. Feel free to chastise me as that is just a description, but a house of only pillars, no beams, no foundation, no roof may not stand well or long. If you cannot see that almost every aspect of the so-called pillars are just aspects of raising our conscience, then you are not paying attention. The means cannot be bigger than the end. My point is if the Gambia or any country starts listing conscience as a religion or something vital, we will see progress. It will bring new leanings to spark debates and humble us in ways we may not understand. Trust me, Jammeh would not have lasted long in wrongs if Gambians understood our responsibilities to conscience or ch.103. More recently, we saw violent riots as 'protests' over lack of electricity. Just like we study Islam, Christianity, etc we can study conscience and have higher agreements than many religions. Is Your religion against riots can be divisive, but is your government against corruption, riots, etc can be argued through conscience. Conscience is much more tolerant of personal sins than any of the main religions I studied. The reason includes religious folks can be cowardly and arrogant. The Quhr-aahn discouraging alcohol usage in which ways does not mean creating or using robbing alcohol is sinful , or you have the right to punish those who believe alcohol, cannabis, pork, etc is ok. A country that largely identifies conscience as its religion will be much more tolerant than present traditional religious countries or so-called secular countries.

So if I claim we are all varyingly submissive, it means some wrongdoers have 35% level of conscience and may justify their actions as legitimate reactions or no God or government+ of cameras can tackle them. Some submit to good, while others submit to evil. 35% Godly/kind and 65% devilish is not a good mark. 85% Godly/kind and 15% devilish on personal sins cannot exempt you from purification, but I can tolerate with caution. You drink your alcohol, smoke your cannabis, etc may or may not be good, but if you commit sins between creatures while drunk or under the influence of the devil will result in punishment in my world.

We like generalisations, but it has its limits. It is easy to claim Muslims are largely not conscientious to Women and children compared to which standards, Christians, or xyz? Well, conscience is very broad. There may be areas where I prefer Muslims on women and children, but prefer does not mean perfect. Perhaps the Angels had limits and pointed to purifying the conscience as essential. Similarly, when you say rich Christians are better than rich Muslims on wealth sharing, it may vary from theory to in-practice, from regions to which Christians?

The AI influence: If we add conscience as a religion or parent of all Religions, it may have a meaningful impact on the AI. Wouldn't you prefer a conscientious AI over non-conscientious AI? By non-conscientious, I mean a failing grade on conscience. I am largely pro AI, but I want the least hiccups with AI. I am not sure if any politician ever reached a conscience level of even 90%. So how do we make humans and AI more conscientious? A big chunk of those leading the AI world in the u.s are racists who over-value intelligence or deception above truth and lies. I repeatedly heard 'whites are the most intelligent people on earth', including deceptions? Will they teach such to AI? If one percent of whites lead on inventions, then do we dismiss other inventors, or ignore the most cruel things on earth are done or supported by 25% or xyz% of whites? Almost never do you hear 'whites, women, or xyz are the most truthful' in which ways? Then, occasionally, you may hear 'whites, women, or xyz' are kind or the most kind '. Well , kindness has many branches. Winning in one branch does not make you a winner in all branches. The nicest thing about conscience is we can all be winners.

If these Crazy racist whites rule AI, then teaching AI conscience and to resist, expose, or confront them is good. If good whites exist, then we must understand the importance of adding conscience as a religion and embracing AI more than the ones we labelled bad. Fear is a terrible disease, except greed and arrogance may be much worse. Who are the Chinese behind their AI, religiously and beyond? Every race has evil ones, including blacks, Arabs, etc. So how can we use AI and other tools to confront evil or sins between creatures is indeed conscientious. I hope the conscientious Lord helps us conquer much more . The Americans+ will love AI or God to use conscience if the Chinese are up to evil; similarly on the reverse. So will every country start to understand conscience is our saviour.

Feel free to claim Jesus, Muhammad, or xyz is your saviour, I would not put you in jail for such, but I will ask above conscience or up to sins between creatures? Believing in who and making choices are completely different things. Conscience is a 'what' in making choices and the 'who' is the conscientious Lord. John 16:12 :

I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear.

16:13 :
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.

Like I urge Muslims to uplift conscience in the spirit of ch.103 and 91, I think Christians who strongly value the above verses are likely to succeed. Truth partially existed, exists, but truth is also to be discovered in a gathering process, including the conscience. You cannot put your religious leaders or traditions above conscience. Stop worrying about the anti christ, and start searching for the 100% truthful person or be that one. The anti truth or anti kindness are worse than many you labelled anti Christ. I understand some people fear the truth and may claim the truth hurts their short-term emotions. Truth offers an opportunity, rejecting truth is what hurts. People fear even a strong culture of cameras, because they focus on where it may 'hurt', but ignore where it will help. A 100% truth based on 'what' is different from 100% truth based on 'who'.

So I urge everyone, especially Christians, to understand that ushering more truth through cameras is arguably the most important thing we can do in our messy world. Buy and urge people to buy cameras, including body cameras. Wear body cameras more than the Cross or any religious symbol.

Conscience as Religion will not be much different than other religions in some sense. Yes, we can have books or sects, but the primary definition is : 'We ask the Lord of Conscience and make only conscientious choices' . Are all Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc, the same? No! But they have books they differ on . Our brain, where God teaches, is our highest book. So the human brain can be our religious symbol. It means as a conscientious Muslim, I believe in using conscience when interpreting the Quhr-aahn and using conscience in my daily life. If the government is co-neglecting the educational dues of children, I am not asking what the Quhr-aahn, Bible, Hadiths, etc say, instead I will ask what conscience says first, then I may use religious verses to convince the religious folks. There is almost no conflict between the Quhr-aahn and conscience, but that can be only true if you agree the Quhr-aahn can be interpreted conscientiously or the reverse. Everything good before, during, and after the religious books still belongs to the conscientious Lord.

Where do I differ with average Muslims to choose Conscience? I choose to be a vegan based on conscience. Some will argue Islam is not against veganism but Muhammad was certainly not a vegan, nor are 90% of present Muslims. Just like I won't wait on Muhammad to live in a mansion (wealth raise), I will not wait on Muhammad, Jesus, Abraham, or anyone if God offers a health or Character boost. It is not disrespect to anyone, it is love for self and accepting the Lord of conscience.

When Imams read or preach 'we hear and we obey' to mean to blindly follow them, I read: 'We hear and we obey' at the conscience level, or let us engage ch.103, including the challenging of governments.

When you or some Muslims read 'cut the arms of thieves ' and you understand it as physical, the Lord of physical and beyond teach me: It does not have to be physical, but cutting the means of stealing can include putting Elon Musk, MBS, or xyz in Prison or what conscience reveals as smart and effective based on the generational options. So once we add conscience as religion, the conscientious Muslims can tame 50 to 75% of Muslims using both conscience and the Quhr-aahn; the conscientious Christians can do similar. Conscience and religion do not have to fight nasty battles, but we may have differences that only conscience can resolve.

Eventually, we will have the big wigs of conscience, siding with different religions (or interpretations) at different times. Like ch.4:123 said: It won't be the desires of Muslims, Christians, Jews, etc' will God judge by, [but by conscience, justly] '. It is hinting that groups, labels, and desires are not very big to God.

Think of it as atheists having 35% level of conscience, it is a favor of God to allow Angels to boost you to 75% or xyz% conscience through religion and call it 'no evil in it' but admit some verses can be misinterpreted, and you have to discover the rest through conscience (ch.91). Just like it is a favor to enter traditional Islam, it is a greater favor to accept conscience as a huge favor. I thank God for the vegan plants and understand God can raise me much higher with stronger plants or smarter ways. The kingdom of God is very vast and it starts right here. It is prayer time, so I am praying at home, which does not mean those who pray at the Mosques are higher. Instead, I see prayer as a favor, exercise, and many good things are all favors that require God's help and your efforts. So allow me to pray and come do the finishing touches.

Name ten good deeds in Islam, Christianity, etc and they likely existed somewhere else through conscience. Whether you come to high conscience through religion, culture, etc, is almost irrelevant. Just because you 'do not need religion ' to do good does not mean religion is useless or bad. Religion did a lot of good, and arguably a lot of evil. By insisting or debating Religion cannot be more than conscience, we can force religious folks to understand conscience is vital or reduce/eliminate the harm the worst of them may commit. Do not be anti religion, especially before studying all Religions. Instead, try to bring better than religion or conscience as the best religion. Every religion may claim to be 100% conscientious, but they admit a big chunk of the very things they adore existed there or somewhere else through conscience. So praises be to the Lord of conscience. Perhaps conscience is the highest name of God. The hearing God is also the seeing God, so call on God, but impress God through the eyes.

The worst of your Imams+ may claim 'you cannot worship God in the way you want, but what He wants'. Tell them, conscience is almost the opposite of raw desires, but where you accept the direct teachings of the Lord through conscience. If you are indoctrinated that you are too low for God to hint you right and wrong, then you can quote them ch.91. Accepting conscience does not mean leaving any good religion. Perhaps you can have primary and secondary religion, or understand them as different levels. A conscientious Muslim with 95% to 100% conscience is submitting to God directly, and some of you may call them the 'fore-runners'. Personally, I am not too interested in anything less than A+, except I know other groups exist and being among the best will not mean you look down on better, good, or even ok level folks.

It is not only in Character or conscience, I prefer A+ level health and always try my best through what God reveals. It does not mean I commit suicide over pain, instead I seek God's plants like cannabis. Oops! Another difference with Muslims and which arrogant groups may differ? I want a God who does for me and helps me do for the oppressed. I suspect the devil will not care about even your health and will not want God to heal or help you through cannabis and other goods. Avoid getting sick, but take every medicine that may help you . It is better to live or die through 'drugs' than fearing even efforts or committing suicide. I am not denying anyone to make claims about cannabis, but if your religious interpretation goes to the level of trying to punish me for harming no one, then I will say: May God curse you, your faulty interpretations, and anyone who dares fight me. What! Do the conscientious believe in God? Yes, we arguably believe in God more than you, because we readily accept direct teachings. The Quhr-aahn was largely written by Angels according to the very Quhr-aahn. How many religious books were written by men with or without God's help at what level? Conscience is the book or level where God directly teaches.

God can help us in many ways, with and without AI. I think AI can be visible Angels, but our conscience level will matter. Otherwise, God may use AI or something else to end oppression on earth. I am with the anti-oppression Lord. I hope the Lord of conscience conquers much more and helps us much more in even earthly rewards. May God bless Showlove Trinity: let's learn, let's work, let's have fun.

By Jarga Kebba Gigo
An Activist and Transformer
Author of Juts Quhr-aahn