Julius Malema Questions Ghana’s Diplomatic Approach After Repatriation of 300 Citizens From South Africa

Julius Malema, President of the opposition EFF party

Julius Malema has reportedly criticised Ghana’s handling of the recent evacuation of nearly 300 Ghanaian nationals from South Africa amid renewed anti-immigrant tensions and xenophobic threats.

According to remarks circulating in South African media discussions, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader argued that Ghana’s response did not sufficiently prioritise dialogue and diplomatic engagement with South African authorities before proceeding with the evacuation exercise.

The comments come after the Government of Ghana approved the repatriation of hundreds of its citizens from South Africa following growing fears over attacks and intimidation targeting foreign nationals.

President John Dramani Mahama authorised the emergency evacuation earlier this month after Ghanaian authorities received reports of increasing hostility against African migrants in parts of South Africa.

The first batch of evacuees arrived at the Kotoka International Airport in Accra on May 27, where they were received by government officials, including Foreign Affairs Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa and Chief of Staff Julius Debrah.

Many of the returnees described fear, uncertainty, and insecurity following recent anti-foreigner protests in South Africa. Reuters reported that South African officials and Ghanaian authorities had been coordinating the voluntary repatriation process after hundreds of Ghanaians expressed interest in leaving the country.

Malema, who has previously condemned anti-African sentiments in South Africa, also recently described the growing hostility toward African migrants as “Afrophobia” rather than xenophobia. He argued that colonial divisions continue to fuel distrust among Africans across the continent.

The issue has generated mixed reactions across Ghana and South Africa. Some observers praised the Ghanaian government for acting quickly to protect its citizens, while others argued that many migrants remain economically dependent on opportunities in South Africa and are reluctant to abandon their businesses and livelihoods.

South African immigration officials disclosed that only a small number of the evacuated Ghanaians reportedly possessed valid immigration documentation at the time of departure, an issue that has further intensified debate over migration, border enforcement, and regional diplomacy.

Despite the tensions, both Ghanaian and South African officials have publicly maintained their commitment to preserving diplomatic relations and protecting the rights of African migrants through lawful and constitutional means.