Misquoting Mr. Kennedy Agyapong’s Anger: A Case of Passion And Patriotism

Why should Ken not be angry when the country stands benefit just few in politics and their families at the expense of the whole citizens? Why should Ken not get angry when Dumsor cannot be solved by great leaders holding PhDs? Why Ken should keep quiet when an economic messiah sells Ghana’s economy to IMF? You better take your time to study great leaders who share true nationalism. Kennedy Agyapong’s outspoken nature is often misinterpreted as arrogance of his money or insolence, but his reasoning stems from deep concern for Ghana’s development, youth unemployment and frustration with governance failures on corruption and economy. His outspokenness is driven by patriotism, resistance to corruption, and empathy for everyday Ghanaians.

Agyapong is never pleased when citizens suffer due to leadership mismanagement. Despite being a member of the ruling party, he has openly criticized policies and decisions he believes hinder national progress, making him one of Ghana’s most independent political voices. Initially, I struggled to understand why he would criticize his own party, but after studying his speeches and actions, I realized this reflects his commitment to truth over political loyalty.

For instance, he supported the Free Senior High School program—demonstrating that he backs policies beneficial to the general public. However, he has strongly opposed instances where government decisions favor a few individuals at the expense of the nation.

Key Issues He Has Challenged:

🔹 Opposition to Excessive Government Size – He did not support Nana Akufo-Addo’s appointment of 110 ministers, believing it was wasteful.

🔹 Discontent with Economic Leadership – He criticized Dr. Bawumia’s handling of the economy, citing Ghana’s IMF dependency as a failure.

🔹 Concern Over Reckless Borrowing – He opposed excessive loans taken by then Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta, warning of long-term financial instability.

🔹 Anti-Corruption Stance – He has consistently spoken against corruption, demanding greater accountability from both his party and opposition leaders.

Kennedy Agyapong’s boldness and independent thinking set him apart. While some misinterpret his frustration, a deeper analysis reveals a politician who prioritizes national interests over political alliances.

1. Strong love for Ghana – His patriotism drives his firm stance on national issues.
2. Prioritizing Ghana’s development – Advocates for policies that put Ghana’s growth first.
3. Concern over graduate unemployment – Frustrated by job shortages compared to other nations.
4. Discontent with corruption – Condemns dishonest practices that stall national progress.
5. Anger over politicians' selfish interests – Criticizes leadership focused on personal gain over national welfare.
6. Frustration with lawlessness – Calls for stricter adherence to governance and legal order.
7. Security being compromised – Alarmed by political interference in law enforcement.
8. Unfulfilled campaign promises – Highlights inconsistencies between political pledges and reality.
9. Trader struggles from poor economic policies – Recognizes challenges in high interest rates and market instability.
10. High import duties at Tema Harbor – Advocates for fair taxation to support businesses.
11. Teachers and nurses struggling financially – Criticizes poor compensation that leaves essential workers unable to afford vehicles.
12. Deteriorating road networks – Calls for improved infrastructure to boost economic activities.
13. Electricity issues (Dumsor) – Displeased with the persistent power crisis affecting businesses and households.
14. Push for accountability – Advocates transparency in governance and responsible leadership.
15. Vision for Ghana’s future – Urges leadership to create lasting solutions rather than temporary fixes.

Mr. Agyapong’s concerns reflect common frustrations among many Ghanaians, emphasizing the need for efficient governance and national transformation. Ghana needs industrialized economy not defamation of great leaders.

Critics should avoid slandering, libeling and smearing. This bucolic foreign culture of a deliberate attempt to tarnish someone’s image should be avoided.

By
Gaddiel R. Ackah
[email protected]

U.S. Navy veteran. Lives in U.S.A.
Social Advocate for economic independence, spiritual growth and ethical leadership. His work spans education, business, spirituality, leadership and creative arts, making him a multifaceted influencer.

Author of Many Leadership and Inspiring books.

• Competent Leadership:
• Becoming Successful
• Our Happiness.
• Some Choices Matter
• Respect Matters
• Faith Wipes Tears
• The Power of Faith