Ghana’s economic stability yet to reflect in citizens’ lived experience — APL Wellbeing Tracker
A new survey by policy think tank, the African Policy Lens (APL), has revealed that recent macroeconomic gains are yet to significantly improve the daily lives of Ghanaians.
The report, dubbed the Ghana Wellbeing Tracker, shows that while inflation has dropped sharply and key economic indicators have stabilised, households continue to face pressure from the high cost of living.
The survey, conducted across all 16 regions using 3,698 respondents drawn from the 2024 voter database, highlights a disconnect between national economic performance and household realities.
Speaking at the launch in Accra on Wednesday, the APL’s Director of Research and Administration, Dr. Hayford Mensah Ayerakwa, said the study was designed to capture how ordinary Ghanaians experience the economy beyond official data.
“We have seen some very good progress at the national level, at the macro level, but the lived experience of the average Ghanaian is still not very solid,” he said.
According to the report, the Ghana Wellbeing Index stands at 58.5, indicating a stabilising but still fragile economic condition for households.
The cost of living remains the biggest challenge, with a score of 44.7, reflecting high pressure on households, particularly in areas such as food, transport, and utilities.
Employment and income security recorded a moderate score of about 59, suggesting some stability, but with stagnant income growth and weak recovery in earnings.
“It is not the case that jobs do not exist. Jobs exist, but incomes are not sufficient or stable enough,” Dr. Ayerakwa explained.
The report also found that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are surviving but struggling to expand due to high production costs and weak demand, limiting job creation.
On financial resilience, households showed relative strength with a score of 78.9, indicating optimism about the future despite ongoing economic pressure.
The survey further revealed disparities across regions, with some areas performing better than others, while women and rural dwellers were found to be worse off compared to men and urban residents.