The Unity Test: The NPP's Road To 2028

Saturday, October 3, 2026 marked a new phase in the New Patriotic Party's (NPP) reorganisation agenda after its defeat in the 2024 elections.

Before the conference, the party had gone through a series of other phases, including a constitutional reform in 2025. Earlier elections had already taken place — the flagbearer and regional elections.
Previous internal contests saw the national elections taking stage before the contest for a flagbearer.

The notion behind the change was to strengthen the party's structures, a first step in its reorganising agenda. It is a feat that its former National Organiser and now Second Vice Chairman, Henry Nana Boakye, described as massive, saying the spirit of the NPP is back.

"Imagine if we had not organised our Presidential primaries first, meaning all the flagbearer aspirants would have formed their polling stations, we would have created 40,000 problems because we have over 40,000 polling stations," he said on Wontumi tv while on the campaign trail before the conference.

Eleven people were elected on Saturday, most of them new faces. The returning faces from the last administration include the General Secretary, Justin Kodua Frimpong, who retained his position, and Henry Nana Boakye, who was elected Second Vice Chairman.

A new name in this administration, but not to the party's national executive, is John Boadu, an experienced party officer who has served in major portfolios. He is a former General Secretary and now National Chairman.

Another change worth mentioning is Kojo Fosu, who won First Vice Chairman. Mr Fosu pulled an upset after defeating heavyweights like Nana Akomeah, Henry Nana Boakye and Dr Mustapha Hamid.

The elections have ended, but the rebuilding agenda is now more critical than ever. The party may have successfully elected its national officers but the challenge to turn the tide by building a formidable system capable of winning an election is yet to take shape.

This analysis examines whether the language of unity, listening and consultation can survive the structural tensions the new constitution has created and the pressures the 2028 campaign will bring.

On the frontline, the NPP's task has been cut out for it. It is a task the newly elected executives know and have already talked about.

John Boadu, the National Chairman, said in his acceptance speech after he was declared as the winner: "We are going to build a renewed NPP that listens more, consults more, organizes better and prepares deliberately for the future."

This message, when scrutinised, is a summed-up analysis of the problems that led to the party's defeat in 2024. John Boadu talked about a listening party. It is the same message in the welcome address of the Ashanti Regional Chairman, Odeneho Kwaku Appiah (COKA), at the conference.

COKA said: "The 2024 elections taught us important lessons: that as leaders of our great party, we must always listen to our members," he said while welcoming delegates to the Ashanti region on Saturday.

If the party is to grow, consultation must reign. At the conference, everybody talked about unity. Unity has become more of a chant. The flagbearer, Dr Bawumia; the Minority Leader, Hon. Afenyo-Markin; the Ashanti Regional Chairman, COKA; and former President Nana Akufo-Addo all talked about unity.

This reinforces John Boadu's own emphasis on listening and consultation. But the task is harder than it looks.

Who Actually Leads?
The party added fourteen amendments to its constitution, including increasing representation of Council of Elders on the steering committee, additional constituency and regional vice chairpersons, a deputy regional and constituency communication officer, three additional national vice chairpersons taking the tally to six (three appointed, three elected).

Key among them was the decision to make the party's flagbearer the leader of the party. This makes Dr Bawumia the leader of the party, leading the charge of steering the party to victory in 2028.

But the National Chairman and the other national executives remain responsible for the administration and organisational machinery of the party, creating a structure in which political leadership now sits with the flagbearer while the elected executives remain central to the party's institutional operations.

There is a broader challenge here. Every human institution that puts together a vision is left with a gap to close, the gap between vision as rhetoric and vision institutionalised. Thus, if the NPP is to move from rhetoric to institutionalisation, the deeper problems must be assessed. The questions are plain.

Dr Bawumia, who is now the party's leader, has become a centre of authority, but where does that leave the National Executive?

They will be in charge of the party's operations; in short, the engine behind its machinery.

The approved amendments give room for consultations.
The presidential candidate is to develop the campaign structure in consultation with the National Executive Committee, while appointments to the campaign advisory structure require National Council approval.
Professor Mike Oquaye has also said the National Council, Council of Elders and National Executive Committee will provide checks on the party leader.
But what happens when policy and administration collide?

Where Does Unity Leave The Grassroots?

COKA's assertion that the leadership did not listen to grassroots concerns before the 2024 elections is evidence of neglect of the grassroots in the party.

Some of the questions on the table for the national hierarchy to answer are these:
Are different factions being included?
Are constituency concerns being heard?
Are former rivals being brought into the campaign?
Are influential members being marginalised?
Are national decisions being communicated properly?
When these questions are not answered properly, the unity message will move from solution to distortion.

The 2028 campaign: where unity will be tested
That distortion is most likely to begin with the 2028 campaign strategy.

A campaign strategy is where the language of unity becomes decisions: who sits on the campaign team, who controls the money and logistics, which constituencies get attention first, and who speaks for the party. Members will read each of those decisions as a signal of who is inside the tent and who is outside it.

This will be a hurdle, the flagbearer will have to overcome since the constitutional amendment has put him in charge of leading the campaign.

There is the risk of selective inclusion. If former rivals in the flagbearer race are praised outside but left out of important campaign decisions, or if the campaign team is filled mainly with the flagbearer's loyalists, the unity message will read as a slogan rather than a shared commitment.

In such situations, members who feel sidelined often do not protest openly. They work less, give less and bring out fewer voters.

The next risk is a mismatched message. A campaign that promises of a party that listens, but communicates decisions to members only after they are made, contradicts itself. Competing voices from the flagbearer's camp, party headquarters and constituency offices will provide the ruling party with an ace card and leave voters thinking the NPP has not settled its own questions.

There is also the matter of accountability for 2024. A strategy that does not state plainly what went wrong, and what will be done differently, asks members to unite behind a plan they have not been shown.

On Keeping Ambitions In Line
These pressures will be hardest to manage where ambition is involved, because the campaign will decide whose constituencies receive attention first.

The party's ability to keep members with ambition in check is also paramount, especially among aspirants who want to contest parliamentary seats.

At this critical moment in opposition, Parliament remains one of the most useful tools the NPP has to criticise the government constructively. With its low numbers, there can be no distractions, and keeping ambitious members in line will be key.

The strategy for avoiding ruffled feathers will be crucial. The challenge of maintaining discipline without hurting emotions is a balance worth keeping track of.

The Way Forward
The NPP has finished choosing its leaders. Whether it can win with them is the question that remains. Saturday's conference answered who will run the party. It did not answer how.

The words the leadership chose, listening, consultation and unity, are the right ones. But words only count when they are tested. Each time the flagbearer and the National Executive disagree, each time a constituency complains and is heard, each time a former rival is brought back into the fold, the party will either prove those words as true or just words to appease the masses.

The party's own history makes the point. Many of the leaders who stood on that stage on Saturday were part of the system that lost in 2024. COKA's admission that leaders failed to listen is therefore not just a lesson but a standard. The NPP must be measured against it, and the grassroots will be the ones to measure.

Reorganisation is slow, unglamorous work: clear lines between the flagbearer and the executives, a campaign strategy that brings rivals and the grassroots in rather than handing down instructions, a Parliament caucus that stays disciplined, and a membership that feels seen.

If the NPP does that work, 2028 will not be a distant dream, the unity message will not be chants, or rhetorics but one that will mend the its broken structures.

   Comments0