When Tradition Meets Islam: Who Should Inherit When a Muslim Dies in Ghana?

Death is painful enough without turning it into a battle over property. For a woman who has spent perhaps 20, 30 or even 40 years building a home with her husband, raising children, supporting the family and standing by him through good and difficult times, the death of that husband should not become the beginning of another struggle --- this time with his family.

Yet this is precisely where questions surrounding inheritance, customary law and Islamic law can become difficult in many parts of northern Ghana and elsewhere. The question is not whether culture should be respected. It should. The question is also not whether Islamic inheritance principles should be respected by Muslims. They should. The more difficult question is this: when a man and woman are Muslims, but their marriage and family life are also deeply rooted in customary traditions, what rules should govern the distribution of the man's estate when he dies?

And perhaps the even more important question is this: Should couples not be encouraged, while they are alive and of sound mind, to make their wishes concerning their property and succession as clear as the law permits? This is not an argument against tradition. Neither is it an argument against Islam. It is an argument for clarity, fairness and compassion.

Inheritance in Islam: A Right, Not a Family Favour

Islamic inheritance is not simply a matter of calling a family meeting after a person's death and asking relatives who deserves what. The Qur'an establishes specific rights for qualifying heirs. Surah Al-Nisa, particularly verses 11, 12 and 176, provides the foundations of Islamic inheritance. For example, a surviving wife is entitled to one-quarter of her deceased husband's estate where he leaves no child, and one-eighth where he leaves children, subject to the rules concerning debts and bequests. A husband, similarly, is entitled to one-half of his deceased wife's estate where she leaves no child and one-quarter where she leaves children.

These are not gifts from the husband's family to the widow. They are rights recognized by Islamic law. This is why fara'id, the Islamic science of inheritance, is so important. The distribution of an estate is not supposed to depend on who is the loudest person at the family meeting, who is the family head, who was closest to the deceased or who thinks the widow is "deserving."

The precise calculation can become complicated depending on the surviving heirs. That is why Islamic inheritance should be calculated by people properly trained in fara'id, rather than improvised at a family gathering. There is another important point. Islamic inheritance does not mean that the widow receives everything. It also does not mean that the husband's brothers automatically inherit everything. And it does not mean that sons can decide what their sisters should receive. There are prescribed rules. And those rules exist precisely because death can create competing interests.

What Customary Law Was Designed to Protect

Customary inheritance has a different historical foundation. In many African societies, the individual was understood as part of a larger kinship system. Property was not always regarded simply as the private possession of an individual. Certain property belonged to lineages, families or other corporate groups. This helps us understand the traditional role of the family head.

The family head was not originally supposed to be a private owner of everybody's property. In many circumstances, he was a custodian and representative of the family. That distinction matters enormously today. Custodianship is not ownership. A family head entrusted with administering the estate of a deceased relative should not turn that responsibility into an opportunity for personal enrichment. Customary law itself is also not frozen in time. It develops as society develops. We should therefore be careful about saying, "This is our tradition," as though every practice attributed to tradition is ancient, universal and incapable of change. Tradition deserves respect. But tradition must also be understood.

Inheritance Is About More than Property

This is where sociology and anthropology become useful. Inheritance is not simply about who gets a house, farm, vehicle or bank account. It is about belonging. It answers deeper questions: Who is part of the family? Who continues the family line? Who represents the deceased? Who has authority over his property? Who is entitled to remain in the matrimonial home? And who has the power to decide what happens after death? In traditional societies, these questions could be answered largely through kinship.

But Ghanaian society has changed. Women now acquire property in their own names. They work, trade, farm, run businesses and contribute substantially to household wealth. Husbands and wives may jointly acquire property over decades of marriage. The modern household therefore cannot always be understood through the economic assumptions of an earlier generation.

This is one reason Ghana presents such an interesting example of legal pluralism — the coexistence and interaction of statutory law, customary law, religious norms and informal family practices. Research by Ama F. Hammond and Prosper Batariwah on Ghana's legally plural environment demonstrates precisely this tension. Their work shows how traditional understandings of the extended family can come into conflict with the realities of the modern nuclear family and contemporary legal values. That insight is important for inheritance. The family is changing. Property ownership is changing. Marriage is changing. But some assumptions about inheritance have not changed at the same speed.

The Widow at the Centre of a Legal Collision

Imagine a woman who has been married for 35 years. She and her husband have raised six children. They have built a house together. She has farmed with him. She has sold food to support the household. Perhaps she has used her savings to help complete the house. Then her husband dies. Before she has finished grieving, relatives begin asking: "Which property belongs to the family?" "Which room will she occupy?" "Who controls the farm?" "Who has the keys to the house?" "Who will administer the estate?"

The widow can suddenly find herself surrounded by people discussing her husband's property while she is still mourning his death. This is not merely a property problem. It is a question of power. Research into Ghana's legal pluralism makes this even more interesting. Fulera Issaka-Toure's study of Muslim family law in Accra found that women formed the majority of litigants seeking to improve their wellbeing by appealing to Islamic legal norms through Muslim scholars, or malamai. This should make us pause.

Sometimes the debate is presented as though Islam, customary law and women's interests are necessarily three opposing forces. Reality is more complicated. A Muslim woman may invoke Islam precisely because she believes Islamic law gives her rights that she fears may be denied under a particular customary practice.

What Ghanaian Law Says
Ghana's Constitution provides an important starting point. Article 17 establishes equality before the law and prohibits discrimination on grounds including gender and religion. Article 22 goes further in relation to spouses. It provides that a spouse should not be deprived of reasonable provision from the estate of a deceased spouse, whether or not the deceased left a will. It also recognizes equal access to property jointly acquired during marriage and equitable distribution of such property upon dissolution of the marriage.

Article 26 is equally important. It protects the right to practice and promote culture, tradition and religion --- but subject to the Constitution. It expressly states that customary practices which dehumanize or are injurious to the physical and mental wellbeing of a person are prohibited. This is an important constitutional balance. Ghana does not have to choose between respecting culture and protecting human dignity. It must do both.

PNDC Law 111 Changed the Conversation

The Intestate Succession Law, 1985 --- PNDC Law 111 --- was introduced to provide a statutory framework for the distribution of estates where a person dies without an effective will. Its importance cannot be overstated. The law deals with household chattels, the entitlement of spouses and children to a house in specified circumstances, distribution where the deceased leaves a spouse and children, and protection against the ejection of spouses. Section 16A specifically prohibits the ejection of spouses in circumstances covered by the law.

So the popular idea that a man's relatives can simply arrive after his funeral and throw his widow out of the matrimonial home because "this is family property" should not be accepted casually. The law must first be examined. But there is an important qualification.

PNDC Law 111 does not apply to every category of property. The law expressly excludes Stool, Skin and family property from its application. This distinction is critical. Not every piece of property associated with a deceased person is necessarily his personal property. But neither is every property he possessed automatically "family property." That is why property ownership should be clarified during one's lifetime.

Research by E.V.O. Dankwa found that PNDC Law 111 brought significant changes in favour of surviving spouses and children, but also found that the law was often honoured more in its breach than in its observance. That observation remains relevant. A good law is only as effective as people's knowledge of it and their willingness and ability to enforce it.

But What Happens When Islam, Custom and Statutory Law Collide?

Here we reach the most difficult part of the discussion. Ghana's legal history contains a complicated relationship between Islamic personal law and state law. The old Marriage of Mohammedans Ordinance had historically provided a route for Islamic succession in particular circumstances. Section 10 of that Ordinance, dealing with intestate succession, was repealed when PNDC Law 111 reformed Ghana's succession law in 1985.

But the story did not simply end there. K.Y. Yeboa's 1992 study examined the question of whether PNDC Law 111 had effectively ended the application of Islamic inheritance law among Ghanaian Muslims. His research, which included interviews with about 100 Muslims in Accra and surrounding communities, found that Muslims continued in practice to distribute intestate property according to Islamic law. This tells us something important. There is a difference between: what the law says, what religion prescribes, what custom says, and what families actually do. Those four things are not always identical. That is the essence of legal pluralism. And it is precisely why families need education.

The Family Head: Custodian or Beneficiary?

The institution of the family head is important in many Ghanaian communities. But authority creates responsibility. A family head should not become an interested party in the estate he has been entrusted to administer. He should not favour his brothers against a widow. He should not favour sons against daughters. He should not manipulate customary law for personal advantage. He should not take possession of property simply because the deceased has died. And he certainly should not intimidate a widow because she is a woman and therefore considered less able to defend herself.

The family head should be the guardian of fairness, not the beneficiary of confusion. This is not an attack on the institution of family headship. Quite the opposite. It is a call to restore the institution to its highest purpose. Leadership in the family should mean responsibility, protection and accountability.

And What about the Children?
The same principle applies to children. Children should not be left homeless while adults fight over their father's house. They should not be deprived of their education because relatives are quarrelling over the estate.

The Ghanaian Constitution itself provides that every child, whether or not born in wedlock, is entitled to reasonable provision from the estate of his or her parents. Whether the applicable succession framework is statutory, customary or Islamic, the interests and legitimate rights of children must be taken seriously. And where there are several wives in a polygamous household, the situation can become even more complicated.

Different households may have different property claims, and the death of the husband can expose inequalities that were never addressed during his lifetime. Again, clarity before death is better than conflict after death.

The Most Painful Accusation: Did the Widow Cause His Death?

There is another practice that deserves condemnation wherever it occurs: accusing a widow of causing the death of her husband. A woman loses her husband and, instead of receiving compassion, she is subjected to suspicion. What did she do? What happened between them? Was she responsible? Did she somehow cause his death? Such accusations can destroy a grieving woman psychologically and socially. They can also make a vulnerable widow easier to isolate and control.

Death should not become an excuse to manufacture guilt. If somebody dies under suspicious circumstances, there are lawful institutions for investigation. If there is evidence of a crime, the police and courts should deal with it. But an innocent widow should not be condemned by gossip, superstition or family suspicion. And certainly not simply because she is a widow.

Preparing Before Death Comes
This may be the most practical part of the entire conversation. Most people prepare for everything except death. Yet death is the one appointment none of us can cancel. Couples should therefore discuss their property and succession arrangements while they are alive. They should ask: What property belongs exclusively to the husband? What property belongs exclusively to the wife? What property was jointly acquired? What constitutes family property? What happens to the matrimonial home? What happens to farms and businesses? Who should administer the estate? What are the religious wishes of the couple? What does Ghanaian law require? What does each spouse want? These wishes should then be documented with competent legal advice.

Muslim couples should also seek advice from people properly trained in Islamic inheritance law. It is not enough to tell one's brothers, children or friends verbally.

Death creates disputes. Documents reduce disputes. Let Couples Know the Consequences of Marriage. And, perhaps we should go one step further. Before marriage, couples should be educated about the legal consequences of the type of marriage they are contracting. A couple should understand whether their marriage is customary, ordinance, Islamic or otherwise recognized under Ghanaian law, and what legal consequences follow from that status. This is particularly important for Muslims whose marriages may simultaneously involve Islamic rites and customary practices. The question should not be left until death. By then, it may be too late. A couple should not discover the legal consequences of their marriage only after one spouse has died.

Tradition Must Serve Justice
This discussion should not be framed as an attack on traditionalists. Our traditions are important parts of our identity. Islam is equally central to the lives of millions of Ghanaians and has its own well-developed principles concerning marriage, family and inheritance. Ghanaian law also has a legitimate role in protecting citizens from injustice. The challenge is to ensure that these systems do not collide at the expense of the most vulnerable person in the room. And very often, that person is the widow and her children.

We should therefore resist the temptation to describe the problem simply as "custom versus Islam." That would be too simplistic. The real issue is much broader: customary law, Islamic norms, statutory law, traditional authority, changing family structures and unequal economic power are all interacting. This is Ghana's reality as a legally plural society. The answer is not to abolish tradition. Nor is it to impose one inheritance system on everybody. The answer is to create greater clarity about the relationship between custom, religion and state law.

Let couples understand their rights. Let them document their property. Let Muslim couples understand fara'id. Let traditional authorities understand the limits of custodial authority. Let family heads understand that leadership is a responsibility, not an opportunity for personal enrichment. Let widows know that widowhood does not make them strangers to the family. And let children know that the death of their father does not mean the death of their rights.

My Thoughts
My proposal is simple. Before marriage, couples should be educated about the consequences of the type of marriage they contract.

During marriage, they should be encouraged to document their property and succession wishes. Muslim couples should be educated about fara'id. Ask the Muslim scholars for clarity. Couples marrying under customary law should understand the relevant customary implications. And all couples should understand Ghana's statutory requirements.

Where a couple wants Islamic principles to guide the disposition of their estate, they should obtain competent legal and religious advice on how their wishes can be properly documented within Ghana's legal framework. Where they want customary principles to play a role, those principles should equally be clearly understood and reconciled with Ghanaian law.

The worst arrangement is the one we have now in which people say nothing while alive and then, after death, several people suddenly become "experts" on what the deceased supposedly wanted. A society is judged not only by how it treats its kings, chiefs and successful men, but by how it treats those who become vulnerable.

The widow deserves dignity. The children deserve protection. The family deserves peace. The deceased deserves to have his legitimate wishes respected. And the family head deserves to be trusted --- but that trust must be accompanied by accountability. Tradition must serve justice. Religion must not be manipulated. Law must protect the vulnerable. And grief must never be turned into an opportunity for dispossession.

Perhaps the time has come for traditional authorities, Muslim scholars, lawyers, women's organizations, academics and families to have a serious national conversation about marriage, inheritance and the protection of widows. Because when a husband dies, the first question should not be: "How quickly can we take what he left behind?" The question should be: "How do we honour the deceased while ensuring that those he left behind are treated justly?" That is where tradition, Islam and justice should meet.

FUSEINI ABDULAI BRAIMAH
+233208282575 / +233550558008
afusb55@gmail.com

   Comments0