Are LGBTs Taking Over? - Part I

Ignoring history’s lessons and tradition’s warnings, the mental health establishment declared homosexuality normal and homosexuals socially harmless in the mid-1970s. By 1987, gays were bragging that they were so smart and so ( addicted ) committed that they would eventually control society and have sex with our children. With massive help from those who hold that ‘everyone has the right to do almost whatever they want sexually,’ homosexuals have constructed an impressive parallel society. This gay-centered structure generates useful propaganda to which gays can appeal when they want to further modify society. Evidence of their success includes:

Trans and ‘cisgender.’ What is more fundamental than the differences between women and men? Homosexuals created trans in 1952. Today scientific literature now uses ‘cisgender’ as a modifier for normals, and ‘trans woman’ or ‘trans man,’ or even ‘woman’ for a trans woman, and ‘man’ for a ‘trans man.’ When asked, ‘Do most medical, psychological, and sociological journals use 'cisgender'?’ GPT-5.4 mini (7/23): answered “broadly speaking, many medical, psychological, and sociological journals do use ‘cisgender,’ especially in research on gender identity, sexuality, health disparities, and social outcomes. It’s now a standard term in most scholarly contexts where it helps distinguish people whose gender identity aligns with sex assigned at birth from transgender people…. It is common across these fields, but not universally mandated. By the early 2010s, and clearly by the mid-2010s, “cisgender” had become common in academic and media usage. The first English use in a scientific journal I found is 2006, in the Journal of Lesbian Studies….scholarly adoption really took off after 2010.” Journal of Lesbian Studies (part of the gay structure) transformed science?

Although trans -- whether mutilated or filled with hormones -- lack either a functional vagina or penis, and trans can be attained by merely saying you feel like the opposite sex -- these faux ‘women’ or ‘men’ have changed the scientific literature. Enough professionals claim trans are ‘men’ or ‘women’ that birth certificates, passports, and school curricula have been changed to accommodate and push this gay creation on our children and vulnerable adults.

Created by the gay movement in 1952, trans is so politically important to Democrats that a Supreme Court Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson claimed to be unable to define ‘woman.’ Ever more of our children are being sucked into this madness (~1% of US kids now say they’ve adopted it).

The whole trans enterprise rests upon shoddy research.

For instance, when asked “Was the body of the first transexual in the US (e.g., Christine Jorgensen) ever examined, before or after death, to determine what had been done to him?

AI: I didn’t find evidence that Christine Jorgensen’s body was publicly examined after death to “determine what had been done.” The public record I found says she was cremated and her ashes were scattered, which points away from any postmortem examination. …surgeons and reporters later disclosed some details of her surgery while she was alive, and the press speculated about her anatomy. One source notes that reporters learned she had had her male genitalia removed but did not have a vagina until later surgery.”

Amazing, isn’t it? A he, became a she because ‘it’ put on female clothing and said so. Would the press report that I became a dog because I said so?.

Further, ‘she’ certainly didn’t have anything that looked like a vagina when he alerted the press in 1952. Medically, AI does not seem to know what a vagina is if asked in the context of trans. But when asked “what is a vagina it stated “A vagina is a muscular internal canal in female anatomy that connects the uterus to the outside of the body. It’s involved in menstruation, intercourse, and childbirth.” Getting back to whether LGBTs are taking over society….

The University of Minnesota is scheduled to release MyGenderDolls this fall. AI, which is almost totally pro-gay, said the dolls are a “therapeutic play tool for gender-diverse children ages 4–10. It started in the medical school’s Department of Family Medicine and Community Health…. children can choose bodies, genitals, clothes, hairclasss, and accessories [for the dolls] to help them talk about gender and bodies. The stated goal is to help kids express themselves, reduce shame, and build coping tools around body-related messages. It was developed by faculty [and is] intended for use by clinicians, educators, and mental-health providers.”

Are the genitals of these dolls interchangeable? AI: “Yes. The project’s description says kids can select different bodies, genitals, and internal reproductive organs, so the genital pieces are meant to be interchangeable.” This is monstrous!

Little kids who might be confused about their sex are going to be ‘informed’ by playing with dolls that have interchangeable “genitals and internal reproductive organs.”

These dolls support the bizarre notion that trans people have changed their sex. But this notion is dead wrong: changing genitalia or internal reproductive organs is impossible. No one has even come close to exchanging genitalia or reproductive organs. To have a baby, you must have been born a female. To impregnate, you must have been born a male. The University of Minnesota medical school is trying to solidify the gay-pushed notion to our society’s tiniest members -- that they can be either sex. The inventors of this lie hope for its use by “clinicians, educators, and mental-health providers” so kids can be persuaded to pursue ‘treatments’ that will transform them into infertile clients until they die!

This Department of Family Medicine and Community Health is bolstering the misinformation about trans procedures and outcomes to little children. This is ‘community health?’ This is ‘family medicine?’ No, this is elevating gay thinking as the authority.

Oregon will probably be ordering some of these doll sets.

As Sapir & Terdal reported in the Wall Street Journal on July 17: “at age 17, roughly 1 in every 240 girls and 1 in every 630 boys in Oregon received cross-sex hormones for ‘gender dysphoria’ between 2016 and 2023. These figures are triple and double the national average for 17-yr-old girls and boys, respectively.” Further, “cross-sex hormone use … was four to five times the national rate among 14- and 15-year-olds, and puberty-blocker use was more than five times the national rate at age 14.” The gay takeover is going swimmingly in Oregon.

“Among minors, transgender-related diagnoses in Oregon rose threefold between 2017 and 2023, according to a Manhattan Institute insurance database analysis. Hormone prescriptions and surgery became more common. In 2019 alone, 33 girls had double mastectomies and two had hysterectomies, becoming sterile.

“Oregon has slightly more than 1% of America’s teens, but between 2019 and 2023 its clinics accounted for at least 7% of all “gender-related” mastectomies…. During those years 26 minors had “bottom surgery”— 23 hysterectomies [e.g., of 23 girls] and three castrations [e.g., of 3 boys]. These things are always undercounted, but if we assume these statements in the WSJ about removing breasts are approximately true of sterilizations (e.g., 26) during these years, then the cockamamie homosexual notion that you can choose your sex resulted in ~ 700,000 US children claiming they were trans and ~400-600 ‘treated’ and sterilized -- about 2:1 girls.

Oregon authorized Medicaid coverage for ‘gender transition’ in 2015. OR bureaucrats estimated ~175 people would use these services each year, and yearly costs would not exceed $200,000. In 2015, the costs were over $720,000, and by 2024, they exceeded $12.3 million. AI says those “states with more favorable Medicaid and youth gender-affirming care policies are much more often Democratic-controlled, while restrictive policies are much more often in Republican-controlled states. The relationship isn’t perfect, but it’s strong.” So, if a child is being raised in a Democrat state, she is more apt to say she is or becoming trans, and more apt to receive hormones or surgeries to accompany such a declaration.

These ‘medically necessary’ hormones and surgeries are not risk-free, but disrupt “an adolescent’s natural hormone production and regulation.” “The goal is to mimic the appearance of the opposite sex or attain a sexually ambiguous appearance,” at the cost of the body’s regular functioning. “The known and suspected harms of these interventions include infertility, sexual dysfunction, cognitive impairment, cardiovascular disease, bone health problems, and cancer.” Given all these possible risks and the fact that so many EU nations have stopped providing these treatments for minors because of the uncertainties associated with them, is Oregon tracking the outcomes of its employment of ‘gender transition’ on minors?

AI said a

• “ report showing Oregon officials debated whether evidence for youth gender care was strong enough, and that a previously unpublished OHSU report found questionable evidence; work on it was halted after lawmakers acted in 2023.
• No clear Oregon audit or Medicaid report tracking long-term medical or mental-health outcomes for minors after treatment.
• So, the answer is: Oregon appears to track coverage and policy, not outcomes.”

What advances the despoliation of our society and threatens mankind?

Avoiding the truth about the social and psychological outcomes of being mutilated/treated with hormones or surgery. Protecting ideology, not persons, as exampled above. Spending millions on propaganda and the ruination of children.

What would you bet that LGBTs are deeply involved in running this sorry program?

These are the funds from which treating children with cancers or other serious maladies come. Should trans insanity divert funding from obviously legitimate pursuits to save lives? Are the funds for this travesty not taken from our taxes?

So far, homosexuals are “so smart and so ( addicted ) committed” that they are controlling parts of society. Thanks to their efforts, millions of US children are being infected with trans and LGBT notions.

No wonder President Truman called homosexuals “perverts,” and they were characterized as “wicked” by President Eisenhower! Both worked to ban them from wielding government power.

Paul Cameron, Ph.D.
Chairman, Family Research Institute
www.familyresearchinst.org

   Comments0