Why The NPP Can’t Redeem Itself For 2028 Unless Akufo‑Addo Is Removed From The Party

In every functioning system, whether a government, a corporation, or a major institution, accountability begins at the top. When a company collapses, shareholders do not blame the junior staff; they blame the CEO. When a bank fails, the public does not accuse the tellers; they question the managing director.

Leadership carries responsibility, and when leadership fails, the consequences fall on the entire organization. Ghana is no different. When a government collapses the economy, destroys investor confidence, and drives institutions into bankruptcy, the blame does not fall on MPs or party communicators. It falls on the president who led the administration.

This is the uncomfortable truth the New Patriotic Party (NPP) has refused to confront since its defeat in the 2024 elections. The economic crisis, the debt distress, the IMF bailout, the collapse of local businesses, the loss of investor trust, and the widespread allegations of corruption and state capture did not happen in a vacuum.

They happened under the leadership of former President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo‑Addo. Yet, instead of acknowledging this reality, the NPP has chosen silence, denial, and internal protectionism, hoping to rebuild its image for 2028 without addressing the root cause of its downfall.

The Agyapadie Document and the Perception of State Capture

One of the most damaging issues associated with the Akufo‑Addo administration was the emergence of the controversial “Agyapadie” document, which many Ghanaians interpreted as a blueprint for how state assets, natural resources, and key financial institutions could be placed under the control of politically connected individuals.

Whether the document was official or not, its circulation deepened public suspicion that the administration was more focused on consolidating wealth and influence than safeguarding national resources. This perception was reinforced by scandals such as the Agyapa Royalties deal, the PDS debacle, the COVID‑19 expenditure controversies, and the persistent illegal mining crisis, where political interference was widely alleged.

These events collectively shaped the belief that the Akufo‑Addo-Mahamudu Bawumia government presided over a period of unprecedented state capture, weakening the moral and political credibility of the NPP.

Why the NPP lost in 2024, and why they still Can’t admit the truth

The NPP’s defeat in 2024 was not caused by propaganda or opposition strategy; it was the direct result of the lived experiences of Ghanaians. High inflation, business closures, rising taxes, unemployment, and a crushing debt crisis pushed the country into another IMF program. Many citizens felt betrayed after years of promises that never materialized.

Yet, despite these realities, the NPP leadership has refused to publicly acknowledge Akufo‑Addo’s central role in the party’s downfall. Instead, they have attempted to shift blame on Mahama, the current president, who in less than two years has impressively developed projects the NPP couldn’t achieve in eight years.

The NPP wouldn’t let the former Ghanaian leader admit his errors, since each of them benefited from his corrupt administration. Rather, they defend his legacy or pretend the crisis was caused by external forces. This refusal to confront the truth has prevented the party from beginning the process of rebuilding trust with the Ghanaian people.

Why Akufo‑Addo must be removed from the NPP for the party to survive

If the NPP genuinely wants to rebuild itself and regain credibility before the 2028 elections, it must demonstrate a clean break from the leadership class and governance failures associated with Akufo‑Addo’s administration. Keeping him within the party’s inner circle sends a clear message that the NPP stands by everything that happened under his watch.

Removing him would signal a new beginning, a bold declaration that the party recognizes its mistakes and is ready to chart a different path. It would also empower new leaders to redefine the party’s direction without interference from the old guard, whose influence continues to shape internal decisions and public perception.

Political Reality: The NPP Can’t be redeemed without accountability

The NPP’s biggest obstacle is not the NDC or any political opponent; it is the shadow of Akufo‑Addo’s presidency. As long as he remains a symbol of the party, it reminds Ghanaians how the NPP has led to economic collapse, corruption allegations, institutional decay, broken promises, and the impact of debt restructuring on Ghanaians.

No amount of rebranding, communication strategy, or campaign messaging can erase these political and financial crimes. Only accountability, real, visible accountability, can begin to restore public confidence. Without it, the party will remain trapped in the consequences of its own silence and denial and will never rule Ghana again.

What Ghana and the NPP stand to gain if Akufo‑Addo is removed

Removing Akufo‑Addo from the party would bring significant benefits to both Ghana and the NPP. For Ghanaians, it would strengthen the culture of accountability and send a powerful message that no leader is above scrutiny. It would also raise the standards of governance and reinforce democratic values.

For the NPP, it would offer a fresh start, a chance to rebuild trust, reconnect with disillusioned supporters, and present a credible alternative in 2028. It would free the party from the burden of defending the past and allow it to craft a new ideological direction rooted in transparency, competence, and genuine reform.

Most importantly, it would give the party the moral authority to say it has learned from its mistakes and is ready to serve the nation again.

Belgian‑Ghanaian journalist Joel Savage writes the column “A Mixture of Periodicals.” A former member of the Flemish Journalists Association, he has contributed to the Weekly Spectator, Ghanaian Times, Daily Graphic and The Mirror.

Disclaimer: "The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect ModernGhana official position. ModernGhana will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements in the contributions or columns here."

   Comments0

More From Author