Unmasking the Truth: The Structural Roots and Political Exploitation of the Dagbon and Bawku Conflicts

The recurring conflicts in Dagbon and Bawku are frequently reduced to sensationalized headlines and partisan blame games. Political commentators often attribute these crises to modern party conspiracies, claiming they were engineered from scratch to capture votes. However, a rigorous historical interrogation reveals a completely different reality: these disputes are deeply rooted in pre-colonial structural arrangements and divisive British colonial policies.

For decades, successive post-independence governments have exploited these existing fractures, using state legislation and security apparatuses as tools for electoral engineering. This comprehensive, historical expose unpacks the truth behind the Dagbon and Bawku conflicts, tracing their evolution from colonial distortions to modern political battlegrounds, and offers a definitive blueprint for everlasting peace.

The Historical Anatomy of the Dagbon Conflict

The Dagbon crisis is fundamentally a rotational succession dispute within the same royal family, weaponized over time by national political regimes.

• The 19th-Century Origin: The division of the Dagomba kingship into the Abudu and Andani gates dates back to the death of Yaa Naa Yakubu I in 1839. His sons, Abudulai (Abudu) and Andani, established the two royal houses meant to alternate occupying the skin.
• The 1948 Fracture: Long before Ghana’s independence, the traditional rotation system cracked due to internal selection manipulation during the selection of Yaa Naa Mahama III. Looking for leverage, both gates began seeking alliances with external political actors to secure the throne.
• The 1969 Yendi Skin Clashes: Following a disputed succession, the National Liberation Council (NLC) military regime overrode the traditional selection committee to gazette Yaa Naa Mahamadu Abdulai IV (an Abudu). In September 1969, when Dr. Kofi Abrefa Busia’s Progress Party (PP) took power, state security forces violently enforced the Abudu king’s position, opening fire on Andani protesters at the Gbewaa Palace, killing several individuals.
• The 1974 Legislative Reversal: After Busia was overthrown, General Ignatius Kutu Acheampong’s National Redemption Council (NRC) military regime set up the Ollennu Committee. The state used this committee to de-gazette the Abudu king and officially enstool Yaa Naa Yakubu Andani II, embedding decades of deep structural resentment between the gates.
• The 2002 Gbewaa Palace Tragedy: Tensions regarding the performance of funeral rites for the late Abudu king boiled over under the John Kufuor administration. From March 25–27, 2002, security failures culminated in a three-day siege and the brutal assassination of Yaa Naa Yakubu Andani II along with 40 of his elders. The Wuaku Commission of Inquiry later concluded it was a localized escalation of the decades-old chieftaincy dispute rather than a top-tier state conspiracy, though the political fallout deeply fractured the region.
• The 2019 Resolution: Decades of deadlock were broken when the Committee of Eminent Chiefs, led by the Asantehene (Otumfuo Osei Tutu II), successfully mediated the performance of the funerals for both late kings, leading to the peaceful enstoolment of Yaa Naa Abukari Mahama II on January 26, 2019.

The Historical Anatomy of the Bawku Conflict

Unlike Dagbon, the Bawku conflict is an inter-ethnic struggle over land ownership, indigenous identity, and political paramountcy between the Mamprusi and Kusasi ethnic groups.

• Pre-Colonial Separation of Power: Historically, the Kusasi operated an acephalous (decentralized) societal structure led by Tendaanas (Earth Priests), who served as spiritual custodians of the land. The neighboring Mamprusi possessed a highly centralized kingdom ruled by the Nayiri. The two groups coexisted without structural absorption.
• Colonial Distortion via Indirect Rule: In 1902, the British colonial administration introduced Indirect Rule to collect taxes and enforce labor efficiently. Viewing the decentralized Kusasi system as "primitive," the British placed the entire Bawku area and its Kusasi demographic majority under the direct political and legal suzerainty of the Mamprusi Nayiri.
• The Subversion of Land Rights: Colonial rule legally reinterpreted land tenure—traditionally a communal asset guarded by the Tendaana—as a political property belonging to the Mamprusi "Skin". This gave Mamprusi chiefs absolute (allodial) rights over Kusasi lands and forced the Kusasi to pay mandatory land tributes.
• The 1958 Post-Independence Shift: Recognizing that the Mamprusi traditional leadership supported the opposition United Party (UP), Kwame Nkrumah’s CPP government established the Opoku-Afari Committee. In 1958, the state officially recognized the Kusasi claim to the Bawku Skin and installed Bawku Naba Abugrago Azoka I, turning chieftaincy into an electoral bargaining chip.
• The 1966 Military Intervention: Following Nkrumah's overthrow, the NLC military regime passed National Liberation Council Decree 112 (NLCD 112). This law stripped the Kusasi chief of recognition and handed the Bawku Skin and its lands back to the Mamprusi.
• The 1985 PNDC Law 75: After years of bloody clashes fueled by NLCD 112, Jerry Rawlings’ PNDC military government enacted PNDC Law 75 (The Chieftaincy Restoration Law). This repealed the previous decree and restored Kusasi paramountcy. This legal pendulum locked both groups into a zero-sum game that flares up during every national election cycle.

The Tragic Costs: Human, Economic, and Social Tolls

These conflicts have extracted an unbearable price from the citizens of Ghana, draining public funds and devastating innocent human lives.

1. The Human and Social Cost (Irreplaceable Lives Lost)

• Mass Casualties: The 2002 Dagbon crisis directly claimed the life of the Yaa Naa and 40 of his advisory council members. In Bawku, the numbers are staggeringly higher; recurring violence between 2007–2009, and a severe escalation post-November 2021, have resulted in over 300 documented deaths according to the Ghana Graphic Online, with local security experts estimating the broader regional toll to exceed 1,000 casualties.
• Shattered Social Fabric: In Bawku and its surrounding districts (Binduri, Pusiga, Garu, and Tempane), inter-ethnic marriages have dissolved. Basic activities are paralyzed by strict 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM curfews.
• Educational and Human Capital Devastation: Over 45 public and private schools in the Bawku municipality have shut down intermittently, with hundreds of teachers and health professionals fleeing the area for safety.

2. The Financial and Economic Cost

• State Expenditure: According to the Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), maintaining the Joint Security Task Force (military and police deployment) in Bawku alone drains an astronomical GHC 6 million every single month from public funds.
• Historical Financial Drain: Historically, during the 2002 Dagbon crisis, the state spent over 7 billion old Cedis (equivalent to $9 million at the time) on feeding 395 soldiers, 250 police officers, and funding the Wuaku Commission sittings. These are critical funds diverted directly away from regional clinics, roads, and schools.
• Complete Market Collapse: Bawku, once the vibrant multi-million Cedi economic hub of the Upper East transit corridor connecting Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Togo, has faced an economic nosedive. Local agricultural output has plummeted, transport lines are regularly blocked, and youth unemployment among the area's 93,000 young people has led to mass migration to southern slums.

Actionable Recommendations for Everlasting Peace

To transition Northern Ghana from volatile political exploitation to sustainable development, all major stakeholders must implement structural, legal, and cultural reforms.

For the Executive and Legislative Arms of Government

• Enforce the Constitutional Freeze on Chieftaincy Interference: Total alignment with Chapter 26 of the 1992 Constitution must be observed. The state must permanently cease using executive instruments or political favoritism to gazette or de-gazette traditional leaders for electoral gains.
• Establish an Independent Border and Demarcation Commission: A judicial and geographical commission must clearly map and document boundaries and land ownership structures in the Upper East Region to decouple political chieftaincy from the absolute economic displacement of minority groups.

For Political Parties (NPP, NDC, and others)

• Sign a Binding Inter-Party Peace Accord on Chieftaincy: Political leadership must sign a formal pact committing to remove chieftaincy promises from their campaign manifestos. Weaponizing the Bawku or Dagbon skins for votes must be treated as a violation of national security codes.
• Depoliticize Local Security Appointments: Security chiefs, regional ministers, and District Chief Executives (DCEs) in conflict zones must be appointed based on neutral, professional track records rather than party loyalty to prevent the compromise of early-warning intelligence.

For Traditional Authorities and the National House of Chiefs

• Codify Lines of Succession: The National House of Chiefs must accelerate the formal codification of customary laws and lines of succession for all northern skins to prevent arbitrary interpretations when a sitting monarch passes away.
• Re-engage the Committee of Eminent Chiefs for Bawku: Following the successful Dagbon model, an independent panel of highly revered, non-aligned traditional rulers (such as the Asantehene, the Togbe Afede, and the Yaa Naa) should be empowered to mediate a binding customary settlement between the Mamprusi and Kusasi leadership.

For Civil Society, Youth Groups, and Citizens

• De-link Customary Rights from Party Politics: Local youth associations must actively reject the narrative that their ethnic survival depends on the victory of a specific national political party.
• Invest in Economic Peace Dividends: Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and international partners must redirect focus toward creating jobs, establishing cross-ethnic agricultural cooperatives, and building vocational schools to engage marginalized youths who are easily mobilized for violence.

Conclusion

The tragedy of Northern Ghana's conflicts does not lie in an ancient inability of its people to coexist, but rather in how masterfully their historical vulnerabilities have been weaponized for modern political power. The structural damage inflicted by British colonial engineering was never healed; instead, it was converted into a political pendulum by post-independence regimes. Dagbon has shown that through patient, neutral, and deeply respected traditional mediation, long-standing wounds can close. Bawku can achieve the same victory. True peace will not arrive through military curfews or partisan promises, but through an unwavering commitment to historical truth, the total depoliticization of traditional thrones, and an equitable distribution of land rights. It is time for Ghana to choose permanent development over temporary electoral victories.

✍️By A Concerned Retired Senior Citizen

For and on behalf of all Senior Citizens of the Republic of Ghana 🇬🇭

Teshie-Nungua
akpaluck@gmail.com

   Comments0