The Price Of Journalistic Truth In Nigeria

In Nigeria, journalism remains one of the most misunderstood professions. It is a profession that is celebrated when it serves the interests of the powerful and condemned when it challenges them. Journalists are applauded when their reports align with the expectations of politicians, business leaders, religious figures, ethnic champions, and ordinary citizens. Yet, the same journalists are vilified the moment they publish facts that make these same individuals uncomfortable.

For the sake of clarity, journalistic truth is the ethical principle that guides journalists in the pursuit and reporting of accurate, reliable, and credible information. It requires journalists to present facts as accurately as possible, free from distortion or misrepresentation, while ensuring fairness by considering diverse viewpoints and avoiding undue bias. Journalistic truth is not a fixed destination but an ongoing process that involves gathering relevant evidence, verifying information, and remaining open to new facts as they emerge. By adhering to these standards, journalists strengthen public trust and uphold the credibility of the media. Ultimately, journalistic truth represents a commitment to ethical reporting that serves as the foundation of responsible journalism and helps keep society well-informed.

This contradictory attitude has become one of the greatest challenges facing journalists in Nigeria. Indeed, it can rightly be described as one of the enduring burdens of the profession and a major obstacle to the growth of a truly democratic society.

For many Nigerians, journalists are considered good only when they are favorably mentioned. The moment a report casts a shadow on a preferred politician, exposes wrongdoing within an organization, questions the conduct of a religious leader, or presents facts that contradict deeply held beliefs, journalists suddenly become enemies, propagandists, blackmailers, or agents of hidden interests.

This dangerous tendency has continued to weaken public trust in journalism and has made the work of journalists far more difficult than it ought to be.

At the heart of journalism lies a simple responsibility: the pursuit and dissemination of truth. Journalists are expected to inform the public, hold power accountable, investigate wrongdoing, and provide citizens with the information they need to make informed decisions. These responsibilities are not designed to make everyone happy. In fact, if journalism is being done properly, it will often make some people uncomfortable.

The reason is obvious. Truth is not always pleasant. Facts do not always support personal opinions. Reality does not always conform to expectations.

Yet in Nigeria, many people expect journalism to function as a public relations tool rather than as an independent institution. They want journalists to praise their political allies, celebrate their ethnic groups, protect their business interests, and promote their personal narratives. When this happens, journalists are hailed as professionals. When it does not, they are condemned as enemies. This phenomenon has become deeply entrenched in the nation's public discourse.

Consider the reaction that often follows investigative reports exposing corruption. If the individual implicated belongs to a rival political camp, many citizens praise the journalist's courage and professionalism. Social media platforms become flooded with commendations for the reporter's bravery and commitment to accountability.

However, when the same journalist investigates a politician supported by those same admirers, the narrative changes instantly. The journalist is accused of bias. Questions are raised about motives. Personal attacks begin. Some demand retractions even when the facts remain unchallenged.

The issue is not the quality of the journalism. The issue is whose interests are affected. This pattern extends beyond politics.

A journalist who reports on financial misconduct in a corporation may be praised by employees seeking justice, yet attacked by company executives and their supporters. A reporter covering religious controversies may be celebrated by critics of a particular denomination while being condemned by members of that faith community.

The reaction is often determined not by whether the report is accurate but by whether it serves personal interests. Unfortunately, this mindset has created a hostile environment for journalists across Nigeria.

Reporters frequently face threats, intimidation, online harassment, and reputational attacks simply for doing their jobs. Rather than engage with the facts presented in a report, critics often focus on discrediting the messenger. This approach shifts attention away from substantive issues and transforms legitimate journalism into a battleground of personal emotions, political loyalties, and sectional interests.

In many cases, journalists become victims of the very accountability they seek to promote. Ironically, the challenge is not confined to politicians, public officials, corporate executives, religious leaders, or members of the public. It also exists within the journalism profession itself.

Inside many Nigerian newsrooms, editors and reporters sometimes find themselves divided over stories, not necessarily because of factual inaccuracies or professional shortcomings, but because of differences in worldview. Depending on where individuals stand sociologically, culturally, ethnically, religiously, or politically, they may interpret the same story in very different ways.

A reporter may consider a particular story balanced, factual, and newsworthy, while an editor may see it differently because of personal experiences, ideological convictions, cultural influences, or political inclinations. Similarly, journalists often disagree over story angles, headlines, placement, prominence, and framing. What one journalist considers objective reporting; another may view as unfair or insensitive.

Such disagreements are not unique to Nigeria. Journalism is a human enterprise, and journalists themselves are products of the societies in which they live. They carry their experiences, values, beliefs, and biases into the newsroom. The challenge arises when professional judgment becomes subordinate to personal sentiment.

There are instances where a journalist is praised by colleagues when a report aligns with their shared perspectives, only to face criticism when reporting facts that challenge those same perspectives. In such situations, the familiar paradox resurfaces: a journalist is regarded as competent when he agrees with us and incompetent when he does not.

This reality underscores an important truth. The struggle for objectivity is not merely a battle between journalists and the public. It is also a continuous struggle within the profession itself.

The best newsrooms are not those where everyone thinks alike. Rather, they are those where vigorous debate is encouraged, where diverse opinions are welcomed, and where facts ultimately prevail over personal preferences.

The irony of the entire situation is striking. The same people who celebrate press freedom when journalists expose their opponents often oppose that freedom when scrutiny reaches their own doorstep. They champion transparency selectively. They defend investigative reporting only when it benefits them. Such inconsistency undermines the democratic values they claim to support.

The situation becomes even more troubling in an era dominated by social media. Today, information spreads faster than ever before. Unfortunately, misinformation and disinformation spread just as quickly. In this environment, professional journalism should be more valuable than ever. Instead, journalists increasingly find themselves competing against conspiracy theories, partisan propaganda, ethnic narratives, and emotionally driven interpretations of events.

Social media has amplified the tendency to divide journalists into simplistic categories of "good" and "bad." Complex stories are reduced to ideological battles. Nuanced reporting is interpreted through political lenses. Objectivity itself is sometimes viewed with suspicion because many people have become accustomed to consuming information that merely reinforces their existing beliefs.

The result is a growing crisis of trust. Yet trust cannot be rebuilt if society continues to evaluate journalism based on personal preferences rather than professional standards. The proper way to assess journalism is through questions such as: Was the report accurate? Were the facts verified? Was the information presented fairly? Were multiple perspectives considered? Was there accountability for errors? These are the standards that matter. Whether a report praises or criticizes an individual should not determine its credibility.

Unfortunately, many Nigerians have embraced a different standard. For them, favorable coverage equals good journalism, while unfavorable coverage equals bad journalism. This attitude not only harms journalists but also weakens society's ability to confront difficult truths.

No democracy can thrive when citizens reject information simply because it challenges their assumptions. A healthy society requires journalists who can ask uncomfortable questions without fear of being labeled enemies. It requires citizens who can distinguish between factual reporting and personal preference. It requires leaders who understand that scrutiny is not persecution but a necessary component of accountability. Not leaders who threaten to shoot a broadcaster on television screen.

Journalists are not perfect. They are human beings working within imperfect institutions. Mistakes occur. Biases can emerge. Ethical lapses sometimes happen. These realities should not be ignored. When journalists violate professional standards, they should be held accountable. However, accountability should be based on evidence of wrongdoing, not on dissatisfaction with the content of a report.

Too often, critics confuse unfavorable reporting with unethical journalism. They assume that because a story damages someone's reputation, the journalist must have acted maliciously. This assumption is both unfair and dangerous.

Many of the most important stories in history have been deeply uncomfortable. Investigations into corruption, human rights abuses, electoral malpractice, abuse of power, and corporate misconduct rarely produce favorable headlines for those involved and assessment of the performance of a governor or president seeking for a second term in office. Yet such reporting serves the public interest. If journalists were to publish only stories that pleased everyone, journalism would cease to exist as a meaningful profession.

Without any iota of exaggeration, Nigeria's democratic development depends heavily on the strength and independence of its media. Citizens need journalists who can report freely, question authority, and uncover facts without fear of retaliation. They need reporters who are committed to truth rather than popularity.

The challenge facing Nigerian journalism today is not merely political pressure, economic hardship, declining revenues, or security concerns. It is also the widespread tendency among both the public and even some practitioners to judge journalism through the prism of personal convenience and ideological comfort.

As long as people continue to believe that journalists are good when they praise them and bad when they criticize them, the profession will remain trapped in an impossible situation.

The truth is that journalists are neither saints nor villains. They are professionals entrusted with the difficult task of navigating facts, power, public interest, and human complexity. Their role is not to comfort everyone. Their role is to inform everyone.

A mature society understands this distinction. The real measure of journalism is not whether it flatters us or offends us. It is whether it seeks the truth, presents it fairly, and remains accountable to the public.

Until Nigerians begin to judge journalism by these standards rather than by personal feelings, political loyalties, ethnic affiliations, religious sentiments, or ideological preferences, journalists will continue to pay the price for telling the truth. And that price remains one of the greatest burdens of journalism in Nigeria today.

   Comments0