When An MP Attacks A Judge: The Dangerous Path Afenyo‑Markin Has Chosen

Ghana has entered a troubling moment, one that exposes the fragility of our democratic institutions and the growing recklessness of political actors who should know better. The recent outburst by the minority leader, Alexander Afenyo‑Markin, attacking a sitting judge over the arrest and remand of NPP politician Abronye DC, is not just political theater. It is a direct assault on the judiciary, the Constitution, and the democratic order that holds this country together.

For years, Ghanaians witnessed how the Akufo‑Addo administration packed the judiciary with loyalists, appointed judges whose rulings consistently favored the New Patriotic Party, and weaponized state institutions against critics. Journalists were arrested, activists were intimidated, and political opponents were dragged before courts on questionable charges.

Under that climate, the NPP never complained about judicial overreach or constitutional violations. They benefited from it. Today, however, the same party that enjoyed judicial protection is attacking the courts because one of their own, Kwame Baffoe Abronye, has been arrested and remanded. Instead of urging calm, respect for due process, or legal redress, Afenyo‑Markin chose the path of confrontation, accusing the judiciary of “state‑sponsored political persecution” and claiming that the arrest violates Article 21 of the Constitution.

His argument centers on four points: alleged violation of free speech, judicial censorship, improper detention, and the need for a constitutional challenge. However, beyond the legal rhetoric lies a deeper and more dangerous issue: a sitting Member of Parliament, and the Minority Leader no less, publicly attacking a judge and undermining the authority of the courts.

This is not normal political criticism. It is a reckless act with serious implications. When an MP attacks a judge, it signals a breakdown of respect for the separation of powers. It encourages the public to distrust the courts. It emboldens political actors to defy judicial authority, and it sends a chilling message to judges: rule in our favor or face public humiliation.

Such behavior is not merely irresponsible; it is corrosive to democracy. In every functioning democracy, the judiciary is the last line of defense. When politicians lose respect for the courts, the entire constitutional order begins to collapse. Ghana has already seen worrying signs: political interference in prosecutions, selective justice, and the erosion of judicial independence. Afenyo‑Markin’s attack adds fuel to that fire.

Is Afenyo-Markin’s action a treason? No, however, it is a constitutional affront. Is it a crime against democracy? It is certainly an attack on democratic norms. Is it misconduct? Absolutely. Should he be sanctioned? Parliament must decide, but the precedent is dangerous. Should he remain Minority Leader? That is a question the NPP must confront honestly.

A leader who undermines the judiciary can’t claim to defend democracy. A leader who insults judges can’t claim to uphold the Constitution. A leader who encourages public distrust in the courts can’t guide Parliament with integrity. The consequences of his actions are far‑reaching. They weaken public confidence in justice and deepen political polarization. Ghana can't afford that path.

The judiciary can be criticized, but criticism must be grounded in respect, evidence, and constitutional procedure, not insults, intimidation, or political threats. Afenyo‑Markin’s outburst reveals a deeper truth: the NPP is struggling to adjust to life outside power. They once controlled the courts, the security agencies, and the national narrative. However, now in the opposition, the NPP feels daily as if the whole world is against them.

Democracy does not work only when it favors you. The rule of law does not apply only to your opponents, and judges are not political punching bags. In the end, this episode may mark the beginning of the political decline of Afenyo‑Markin. A minority leader who can’t control his temper, who attacks the judiciary, and who undermines constitutional order is not a leader prepared for the future of Ghana’s democracy.

His words have consequences, his actions have implications, and his attack on the judiciary may well be remembered as the moment he lost the moral authority to lead. Ghana deserves better, our democracy deserves better, and our judiciary deserves respect, not political insults.

   Comments0