How Africa helped forge French billionaire Vincent Bolloré's empire of influence
Heir to a family fortune built in paper manufacturing, Bolloré steadily transformed the business into a sprawling network of commercial and political influence.
First expanding through transport and commodity interests, more recently he has strengthened his position through television, radio, newspapers and publishing, reshaping parts of the French media landscape in the process.
Africa was central to that expansion. Through ports, concessions, warehouses and freight operations, Bolloré built a dominant position in transport and logistics across parts of West and Central Africa, where access to ports is critical to national economies.
African networks
For years, Bolloré Africa Logistics (BAL) was one of the most important private companies in the sector. Before it changed ownership in 2022 and later became Africa Global Logistics, BAL controlled 16 container terminals, 2,700 km of railways and logistics hubs across more than 40 African countries.
In 2021, the company generated €2.3 billion in annual revenue through concessions including Lomé in Togo, Conakry in Guinea, Abidjan and San Pedro in Côte d'Ivoire, Tema in Ghana and Dakar in Senegal. Bolloré-owned rail lines connected several of the ports to inland regions.
But Bolloré's relentless expansion drew scrutiny.
In 2013, French investigators started examining allegations that the group used political influence to help secure business deals in several African countries.
It was suspected of providing the services of its political consulting subsidiary, Euro RSCG (now Havas), at a discount to help presidents Faure Gnassingbé and Alpha Condé mount 2010 election campaigns in Togo and Guinea in exchange for port concessions. Both leaders went on to win.
Bolloré was formally placed under investigation in 2018. He denies any wrongdoing. The third container terminal at the port of Lomé in Togo, pictured in April 2015.
In 2021, the Bolloré group paid a €12 million fine to settle charges against the company.
Meanwhile Bolloré and two of his executives, Gilles Alix et Jean-Philippe Dorent, sought to avoid personal prosecution by agreeing to fines of €375,000 each.
“When you put this against the presumed fortune of Vincent Bolloré, it was a fairly light fine,” says Emma Taillefer, president of French anti-corruption campaign group Anticor, which joined the proceedings as a civil party in 2022.
“We did not want negotiated justice,” she says. Emma Taillefer, president of Anticor, in Paris on 6 May 2026.
A Paris judge eventually rejected the plea deal on the grounds that the allegations were too serious to resolve without a public hearing.
In March, the financial prosecutor's office announced that Bolloré is set to stand trial at the Paris criminal court from 7 to 17 December 2026, on charges of bribery of a foreign public official in Togo and complicity in breach of trust in Togo and Guinea.
Alix and Dorent will also be tried.
French business tycoon Vincent Bolloré retires, but unlikely to let go
Pivot to media
In 2022, the Bolloré group sold its logistics operations in Africa to shipping giant MSC for €5.7 billion.
According to West Africa analyst Jenny Ouedraogo of left-wing German think tank the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, Bolloré “had become a liability” on the continent as a result of the corruption allegations. However, she points out that “the exit from port logistics coincided with a major expansion in media”.
Starting in 2020, the Canal+ media group – which Bolloré controls through his majority stake in the Vivendi conglomerate – began buying shares in MultiChoice, Africa's largest subscription TV service. It acquired it fully in 2025.
“Withdrawing from port logistics was not a retreat from Africa. It was a repositioning within it,” Ouedraogo writes. The logo of French media group Canal+ outside a company building in Issy-les-Moulineaux near Paris, France.
“This is not a fundamentally different kind of power,” says Toussaint Nothias, a researcher at New York University who specialises in media and journalism in Africa.
“In a way, Bolloré represents a distinctive crossover between an older, post-colonial model of power rooted in control over ports and physical infrastructure, and the newer logic of global media conglomerates.”
'Economic imperialism'
Taillefer agrees that Bolloré's business interests in Africa represent a continuation of European influence on the continent.
“We are still in a form of imperialism, economic imperialism that is now led by private actors and less and less by public actors,” she says.
She notes that civil society often leads the scrutiny of business deals between African governments and Western companies.
In March 2025, a coalition of 11 NGOs from six African countries, the Restitution for Africa Collective (RAF), filed a civil suit in France accusing the Bolloré group of profiting from unlawful operations by its BAL logistics business.
Their objective: to recover all or part of the €5.7 billion obtained by Bolloré from the sale of its African activities in 2022, and redistribute the funds to communities in Africa. A Bolloré Logistics hub at Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris, pictured in April 2019.
In France, Taillefer accuses Bolloré of using his media assets to help him avoid scrutiny.
“The media empire that he has built along the years allows him today to cover and control information and it enables him to be much less exposed than he should be in a democracy,” she says.
The media that he controls rarely report the allegations against him, she claims, and when they do, coverage focuses on the economic angle rather than the political or legal implications.
'French Rupert Murdoch'
Via Vivendi and related holdings, Bolloré has amassed a media empire that includes right-wing TV news channel CNews, the Europe 1 radio station and conservative Sunday newspaper the Journal du Dimanche.
Since coming under Bolloré's control, staff at several outlets have complained of seeing their institutions gradually reshaped from within – a pattern French commentators dubbed “Bollorisation”.
Employees report pressure to shift editorial priorities and privilege different ideological emphases, intervention in hiring decisions, and tighter managerial control.
The Grasset affair is the latest example. In April, some 170 authors left the Bolloré-controlled publishing house after its longtime chief editor was forced to leave.
French media mogul Bolloré defiant as authors quit his publisher en masse A bookshop run by Grasset publishing house in Paris.
In an opinion piece in his Journal du Dimanche, Bolloré pointed to poor financial results and a disagreement over the timing of a forthcoming publication.
But in an open letter announcing their exit, prominent authors denounced it as "an unacceptable attack on the editorial independence” of Grasset.
The episode raises the question what happens when a powerful industrial group takes control of institutions that are supposed to protect editorial freedom.
In its 2026 index of press freedom, a year from presidential elections in France, Reporters Without Borders sounded the alarm over the concentration of privately owned French media “in the hands of a few businessmen”.
Press freedom at lowest level in 25 years, warns Reporters Without Borders
Today, the French media landscape is largely controlled by Bolloré and three other business moguls: luxury tycoon Bernard Arnault, who owns Les Echos and Le Parisien; his son-in-law and fellow billionaire Xavier Niel, who now controls Le Monde, and logistics magnate Rodolphe Saadé, who owns the news broadcaster BFMTV.
Bolloré is often described as the “French Rupert Murdoch”, notes media expert Nothias, who says the conservative Catholic billionaire has played “a significant role in shifting parts of the French media landscape toward the far right”.
"This matters because media institutions do more than report events: they shape public agendas – what issues are seen as important, which voices are amplified, and which are marginalised,” he says.
“In media studies, this is referred to as 'agenda-setting power': the media influence not necessarily what people think, but what they think about.”