Politics › NDC       02.03.2021

Here's why NDC MPs rejected Hawa Koomson, Oppong Nkrumah, Afriyie Akoto’s nominations

Members of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) on Parliament's Appointments Committee rejected the approval of three ministers-designate and have further held the nomination of five other nominees.

The three rejected are Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, minister-designate for Information; Hawa Koomson, Minister-designate for Fisheries and Aquaculture Development and Owusu Afriyie Akoto, minister-designate for Food and Agriculture.

For Mrs. Koomson, the NDC MPs said she “displayed an alarmingly abysmal lack of knowledge on the sector she was nominated for.”

The MPs also said she “could not provide convincing grounds for the shooting incident during the Voter Registration Exercise in Kasoa on 20th July, 2020 even though we acknowledge her belated apology for her recklessly dangerous conduct.”

This echoed the public reaction to her vetting which many described as underwhelming.

For Mr. Nkrumah, the MPs cited a lack of sincerity, among others, on issues concerning the collapse of a microfinance institution he was a major shareholder in.

“The Minister-designate for Information was not the least candid with the committee on the multiple infractions of the law leading to the Bank of Ghana's revocation of the license of Oval Microfinance – a company in which he was 83% majority shareholder.”

The NDC MPs also feel Dr. Owusu Afriyie Akoto fell short of standards of truthfulness in some of his submissions.

“The Minister-designate was particularly discourteous, downright condescending and offensively arrogant in his appearance at the committee which is not the kind of attitude expected of public servants,” their assessment of the vetting said.

Aside from the rejected nominations, the consideration of Kwaku Agyemang-Manu; Minister-designate for Health, Ursula Owusu-Ekuful, Minister-designate for Communications; John-Peter Amewu, Minister-designate for Railways; Kwesi Amoako-Arthur, Minister-designate for Roads and Highways and Godfred Yeboah Dame, the Minister-designate for Attorney-General and Justice was put on hold.

Citi News sources have said the decision was taken on Monday in agreement with the national leadership of the party.

Find below the NDC caucus’ assessment

Reject list

  1. 1) Hawa Koomson (MP)
    1. a) The Minister-designate for Fisheries and Aquaculture Development could not provide convincing grounds for the shooting incident during the Voter Registration Exercise in Kasoa on 20th July, 2020 even though we acknowledge her belated apology for her recklessly dangerous conduct.
    2. b) Furthermore, claims of an ongoing investigation by the Police did not come across as credible considering that there has been no update from the police more than 8 months after the unfortunate incident. Our checks also point to the fact that she has not provided any statement to the police as at yet.
    3. c) The nominee confirmed the identity of closed associates who have unleashed a reign of terror on helpless political opponents in the pursuit of their narrow political ends.
    4. d) The Minister-designate displayed an alarmingly abysmal lack of knowledge on the sector she was nominated for, making her unfit for the portfolio and therefore untenable to secure the approval of members of the NDC caucus.
  2. 2) Dr. Owusu Afriyie Akoto
    1. a) The Minister-designate for Food and Agriculture was untruthful under oath to the Committee on the circumstances leading to the abrogation of the Fruit and Export Terminal Contract of 2015 by GPHA on his express instructions as contained in a letter dated 11th January, 2021.
    2. b) He was untruthful under oath about his directive ordering GPHA to issue a license to Fruit Terminal Company Ltd and how his actions could lead to a US$50million judgement debt.
    3. c) The nominee was grossly insincere with the Appointments Committee on his special relationship with the Director of AMG Company Limited, Mr. Ernest Appiah and the latter's control of fertilizer contracts awarded by the Ministry.
    4. d) The Minister-designate was particularly discourteous, downright condescending and offensively arrogant in his appearance at the committee which is not the kind of attitude expected of public servants.

3) Kojo Oppong Nkrumah (MP)

  1. a) The Minister-designate for Information was not the least candid with the committee on the multiple infractions of the law leading to the Bank of Ghana's revocation of the license of Oval Microfinance – a company in which he was 83% majority shareholder.
  2. b) He failed to admit ethical liability for the related party lending between Oval Microfinance and West Brownstone which also belongs to him. He also denied outstanding obligations to Oval Microfinance despite the BoG's examination report establishing the contrary.
  3. c) He peddled untruths under oath about the circumstances leading to investigative journalist Manasseh Azure relocating to South Africa with the assistance of the Media Foundation for West Africa when the journalist faced threats to his life.
  4. d) The nominee was quite evasive on his association with MX24 TV which is owned and managed by his wife with other family members such as Kwabena Oppong Nkrumah serving as shareholder/Trustee for the parent company of MX24 TV known as Black Volta Publications Limited incorporated recently on the 4th of April, 2017 when the nominee was serving as Deputy Minister for Information.

Suspended nominees pending further investigations

1) Kwaku Agyemang-Manu (MP)

  1. a) The Minister-designate for Health is required to provide further and better particulars on the mysterious Frontiers Healthcare Services Limited US$150 airport antigen test.
  2. b) The nominee is required to clarify the procurement process, particularly as he had told the committee that the Presidential Task Force and the Ghana Health Service were the procurement entities – a claim which is later turning out to be false.
  3. c) We demand to know the real persons associated with Frontiers and the specific persons government related to.
  4. d) We need satisfactory answers on how the US$150 cost was arrived at.
  5. e) We seek further clarification on how the US$150 was shared amongst the parties to the contract and how much has been made so far.
  6. f) We shall be demanding answers on the tax obligations of Frontiers.
  7. g) We are concerned about the flagrant breach of our laws and the dangerous disregard for compliance standards in the execution of the contract. We insist on knowing those responsible for these violations.
  8. h) Another issue of concern is the nominee's apparent false claims under oath on the status of work at the La General Hospital. We intend to pursue further clarification on the matter.

---citinewsroom

View The Full Site