Research and Analysis Wikimedia: The Wiki Media Group under serious financial crisis and the ascension

The Boxer briefs, Tank top, Bra and Lungi (https://t.co/GBFePFqaVY) images added to the relevant articles in Wikipedia website.

Wikipedia, the self claim world's largest free encyclopedia's most of works & articles are produced & developed by the non-paid volunteer contributors around the world, for they are known as Wikipedian. But the Wikimedia Group may now under serious financial crisis. For lowly lowly reason wikipedia staff(s) are being aggressive to contributors & producing threat & warning to them that happens several times for few years.

The IT/ICT Experts and Media Consultants are said, definitely Wikipedia & their all collective entities are a giant initiatives, there are no doubt. Off course Wikipedia is not Facebook either Twitter is not Wikipedia. But every different entities are unique & respectable & giant in their own existence. For example, only any one news paper database among the top one thousand news paper around the world are much bigger & necessary than Wikipedia. There lots of valueable, important & respectful websites & database are existed in the world. There also many web existence whoever can claim them as encyclopedia. Even every famous news paper's can create an encyclopedia layer using their everyday's news, article and all text, image, video & audio contents instead of archiving database or in the same line of operation, just shifting contents mode into the encyclopedia layer. It's another different encyclopedia. Indeeds measuring the Wikipedia as self declared (largest) encyclopedia, so Facebook is world's largest book!

In this circumstance, the doubt & question raised that so Wikipedia Foundation are fallen into serious financial crisis and also they have not good Adviser whoever can rightly guide the Wikimedia Group and also highly qualified trainers Wikimedia Group need. Otherwise, is it not like just taking credentials of domain Internet by Mr. Mark Zuckerberg through his "Internet by Facebook" organization? Whoever monitor the cyber realities existance around the world?

If the encyclopedia is really useful greatly for human kind in consideration of others web existance too, so Wikimedia Group deserve the necessary support and cooperation indeed it's subject of their rights to be upgraded all sides including financial policy too.

The conversation conducted between the Wikipedian & an Editor of Wikipedia based on the uploaded images are copied bellow for the Modern Ghana readers;

==Stop==
I don't know what this sequence of edits was expected to achieve, but stop it now. If you want to spam low-quality photographs of yourself, get a blog. ‑ Iridescent 18:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

{adding} And you can knock off uploading copyright violations as well. Consider this a FINAL WARNING​ ‑ Iridescent 18:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

We do not want your selfies; this is an encyclopedia, not Facebook. And yes, this image was an absolutely blatant copyright violation; you patently did not take it yourself, as you claim. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. ‑ Iridescent 18:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

===OK===
OK but it's not fair policy for the articles Pictures you reverted had no relevant images but I Provided and most of my own works. The articles about the garments I uploaded Pictures but not about a person or the uploader. First try Use your sense and get clear conceptually. If you block just block and I understand that you someone block but it's not subject of warnings because Wikipedia has no right to power exercise. I hope you understand clearly. Even try to understand everything clearly, transparently & deeply. (Hatashe)

For the third time, Wikipedia is not a blogging or social media site, and neither Wikipedia nor Commons want your selfies unless they have encyclopedic value. All the articles you're spamming have multiple high quality and educational images to illustrate their topics already; those pages that are unillustrated like Tank top are intentionally unillustrated because they're disambiguation pages, not articles. And no, Wikipedia has no right to power exercise is just not true; if you're disrupting our site then any editor has every right to inform you that you'll be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue to be disruptive. ‑ Iridescent 19:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I hope you understood that I understood clearly. Now Again, consider your every angle dialogues & all relevant things you spokes, and finally my statement is same as I said in with Ok title. Wikipedia is voluntary work, they not pay to the contributors. Willingly most of users rich the encyclopedia and it's open to everyone can edit & include data. But if anything doesn't match with the Wikipedia criteria, just remove & block the system instead being aggressive to the volunteers. From where you studied or how the editor(s) select I don't know, but again finally Wikipedia need upgrade policy because time changed, Generation changed and Wikipedia has to adapt the behaviors of the edge. I think, whatever I discussed with you, totally unnecessary. I will happy, if you withdraw my email address from your list so that no spam email from Wikipedia may not come in my inbox. Thank for your cooperation. For the lowly reason when you produced threat it warning, we fear. Hatashe

Wikipedia's scope hasn't changed since its foundation; we didn't want images that didn't serve an encyclopedic purpose in 2001, and we don't want them now. I have no idea what you're talking about with regards to emails; I've never sent you an email in my life, and this thread is the only communication I've ever had with you. If you want to prevent Wikipedia editors and readers from using the Special:EmailUser/Hatashe function, just go here and un-check "Enable email from other users". ‑ Iridescent 19:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC).