Labour Court’s Decision Offers Hope to South Africans with Stale Criminal Records

Due to South Africa’s apartheid history, Darcy du Toit asserts that “no aspect of South African law is more vital than the prevention of unfair discrimination, particularly within the workplace.” The eradication of “unfair discrimination” from workplace practices was fundamental in crafting the new employment framework outlined by the Constitution and the Labour Relations Act, a framework now upheld by the Employment Equity Act.

Although race and gender have traditionally been the primary grounds for unfair discrimination claims, the courts are empowered to adjudicate on all types of discrimination prohibited by legislation. On 11 April 2024, the Labour Court declared criminal conviction an arbitrary ground of discrimination. Therefore, this case sheds light on the broader scope of discriminatory practices and underscores the judiciary’s mandate to address them comprehensively.

In the Connor v LexisNexis case, the Labour Court upheld the rights of individuals with criminal histories to seek employment without the burden of outdated convictions. This case sends a strong message about the importance of second chances and undermines harmful stereotypes that can lock people out of the workforce.

This issue hits close to home. A friend from university, Motshwene Motshwene, studied hard to become a psychologist. However, a youthful mistake – a shoplifting incident years ago – left him with a criminal record. He went to many places around Gauteng to try and solve the situation. Many years later, he was told that his case had been expunged under section 271B of the Criminal Procedure Act. Despite this, his past sins continued to haunt him.

Frustratingly, Motshwene’s Police Clearance Certificate would not reflect the expungement, leaving potential employers with a skewed picture. This, coupled with South Africa’s sluggish expungement process, effectively barred him from accessing crucial training opportunities and employment in his chosen field.

Motshwene’s story highlights the limitations of the current system. Even with expungement, outdated information can resurface, creating hurdles for those seeking to reintegrate into society. Now, the Connor v LexisNexis case offers a glimmer of hope.

Despite disclosing an expunged conviction from 2001, Elsworth O’Connor, the plaintiff in this case, was denied employment by LexisNexis after they discovered past offences of theft, fraud and defeating the course of justice. This was after the potential employer had extended a job offer by e-mail. The Labour Court supported his claim and ordered LexisNexis to honour their job offer, as the conviction was ruled an arbitrary ground of discrimination.

The court’s powerful statement underscored the core principle of the country’s justice system: “Our criminal justice system is premised on the idea that once the criminal has paid their debt to society, that person must be allowed back into society. To deny that person their right to freely participate in society with dignity, is to deny them their Constitutional rights as a person.”

Crucially, the court assessed the relevance of O’Connor’s criminal history to the requirements of his job as a Senior Data Discovery and Enrichment Expert. Considering that he would be working remotely from home in Komani and his past offences were unrelated to his present position, the court concluded that his criminal record should not preclude him from employment.

In the end, the court ruled that O’Connor’s prior criminal record was irrelevant to the demands of his position. Consequently, LexisNexis was mandated to hire the applicant within ten days of the court’s order.

The court’s ruling challenges the tendency to make blanket judgments, which can unfairly exclude people from the job market long after making amends. It also underscores the principles of fairness and non-discrimination in employment practices, particularly when past offences are irrelevant to the job's responsibilities.

South Africa’s high unemployment and legacy of inequality demand solutions that break down barriers. This decision sets a precedent, reminding employers that everyone deserves an opportunity to work if they meet the minimum job requirements, including qualifications, skills and experience. The case is a win for fairness and a step towards creating a more inclusive economy where individuals are judged on their present ability, not solely on their past mistakes.

Notwithstanding the positive outcome, Motshwene’s experience demonstrates the repercussions of an ineffective justice system in dealing with expungements of petty crimes. This system can still create more problems for job-seekers in a country where access to courts remains an exclusive privilege of the haves. This situation leads to victimisation and discrimination against those seeking reinstatement, particularly black youths from impoverished backgrounds.

In conclusion, the Labour Court’s decision in Connor v LexisNexis represents a significant step forward in addressing the systemic barriers individuals face with past criminal records. It serves as a beacon of hope for countless South Africans striving to rebuild their lives and contribute meaningfully to society, free from the shackles of past mistakes.