Urgent Appeal for an Urgent intervention to insure the immediate release of Ampon Tangnoppakul

Ampon Tangnoppakul

24 November 2011
Mr. Frank La Rue
Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression

Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland
Fax: +41 22 917 9006
Email: [email protected]
Re: Urgent Appeal for an Urgent intervention to insure the immediate release of Ampon Tangnoppakul

Dear Mr. Frank La Rue,
I am William Nicholas Gomes, a Bangladeshi Journalist and Human Rights Activist. I came to know from Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) about serious situations where the freedom of expression is highly violated.

I wish to express grave concern over the latest conviction and sentence of a person in Thailand for a crime of freedom of expression. On 23 November 2011, in Black Case No. 311/2554, Ampon Tangnoppakul (also known as 'Arkong'), a 61-year-old man, was sentenced to twenty years in prison for four alleged violations of Article 112 of the Thai Criminal Code and the 2007 Computer Crimes Act. Ampon's crime was to allegedly send four SMS messages to Somkiat Klongwattanasak, personal secretary of the former prime minister, Abhisit Vejjajiva. iLaw, a Thai legal NGO, reported that the four SMS messages were alleged by the authorities to contain vulgar language and to defame the Thai queen and to insult the honor of the monarchy. The precise content of the SMS messages has not been made public by the authorities and because repetition of alleged lesè majesté content itself constitutes a violation of the law, reporters are unable to report the precise content of the messages without then becoming subject to criminal prosecution themselves.

Compounding the injustice of this sentence, Ampon Tangnoppakul is suffering from laryngeal cancer and had been unable to access proper treatment during detention before and during his trial. There is no reason to believe that this will change now that he has been convicted, and, in fact, depending on what prison he is transferred to, there may be further concerns over his safety and well-being. As has been clear in the case of Daranee Charnchoengskilpakul, currently serving an eighteen-year sentence for alleged lesè majesté and who suffers from severe jaw disease, the authorities have no qualms about denying necessary medical treatment and violating the rights of political prisoners.

On 3 August 2010, a group of 15 police officers raided Ampon Tangnoppakul's house and arrested him. He was detained for 63 days of pre-charge detention before being granted bail on 4 October 2010. He was then formally charged by the prosecutor on 18 January 2011 with violations of Article 112 and the Computer Crimes Act, and has been incarcerated since then. The court refused bail on the basis of the gravity of his crime and the possibility of flight. His trial took place on 23 and 27-30 September 2011. From the beginning, Ampon maintained his innocence, noting that he did not know to send SMS messages and that the number that sent the message to Somkiat was not his number. The response of the prosecutor to this was to discount it, and note that as the IMEI number of the cell phone that sent the messages to Somkiat belonged to Ampon, then he was responsible.

In the years since the 19 September 2006 coup, and particularly in the last 2 years, there has been a vast expansion of the use of both Article 112 and the 2007 Computer Crimes Act. iLaw, a Thai legal rights NGO, noted that while Ampon was convicted of violations of Article 112 and the Computer Crimes Act of 2007, he was sentenced under Article 112, as it provides for harsher penalties. Since the passage of the Computer Crimes Act, the two have increasingly been used together to silence dissenting speech and intimidate activists and citizens. Article 112 of the Thai Criminal Code notes that, "Whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years." The relevant section of the Computer Crimes Act in this case is Section 14, Parts 2 and 3, which specify: "If any person commits any offense of the following acts shall be subject to imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than one hundred thousand baht or both: (2) that involves import to a computer system of false computer data in a manner than it likely to damage the country's security or cause a public panic; (3) that involves import to a computer system of any computer data related with an offence against the Kingdom's security under the Criminal Code." The definition of "computer system" is noted in Section 3 as "a piece of equipment or set of equipment units, whose function is integrated together, for which sets of instructions and working principles enable it or them to perform the duty of processing data automatically." The way in which this law is written, and as this case evidences, means that the Computer Crimes Act of 2007 may be used to target communication and speech using various forms of transmitting technology, not only computers per se. This conviction sends a clear message to people in Thailand: be careful, because your SMS messages may be scrutinized for criminal content and then you will be liable to a long prison sentence. The lack of a definition of "security" within the law means that there are wide opportunities for abuse as the authorities can define any dissident or otherwise objectionable content to violate the "security" of the nation.

In a statement released by the Human Rights Lawyers Association (HRLA) and the Ratsadornprasong Legal Institute (RLI) prior to yesterday's reading of the conviction, a letter written from Ampon's daughter to another detainee who was taking care of her father in jail noted:

"What we are most concerned about is our father's mental fatigue and despondency. Strength is almost gone already. Our requests for bail is always denied ... But the suffering of our family is eased because of you being by our father's side giving him strength...I know that we are not alone fighting for justice , there are many other people who also fight injustice. They fight for justice and freedom for the people who face injustice like us. We are all brothers and sisters, so do not get discouraged and keep on fighting for our father. We must be strong for people who are detained inside. We never thought that this would happen to us as it seem unreal for our family as Thais who greatly love and admire the monarchy. We are regretful that this institution is used for political purposes without them knowing it. It is painful for all us Thais because we love and respect the monarchy more than anything else. We have to fight against injustices in this country because this kind of case is used as a political tool against small people like us whom are treated like ants, termites and used as scapegoats."

I wish to express grave concern over this conviction and sentence of a person in Thailand for a crime of freedom of expression --. Ampon Tangnoppakul has been sentenced to the longest period in prison to date for alleged violations of Article 112 and the 2007 Computer Crimes Act. Particularly given the weak nature of the evidence deployed against him, and the extenuating circumstances of health and age, this case indicates that the Thai judiciary has become a place where justice is foreclosed and injustice flourishes. When murderers walk free, as they did in the case of the disappearance of Somchai Neelaphaijit, yet a 61-year-old man can be imprisoned for twenty years for allegedly sending four SMS messages with alleged anti-monarchy content, it is clear than human rights are in deep crisis in Thailand.

Mr. Frank La Rue, I call for your urgent intervention to insure the immediate release of Ampon Tangnoppakul and all others imprisoned for crimes of freedom of expression under Article 112 and the 2007 Computer Crimes Act. I will continue to closely follow all other cases of alleged violations of Article 112 and the 2007 Computer Crimes Act, and encourages all others concerned with human rights and justice in Thailand to do so as well.

I thank you for the attention you give to this letter.

Sincerely,
William Nicholas Gomes
Journalist & Human Rights Activist
80/ B Bramon Chiron, Saydabad,
Dhaka-1203, Bangladesh.
Cell: +88 019 7 444 0 666
E-mail:William [at] williamgomes.org,editorbd[at]gmail.com

Skype: William.gomes9
Face book: www.facebook.com/williamnicholasgomes
Twitter: twitter.com/williamgomes
Web site :www.williamgomes.org
Cc:
Advocates for Public Interest Law, South Korea
African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies (ACDHRS)

African Democracy Forum (ADF)
Algerian League for the Defense of Human Rights
AlKarama, Switzerland
Al-Khatim Adlan Centre for Enlightenment & Human Development, Sudan

Amnesty International
Arab Coalition for Darfur
Arab Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI)
Arab Program for Human Rights Activists
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)

Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC), Hong Kong, China

Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression, Egypt

Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR)
Brazilian Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans Association (ABGLT), Brazil

Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)
Cambodian Center for Human Rights, Cambodia
CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation
Collectif des Familles de Disparus en Algérie
Community Action Network (ICMICA-Malaysia), Malaysia

Committees for the Defense of Democracy Freedom and Human Rights, Syria

Conectas Direitos Humanos, Brazil
The Democracy Coalition Project (DCP), United States

East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project (EHAHRDP)

Egyptian Foundation for Advancement of the Childhood Condition

Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR)
Emirates Center for Human Rights, UAE
Euro Mediterranean Human Rights Network (EMHRN)
Franciscans International, Switzerland
Freedom Against Censorship Thailand (FACT), Thailand

Habi Center for Environmental Rights, Egypt
Hisham Mubarak Law Center, Egypt
Home for the Victims of Torture, Sri Lanka
Human Rights Organization in Syria (MAF)
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
Instance Marocaine des Droits Humains
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
International Service for Human Rights (ISHR)
Iraqi Human Rights Organization, Denmark
Joint Committee for Migrants in Korea, South Korea
Journalists for Human Rights (JHR), Sudan
Justice for Peace Foundation (JPF), Thailand
Korean House for International Solidarity, South Korea

Kurdish Committee for Human Rights-Rased, Syria
Kurdish organization for the defense of human rights and public freedoms in Syria (DAD)

Lawyers for Justice in Libya
LBH Masyarakat (Community Legal Aid Institute), Indonesia

Les Democrates Syriens
National Organization for Human Rights, Syria
Network for Glocal Activism, South Korea
Palestinian Human Rights Organization, Lebanon
SARANGBANG Group for Human Rights, South Korea
Shabab: Youth Center for Cultural Change, Sudan
Sisters Arab Forum for Human Rights (SAF), Yemen
Sudan Social Development Organization (SUDO)
The Arab Organization for Human Rights, Syria
The May 18 Memorial Foundation, South Korea
MINBYUN - Lawyers for a Democratic Society, South Korea

Tunisian League for the Defense of Human Rights
West Africa Human Rights Defenders Network (WAHRDN)

Yemeni Center for Transitional Justice
Yemeni Organization for Defending Rights and Democratic Freedoms

World Organization Against Torture (OMCT)