As soon as I heard that the Minister of Communications had directed the National Communications Authority (NCA) to stop the practice whereby the TELCOS “expire” the credit of their customers, if the duration for which the credits were bought had lapsed, I realised that the Minister had a fight on her hands.
For this was easy pickings the TELCOS were making out of a relatively passive populace. Passive populace? Yes: where is our WHICH organization? Where is our Federal Communications Authority that is prepared to use the hammer against TELCOS that prove by their deeds that
they are among the most unscrupulous business organisations in the world today?
Almost everything the people of the world do depend on efficient communications. Voiced conversations, the transmission of crucial data, everything, depend on fast, efficient work by the TELCOS.
Now, there is enough business in the communications area to profit everyone in it, even if fair competition occurs in it. But don't want that – especially in countries with “weak” institutions, which have been brainwashed to believe that they can only escape the poverty trap if they allow their wealth to be filched abroad at a fraction of its real value. Countries that would much rather be satisfied with alleged “favours” than insist on fair practices for their citizen.
Where, in the “developing” world, can the citizen go to bed happy that his government is protecting his back against companies bent on excessive profiteering?
Woaa look! – how can it be fair for a TELCO to decree that if you buy a “bundle” of credit or usage from a TELCO, you should specify whether it is for 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days or Two Million Years? Can any of us predict the future?
How can one foresee that although one's expectation is that one would be able to use one's credit purchase for a period of one month, one could be carted off to hospital only 2 days after purchasing the 30-day credit? Why should one come back from hospital after 31 days have elapsed, only to find that one cannot make a telephone call, or send an SMS, and most important of all, go on the Internet to find out what's been going on whilst one has been in hospital?
This heartless killing of credit by the TELCOS not only causes severe personal distress to customers every day, but should be UNLAWFUL in all but name.
You are not allowed to use a service that you have paid for. Is that natural justice? What caused the arbitrary “expiration”? Was the unused credit interfering with the work of the TELCOS? If so, how? What, in fact, IS the basis of the “expiration”?
It is because such ruthless exploitation is possible that, when TELCOS apply for licenses from governments to “print” money for themselves, governments insist on REGULATING the TELCOS. But so smart are the TELCOS that they outwit governments every time.
In Ghana, for instance, they have come together to form a “Chamber of Communications”. Ostensibly, their objective is to exchange ideas on how to serve the public better!
But that's phooey! Their actual objective is to form a MONOPOLY and disguise it as an “association of friendly competitors”! In effect, the Chamber is a cartel, and we in Ghana know only too well what cartels do.
In case you are among those who do not know our history, let me inform you that it was a cartel, the “Association of West African Merchants” (AWAM) whose unfair practices led to the agitation for independence amongst our populace.
Their cheating caused the strikes in 1948 that took our demand for self-government from the pages of newspapers into the looting of foreign-owned shops.
What the AWAM group was doing was to exchange information on the cost of cloth, cement, drinks and other imports and harmonise them in all their shops.
If you wanted to buy a piece of cloth and you went to a UAC outlet to buy it, it would cost the same as what you would find at UTC, Busi and Stevenson, or any other foreign trader.
At the same time, if you sold a bag of cocoa, a bag of kola-nuts, or a log of timber to a company that belonged to the AWAM group, each company would pay you precisely the same price as any other company!
This was such a blatant abuse of the principles of free trade that when Nii Kobina Boney (Osu Alata Mantse) called for a boycott of goods traded by AWAM merchants, it caught on like wild fire. The boycott led to massive looting. And the British brought in troops to quell the “riots”. And one thing led to another to ignite our independence movement. It took only nine years after the looting for us to gain our independence.
But today, it appears we are back to Square One. The stranglehold which the TELCOS hold over our lives is as strong as that practiced by AWAM 70 years ago!
Well, the Minister of Communications has gleaned what's happening and wants to rescue her fellow-citizens from it.
Unfortunately, she has widened the net of unfairness too much, the deduction of a tax that was already in existence should be a different matter.
The TELCOS know that the initial imposition of that tax did not arouse much opposition. So, in their reaction to the Minister's recent directive to the NCA, they focused entirely on that tax, and ignored what she said about the “expiry” of credit!
The Minister would, therefore, be well-advised to ignore the alleged “olive branch” proffered by the TELCOS, as regards the tax. For strong pressure will be put on her to abandon her attempt to protect her fellow-citizens from the unused credit expiry practice.
They are cleverly gaming her by “giving way” to demands that are really in the domain of the Ghana Revenue Authority. And whilst she is congratulating herself on having “won” that particular battle, they will cleverly have gotten her to forget the excellent case she has made that directs the NCA, to quash the “expiry” of unused credit!
We shall watch closely to see whether Ursula will be naïve enough to allow herself to be so easily gamed by them!
By Cameron Duodu
Disclaimer: "The views/contents expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not neccessarily reflect those of Modern Ghana. Modern Ghana will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article."
Reproduction is authorised provided the author's permission is granted.