Can’t Nana Akufo-Addo Genuinely Get Credit For Anything As President?
For any typical day, if the incessant fault-finding mission is not directed aimlessly at the proposed National Cathedral, the Free SHS, or the sustained war on illegal mining, definitely the naysayers will still find something so trifling to criticize Nana Akufo-Addo while ignoring his immense strengths as president. For example, it could be something as shallow as his “body language” when he hosted Germany’s Angela Merkel at the Jubilee House to talk about big ideas for the country.
Simply stated, in the petty bubble of never-see-anything-good pack of Ghanaians spearheaded by the hyper-partisan main opposition party, whose firm resolve is to ensure that at the end of his term of presidency, Nana Addo will not get the chance to boast of any policy of consequential national implications. So deny this president the genuine credit due him; suffice to say, let’s muddy the water upstream and quickly come downstream; look straight in the eyes of all Ghanaians and put the blame on Nana Akufo-Addo for causing the mess.
Obviously many of these deniers, including countless hangers-on of the largest political group are so disappointed and envious that their then ruling NDC party had crumbled electorally under the heavy weight of their perceived incompetence and unprecedented corrupt practices. Evidently, the preceding experiences have numbed these obstructionists’ practical responses and sociopolitical pathos to the basic realities of how to play the role as viable and selfless opposition in representative democracy.
Since assuming the cash-strapped and corrupt-infested Ghana’s economy in January 2017, President Akufo-Addo has undertaken significant reforms. Some of his rebuilding efforts are not so much in plain sight but others are more visible and they include innovative policies guaranteeing that the poor and the rich kids have free access to basic education in Ghana; the creation of Special Prosecutor, Ghana Beyond Aid concept, Planting for Food and Jobs, the proposed Cargo Tracking Notes System (CTN), the crash reconstruction project regarding railroads system, and many more.
Yet what do the ordinary Ghanaians see and hear every day from the unrelenting fault-finders of President Akufo-Addo? The wide-ranging government policies notwithstanding, the self-serving skeptics and the cynics, as well as a sizable bunch of uninformed backseat media talking heads keep peddling and echoing the pessimistic narrative, making it seem like the president’s all-embracing policies are subpar and hence nothing to celebrate about.
Partisanship and politics of non-compromise seriously undercut truth, fairness, and a country’s development potentials. Politics of “my way or no way” not only stifles societal growth but also it tends to discourage true patriots from seeking public office. Functional democracy is predicated on truth; and, truth as we know it is neutral or “tribal-less.” Potentially, all humans have capabilities to understand the contours of truth because it is universal. So, as soon as an individual or a group of people start viewing themselves as repository of all knowledge or truth, it has countervailing effect or implicit assumption that other people are incapable of deconstructing the truth. For many NDC adherents, Nana Akufo-Addo presidency is an aberration; thus, whatever it takes to obstruct him, so be it.
Understandably, in multiparty political system strong but civil expression of policy differences and debates are commonplace in that they form intrinsic part of the culture. However, in the situation in which one or more people deliberately deny or pervert a public figure’s true story in the desperate bid to promote one’s own, makes politics looks dirty and insensitive, although in its unadulterated state it can be a noble avenue for the public good.
President Akufo-Addo and his ruling NPP’s kind of politics and ideology may not be what one’s political or economic values are; but these honest differences do not license anyone to distort the genuine record of less-than-two-year-old government of Nana Addo just to win cheap political points. Again, it is one thing to offer constructive critiques and highlight on one’s divergent policy positions, but it is entirely another thing to find faults constantly with the neighbor’s initiatives for the sake of it without providing any creative solutions.
If the widespread but cynical storyline is that the president’s landmark Free SHS education policy is not living up to expectations, what is the alternative courses of action the critics suggest for improvement besides moving from one radio station to another to rehash the tired-old mantra that “You see, l told you so it’s not going to work unless the Free SHS is progressively implemented.” The question to the critics is: What is the guarantee that “progressively implementing” (whatever that means) a given national policy will make it incident-free or successful?
As usual, let the disparagers keep denying the existence of the president’s ambitious programs put in place so far to help make Ghana better than he came to meet in office. Undoubtedly, President Akufo-Addo will be recorded in history as one of the few modern leaders who rose above politics of pettiness and mediocrity in the face of unimaginative and prepackage opposition forces.
His authentic love and patriotism for Ghana hardly need emphasis. It is not for any trivial reason that the visiting German Chancellor Merkel acknowledged President Addo’s reformist policies in a press briefing in Accra, informing her host and Ghanaians alike that Germany is planning of establishing Volkswagen assembly factory in the country. This speaks a lot to the recognition and the current government’s achievements under Nana Addo Danquah, because Germany as an advanced economy and the richest nation in Europe knows a growing economy when it sees one. Do I need to belabor this point?
Bernard Asubonteng is a US-based writer.
Disclaimer: "The views/contents expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not neccessarily reflect those of Modern Ghana. Modern Ghana will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article."
Reproduction is authorised provided the author's permission is granted.