Is There A Difference Between The Leadership Qualities Of Vice President Bawumia And That Of Former President Mahama?

The latest spat between former President John Dramani Mahama, and Ghana's current vice-president, Alhaji Mahammudu Bawumia, illustrates perfectly the nature of the dog-eat-dog society (controlled by a ruthless and self-seeking vampire-elite), which has evolved in our country since the overthrow of President Nkrumah in 1966.

Whiles the vast majority of ordinary people in Ghana are content to own: one or two houses at the most; earn enough to be able to save to secure their individual futures and those of their nuclear families; be able to attend funerals and other ceremonies marking rites of passage in our traditional cultures and make meaningful monetary donations at those selfsame public functions, the John Mahamas and Alhaji Bawumias represent a wealthy and greedy vampire-elite that seeks to permanently control our system so that they can turn their wealth-creation-dreams of becoming U.S.dollar billionaires (owning hundreds of houses each, ditto expensive vehicles, private jet planes, etc., etc.) into reality at the expense of ordinary Ghanaians and their nation.

Who has ever heard any of the philistines from the political parties that take turns to govern our country talking about economic growth that does not damage the natural environment and does not allow unethical businesses to egregiously exploit workers, I ask?

Yes, today we all accept that the private-sector is the main engine of growth for our national economy, but is it not abominable that for the sake of a mere U.S. 500 million grant from the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation, those geniuses are handing over a state monopoly, the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG), to a private sector company for decades, on terms and conditions enabling it to reap where it has not sown? Typical.

Above all, if they did any original thinking would they not have approached Japan for a long-term (30-years at a maximum 2 percent interest) instead of paying 19 percent interest on euro bonds to pay off sundry dubious energy sector debts?

Could any other Ghanaian - who does creative thinking - in Bawumia's position who went to China with a new sustainable development model, not have sought a mutually beneficial partnership between Ghana and China that would have made it possible to empower our nation to build a gold refinery, and enable the Precious Minerals Marketing Company Limited (PMMC) to turn Ghana into a global hub for the production and sale of credit-card-sized gold bars and gold coins embossed with Adinkra signs, as well as produce traditional Ghanaian-style gold jewelry for sale to Chinese citizens travelling to Ghana to purchase same? Ebeeii.

Would that not have led to Ghana becoming a lucrative outbound tourism market for tens of millions of tourists from China and other parts of Asia travelling to Ghana regularly annually - earning scores of Ghanaian SME entrepreneurs across our country billions of dollars that remain here and create jobs galore for young Ghanaians?

So what sense was there in Bawumia giving out our bauxite deposits to Chinese mining companies: and giving them carte blanche to come and destroy forests in Ghana to mine sodden bauxite here, I ask?

The vested interests that control the Ghanaian elites that both Bawumia and Mahama represent, and which operate from the shadows, are a clear and present danger to Mother Ghana - which is why the more responsible sections of the Ghanaian media must closely monitor them and the political parties their lobbyists belong to at all material times.

Finally, Vice President Bawumia says former President John Mahama is clueless, and that most of the leadership of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) seldom read. The question is: If Vice President Bawumia doesn't read relevant content that will enable him move out of the shadow of conventional economic thinking, is there any real difference between him and former President John Dramani Mahama?

For the benefit of all the members of Ghana's political class we are republishing a past blog post entitled: "Suggested Reading For Dr. Bawumia & Co". Perhaps reading it will enable them to finally transform Ghana into a prosperous society. Alas, as things currently stand, there is no real difference between the leadership qualities of former President Mahama, and those of Vice President Bawumia. Full stop.

Please read on:
"Sunday, 11 September 2016
Suggested Reading For Dr. Bawumia & Co Recently, it was reported in sections of the Ghanaian media that Dr. Mahamadu Bawumia, the running mate of the New Patriotic Party's (NPP) presidential candidate, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, had stated that members of the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) seldom read.

The question there is: How many Ghanaians - including even the leading lights of the NPP - ever bother to read? One presumes that Bawumia himself is widely read - and also continues to read regularly. At least one does hope so. Ours would definitely be a better society, if most Ghanaians - particularly the younger generations - read regularly.

Good Ghanaian writers of all ages would then have the incentive to write yet more books, and thrive financially to boot, too.

At any rate, if Bawumia wants an NPP regime to be able to successfully transform the enterprise Ghana from a heavily-geared financial basket-case into a prosperous one, then to free himself from the prison of his negative experience as a career central banker, this blog humbly recommends that he downloads and reads as many of the publications by Positive Money that he possibly can. He will find that that will benefit him hugely.

For this blog's many readers, who might also be keen to do so too, they are available at: http://www.positivemoney.org .

They will be fascinated by the possibilities that the creation of sovereign money in transparent and accountable fashion, to spend in Ghana's real economy, holds for our country's hapless citizens who now have to struggle to survive daily, despite decades of never-ending sacrifices for the betterment of their nation - a desired outcome,

which, alas, has failed to materialise: whiles Ghana's vampire-elites have seen their net worth skyrocketing into the stratosphere, in inverse proportion to the ever-deepening woes of the bottom-of-the-pyramid-masses. But I digress.

That Dr. Bawumia has caught the imagination of many of Ghana's educated urban middle-class elites, is not in doubt. However, for a tiny minority of Ghanaians, for whom lateral thinking comes naturally, it is extraordinary that Dr. Bawumia - on the surface a decent-enough gentleman who is undoubtedly highly-intelligent too - should have such a hold on a supposedly-discerning Ghanaian demographic.

The question is: What earth-shattering radical ideas does Dr. Bawumia have to transform a corruption-riddled society, lumbered with a mostly unproductive and not very honest working population (with a public-sector full of white-collar thieves having nearly 70% of total tax revenues lavished on them ironically - although they are forever embarking on strike action), into an economically well-managed and politically well-governed nation that is prosperous?

More to the point: How will the economic management team he will lead do so within the stipulated maximum two-term tenure totalling eight years that Ghana's presidents are limited to by the Constitution - but which aren't even guaranteed in what is a democracy in which free and fair elections are held every four years?

And if even eight years aren't enough for any regime to transform Ghana into a prosperous society, what hope is there that such a transformation can ever be achieved in a country groaning under the yoke of a national debt of mammoth proportions, by an NPP regime in which Bawumia serves as vice president: in what will after all be a relatively short-spanned 4-year tenure - which all Ghanaian presidents are elected initially to serve for?

Indeed, some of us can foresee the possibility of a very bleak future for a Ghana under an NPP regime, which will excel in propaganda blame-game-politricks and the self-serving politics-of-equalisation: in which excuse after excuse will be deployed to explain away every failure by the regime in power to make significant progress in fulfilling its many empty election campaign promises, as the nation sinks further into the abyss - whiles many of those in power and their cronies, as well as their extended family clan favourites, grow super-rich cunningly ripping-off Mother Ghana by stealth through special-purpose offshore legal fronts set up for precisely that purpose.

Intelligent though Bawumia is, he is nonetheless a typical Ghanaian intellectual - a breed of the species amongst whose many shortcomings include: earning academic qualifications mostly by rote-learning; seldom doing any original and creative thinking; and hardly ever being able to innovate to introduce better ways of doing things in the real world.

So why the fascination with him amongst educated Ghanaians - and why should he have such a hold on so many Ghanaians? Hmm, Ghana - eyeasem o. Do such Ghanaians not understand the implications of electing politicians who aren't willing to voluntarily publish their own assets, and those of their spouses, in a country blighted by endemic high-level corruption?

When has Bawumia, who never ceases to point out examples of high-level corruption in the present administration, ever offered to publicly publish his assets and those of his wife Samira - and committed to doing so again immediately after leaving office? Hmm, Oman Ghana - eyeasem serbeh o: asem kesie ebeba debi ankasa.

Would doing so not show Ghanaians that he has good intentions in seeking power - and is unlikely to amass wealth illegally if elected as Ghana's vice president?

And do Ghanaians also ever contemplate the inherent dangers in handing power to opaque political parties - which are beholden to the very vested interests that profit from the high-level corruption slowly bleeding Mother Ghana to death - which refuse to publicly publish all the sources of their election campaign funds: and list the amounts donated by each 'donor' (whom they must also identify to the world)?

What a strange lot we are. No wonder our educated urban elites have succeeded in turning Nkrumah's Ghana into a banana republic - in which millions worship at the alter of the Cult-of-the-mediocre. Pity.

Some of us would take the Dr. Mahamadu Bawumias in our midst far more seriously if at least they had track records of radical thinking that have impacted the real economy positively, to show the world. In that regard, perhaps Bawumia could be Ghana's saviour, if he were an advocate for monetary reform - and championed its cause here.

However, that he is apparently proud of his legacy as a central banker, speaks volumes about his professional world-view as a banker: He is as welded to the damaging, prevailing monetary policy orthodoxy (championed by central bankers around the globe) as the rest of them are, alas. To therefore think that he is the economic Messiah for Ghana, is pretty daft, unfortunately, if truth be told.

Be that as it may, for those in Ghana who like us are also clueless when it comes to the subject of the art and science of economics, this blog is making available information below, on the subject of monetary reform (that would definitely help transform the Ghanaian economy positively if adopted here), from the Positive Money movement's website.

We do hope that somehow, as more educated Ghanaians get to learn about what the Positive Money movement stands for, it will lead to the formation of local chapters of the International Movement for Monetary Reform (IMMR) in Ghana too.

Finally, considering the fact he will lead the economic management team if the presidential candidate of the NPP were to win this December's presidential election, some of us are of the considered view that publications by Positive Money on the subject of monetary reform, really ought to be required reading for all educated young Ghanaians - particularly the NPP's Dr. Mahammudu Bawumia.

Please read on:
"The International Movement for Monetary Reform
Statement of purpose
Changing the way money is created to serve society
We are a coalition of organisations and people from across the world, campaigning to change the way money is created.

This Statement of purpose describes what the IMMR does, and also doesn’t do.

The Problem
The IMMR believes that our money system has mutated over the years in response to technology, regulation, de-regulation, and globalisation. The result is an unfair system which does not work in the public interest.

The IMMR has identified the following problems with the current money system:

* Unsustainable indebtedness: Because all money is issued as credit, debt increases at the same rate as the money supply.

* Financial instability: Money creation is pro-cyclical – too much is created in a boom, and too little in a recession, causing the pronounced boom and bust cycle.

* Anti-democratic: Because the government relies on commercial banks to create money, the government has to borrow more, and we have to pay higher taxes.

* Perpetual expansion: In order to service large amounts of debt the economy has to grow, even when markets are saturated and resources depleted.

* Unbalanced and unproductive economy: Banks choose where new money is spent on the basis of their own profits rather than the needs of the economy.

* Inequality and the concentration of wealth: Interest payments on the entire money supply suck wealth out of the economy in to the banks.

* Bank runs, subsidies and bailouts: The banking system is unstable and unprofitable without government subsidies and guarantees.

* Unfair, monopolistic and anti-competitive: The right to create money gives banks an unfair and damaging advantage over all other parts of the economy.

The IMMR believes that the money system is not fit-for-purpose and needs updating. A well-functioning money system will provide more stable economies, which will benefit everybody.

Our Goal
The IMMR is supportive of ideas and policies which move towards our end goal. We are not dogmatic about our proposals or the way they are implemented and the detail will vary from country to country. We do believe that our end goal can only be reached when these three things have been achieved:

New money to be spent in to the economy by the Government.

A transparent and independent process for the creation of new money, which regulates the money supply according to the needs of the economy.

Stop the banks creating new money when they make loans (full-reserve banking).

The IMMR is
IMMR is a collaboration of not-for-profit organisations set up to campaign to reform the money system, both nationally, and internationally.

IMMR believes that private banks should not be able to create new money when they make loans. This is an extraordinary privilege which gives the financial sector an unfair and damaging advantage over other businesses. Banks should be restricted to providing current accounts, payment services, lending, and investing money on behalf of their savers.

This will lead to a reduction in personal and Government debt, and will help to prevent another financial crisis occurring.

The IMMR maintains a very clear and specific aim, namely to change the way the money system works.

The IMMR is not
The IMMR does not subscribe to any conspiracy theories about the money system.

The IMMR does not act on the behalf of any particular lobby or interest group.

The IMMR is not a political organisation. We don’t campaign for either a bigger or a smaller role for government. We campaign for changes to the money system which would be to the benefit of all political parties.

The IMMR is not against privately owned banks. Privately-owned banks have an important function in providing payment services, a secure place for our money, investment opportunities, and to lend us money.

The IMMR is not against bankers. Most people who work in banks do not understand the money system and its effects, and are simply trying to provide a service for customers and earn a living. Undoubtedly some bankers have abused their power, but this is not the root cause of our financial crisis; the root cause is our current money system.

The IMMR is not against lending, or charging interest on loans where an investor is lending their money to somebody else.

The IMMR does not believe that regulation alone can solve the problems with banking or the money system. Regulation has been shown to be ineffective, and easily reversed, but furthermore it does not alter the root causes of the problem. What is needed is legislative change.

The IMMR is not a campaign for general financial reform, alternative economics or complementary currencies. While there are many other reforms that also need to take place, the IMMR has a specific and narrow purpose – to change the national money systems in order to create fairer and more stable economies.

The IMMR does not support the use of illegal or violent means to bring about change. We campaign for the money system to be changed with minimal social and economic upheaval."

End of culled content from the Positive Money website.