INDUSTRIALISATION: THE FRENCH WAY

The world is a dangerous world where interest groups have their hands on everything. Everywhere one turns towards they dominate and have copious influence. They purport to have control over all other important business or avenues that keep the world running. This is because they have money and power to buy those that could be of help to a particular country that needs to industrialise in no time. When this becomes the case, a country could easily be frustrated in its attempts to make a break through in success regarding industrialisation. It has happened to many countries that eventually felt themselves so cornered such that they were forced to hang on in the middle of two opposing powerful ideologies that eventually cost them their integrity and the support they could secure from other friendly nations. It is because of this that I have resolved to suggest the “French Way,” an unique procedure where nations could become industrialise in no time without causing too much conflict or enmity among its friends abroad and those they have respect for in their vicinity.

The aim of this article is to suggest an alternative method of the agreement approach we have discussed earlier, and to allow nations become industrialise even if they are frustrated by certain interest groups that fear that Africans becoming develop nations will hurt their industries and sources of revenue in the future. With the French way, nations' effort to divert attention or cause disruption to a particular nation's effort to industrialise in no time would be futile. The former would find itself in a sad situation where they shall be forced to endure shame and eventually give up their bad malpractices in the end. Those nations that would utilise the French procedure will surely succeed in their attempt to industrialise and bring up their country and its people from poverty.

The French Method: What is it?
The French way is an industrial approach to utilise individual geniuses in a particular country in question and also those from abroad in general to help industrialise and boost its fragile economy. The country knows the predicament it is going through in its attempts to industrialise. That is, interest groups frustration they engineer in order to block their access to money and different contacts in a sovereign country that could assist them. Therefore, this particular country offers high ransom or remuneration to individual industrialists and geniuses abroad and at home that are willing to offer technology and also to lead them to contact persons abroad in the Arab world and the Western world. Since there is no direct offence regarding contact with any specific government from the East or West, the country can conduct itself in a low profile manner while industrialisation will be going on in a progressive manner.

1. Capital Transfer
One of the activities, which the French approach could do, is to help countries to get access to capital from abroad through private means. The capital may be in the hands of individuals who are rich and possess influence in the world. They could be anonymous Kings and Princes elsewhere in the world that may like to commence an industrial venture with this particular country. They could be industrialists and football stars that would like to invest in certain countries. This means contact should be made in an appropriate manner which these individuals themselves prefer to be contacted. It must be mentioned that private capital is a very important asset that had built many countries in the world, including some of these famous countries that consider themselves as rich and prosperous.

2. Technology Transfer
The urge to industrialise and to take a country and its citizens from poverty means that some technology transfer is required. And on this issue, the French way is the best method to lure many people with best brains to come and work in a particular country. There are many people that are willing to travel to the country in question in order to work for the huge sums of money. There are some that want to stay away but may be willing to send technology information through e-mail or telephone to the country. Yet still there may be some engineers and industrialists that would like to pull all its industries and assets into a particular country. The nation in question should then do its best to see to it that they reward these serious individuals that want to come and live in its country. It is true that nowadays a lot of information can be secured on the internets but this is not the same as employing 5 or 6 geniuses in a specific area where the nation in particular wants to be strong in their attempts to progress in industrialisation.

3. Spying Operation
It is possible that some may like to engage in industrial spying or espionage to obtain certain information. Though this approach is not necessary because of the free world we live in, there is nothing wrong if it is conducted in an appropriate manner. I think this is very common in the area of war than industrial venture. But as mentioned elsewhere, the French people adopted this principle when they saw that they were being frustrated and that they could not persuade the British to help transfer technology in a peaceful way to their country.

4. Stealing Operation
The stealing method is legitimate if one uses his senses to steal, like the for example, the ears, eyes, feeling with hands, and obtaining permission to take pictures or videos in order to transport to one's country. It is approach that helped many countries in Europe and later to be adopted by the Japanese and the Chinese in their industrialisation pursuits. Nowadays because of the information technology that is abundant, there may be no need to use these methods as information could be retrieved direct from the Internet.

5. Observation Operation
The observation method is legitimate and can be used by all countries' citizens irrespective of where one finds himself. As a tourist, an individual could gather materials with the intention of using them for materials with his research work or for documentation.

But while we have suggested the French way as capable of initiating tremendous way forward and attaining progress in this venture, one could still combine other methods to supplement this important one.

6. Eclectic Procedure
This is the approach where the individual countries decide to apply all methods they can get access to in order to help them become industrialised. A nation with its charismatic leader motivates its citizens both at home and abroad to become serious in their attempts to industrialise. It entails superb organisation and the adoption of teamwork to help them get the right people at different areas that they intend to develop. Certain things should be in place first before the eclectic method could be successful. There should be open declaration and the will to develop firstly, the road systems to conform to the international standard, and secondly, the railway system should be modernised. The housing systems should be given a boost to get those workers who would be employing in these sectors to have housing at their disposal. They could invest by buying these houses that are being completed while the railways and roads are being embarked upon. Monumental apartment buildings for the masses are better than the selfish self-contained houses, which consume land and space.

7. The Chinese and Japanese Approach
Here modern films from these two countries above with regards to how they managed to develop faster should be obtained and be shown on the national TV to motivate people to become aware of how people like them could succeed. Ministers should be capable of coming on the TV and after the films have been shown, should be able to discuss and analyse the content.

8. Talented Men Approach
The method is the one where government of countries calls the talented among them to a specific college, which has been founded to manage the industrial plan in order to give impetus. Here a college of geniuses are put together as the engine room where advises are sought and disseminated into the development sites. A nation that adopts this method is capable of mustering all talented people in every field where development would be going on. They may not need people from abroad as these talented individuals would be able to research and find answers from their colleagues in abroad.

Conclusion
Different articles have been published to show that human beings are the same and that the myths and magical stories that had been used to surround others were not true. The descendants of African Albinos, the twin brothers of present-day Africans and African Americans only had a minor change in their DNA that concerns the hair and certain minor observable things in them that could not make them different from you. These things did not make them clever as they purport to say using bigger brain theory. These were used as manipulation in order to dominate you, for they possess 100% blood of Africans and all human gene is 99% the same. The rest, that is, 1-% is only minor that cannot present a major difference. If others could do it, then you also can do it. What a nation that intends to industrialise must do is to use superb organisation to accomplish certain things/structures such good roads, railways, housing, and good hospitals. Once these have been accomplished, the private individuals who want money and wealth would take care of the rest. Motivation is therefore needed in order to ensure that people do things for themselves and their country.

Bibliography
Cohen, M. R. & Nagel, E. (1949). An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited.

Close, F. (1989). The quark structure of matter. In The New Physics. Pp. 396-424. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Darwin, C. (1889). On the Origin of Species… (Authorised edition from English ed. II); New York.

Davies, P. (Ed.) (1989). The New Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davies, P. (1989). The new physics: a synthesis. In The New Physics. Pp. 1-33. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Epstein, L. C. (1992). Relativity Visualized. San Francisco: Insight Press.

Ford, J. (1989). What is chaos, that we should be mindful of it? In The New Physics. Pp. 348-371. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gay, P. (Ed.) (1973). The Enlightenment. A Comprehensive Anthology. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Garraty, J., & Gay, P. (Eds.) (1972). The Columbia History of the World. New York: Harper & Row.

Georgi, H. M. (1989). Grand unified theories. In The New Physics. Pp. 425-445. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guerlac, H. (1961). Lavoisier—the Crucial Year. Ithaca, New York.

Guth, A. & Steinhardt, P. (1989). The inflationary universe. In The New Physics. Pp. 34-60. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawking, S. (1989). The edge of spacetime. In The New Physics. Pp. 61-69. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawking, S. (2001). The Universe in a Nutshell. The Inspiring Sequel to A Brief History of Time. London: Transworld Publishers.

Heath, T. L. (1897). The Works of Archimedes. Cambridge: University Press.

Heath, T. L. (1908). The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements Translated from the Text of Heiberg with Introduction and Commentary. 2 Ed. Cambridge: University Press.

Heath, T. L (1949). Mathematics in Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hutchins, R. M. (Ed.) (1952). Newton & Huygens 34. Great Books of the Western World. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

Isham, C. (1989). Quantum gravity. In The New Physics. Pp. 70-93. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jönsson, A-M. (2007). “Ett öppet krig—per correspondens,”Forskning & Framsteg. Nr 1, Jan-Feb, pp. 22-25.

Knight, P. (1989). Quantum optics. In The New Physics. Pp. 289-315. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. 2nd Edition. The International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol2., No. 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lave, L. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leggert, A. (1989). Low temperature physics, superconductivity and superfluidity. In The New Physics. Pp. 268-287. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, E. J. (1991).The Big Bang Never Happened. A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Lloyd, E. (1980). Handbook of Applicable Mathematics Vol. II Probability. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Longair, M. (1989). The new astrophysics. In The New Physics. Pp. 94-208. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lorentz, H. A. (1931). Lectures on Theoretical Physics. Delivered at the University of Leiden. Vol. III Transl. by L. Silberstein & Trivelli. London: Macmillan and Co., LTD.

Maddox, J. (1998). What Remains to be Discovered. London: Macmillan.

Mach, E. (1976). Knowledge and Error. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Maxwell, J. C. (1877ed). Matter and Motion. London.

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Newton, I. (1999). The Principia. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Transl. By Cohen, Bernard & Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Nicolis, G. (1989). Physics of far-from-equilibrium systems and self-organisation. In The New Physics. Pp. 316-347. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.