A Call for Accountability: A Response to Alexander Afenyo-Markin’s Proposals

Alexander Afenyo-Markin’s recent revival of the controversial plan to construct a new parliamentary chamber has reignited public frustration over misplaced priorities in governance. Coupled with his alleged suggestion of a special hospital for parliamentarians, these proposals reflect a troubling disconnect from the pressing needs of ordinary Ghanaians. At a time when the nation faces significant economic challenges, such ideas are not only tone-deaf but also emblematic of a broader failure of leadership.

A Legacy of Wasted Opportunities
Afenyo-Markin and his party, the New Patriotic Party (NPP), had eight years in power to address Ghana’s developmental challenges. Yet, their tenure is marked by a glaring lack of tangible progress. From unfulfilled promises of industrialization to the mismanagement of public funds, the NPP’s track record leaves much to be desired. As the late Kofi Annan once said, “Leadership is not about speeches or promises; it is about action and results.” Unfortunately, the results of the past eight years speak volumes.

Instead of focusing on critical sectors such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, resources were squandered on projects that yielded little benefit to the average Ghanaian. The controversial National Cathedral project, for instance, became a symbol of misplaced priorities, diverting funds that could have been used to improve hospitals, schools, and roads.

Misplaced Priorities in Governance

The proposal for a new parliamentary chamber is a stark reminder of the disconnect between political elites and the citizens they serve. Ghana’s current parliamentary chamber is functional and adequate for legislative purposes. Investing millions of cedis in a new chamber, while schools lack basic facilities and hospitals struggle with inadequate resources, is indefensible.

Similarly, the idea of a special hospital for parliamentarians raises questions about equity and fairness. Healthcare is a fundamental right, not a privilege reserved for a select few. Instead of advocating for exclusive facilities, Afenyo-Markin should champion reforms that improve healthcare access for all Ghanaians. As Nelson Mandela famously said, “A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones.”

A Call for Reflection and Accountability

Afenyo-Markin’s proposals highlight a troubling pattern of hydrological presence—flooding the public discourse with ideas that lack substance or alignment with national priorities. It is time for him and his party to reflect on their legacy and the opportunities they squandered. Rather than proposing grandiose projects, they should focus on addressing the systemic issues that continue to hinder Ghana’s development.

Ghanaians deserve leaders who prioritize their needs and work tirelessly to improve their lives. The focus should be on rebuilding trust, fostering transparency, and delivering results that benefit the majority, not the privileged few. As the Akan proverb goes, “If the drum beats too loudly, it may burst.” Afenyo-Markin would do well to heed this wisdom and temper his rhetoric with humility and accountability.

Conclusion: A New Direction for Leadership

The time has come for Ghana’s leaders to align their actions with the aspirations of the people. Proposals like a new parliamentary chamber or a special hospital for parliamentarians only serve to deepen the divide between the political elite and ordinary citizens. Afenyo-Markin and his colleagues must recognize that true leadership is about service, not self-interest.

Ghana’s future depends on leaders who are willing to make tough decisions, prioritize the needs of the many, and build a legacy of progress and equity. Anything less is a betrayal of the trust placed in them by the people. It is time to move beyond empty proposals and focus on the real work of nation-building.

Retired Senior Citizen
Teshie-Nungua