Ibrahim Traoré’s rise to power in Burkina Faso through a military coup reflects the country’s deep governance crisis. While he presents himself as a leader of goodwill, military rule is inherently fragile and unsustainable. Though hailed as a hero, his legitimacy stems not from the ballot but from force, raising concerns about the country’s democratic future. His takeover was fueled by the failures of democracy, where elected leaders enriched themselves while citizens suffered. Years of corruption, inequality, and mismanagement disillusioned the masses, creating an illusion that military rule was the only alternative. But is Traoré’s leadership a step forward or a dangerous detour?
Military takeovers often lead to a dangerous cycle, one coup paving the way for another. The same force that propelled Traoré to power could remove him just as swiftly. Wearing a uniform and parading security does not project strength but rather insecurity. History shows that ruling with the gun breeds uncertainty, making Burkina Faso vulnerable to future instability. While his promises of stability and progress resonate with the people, military governance rarely sustains legitimacy. The longer it lasts, the greater the risk of internal resistance within the army and among the people. Stability cannot be built on the fear of force but on strong institutions that ensure fairness and justice.
If Traoré is sincere about leading Burkina Faso to prosperity, he must address the fundamental flaws that have weakened its democracy. Rather than holding onto power through military rule, he should focus on reforms that guarantee fair governance and prevent the return of corrupt leadership. A new constitution that ensures inclusivity and accountability could be a starting point. Leadership is not a prize reserved for the military. It must be open to all Burkinabés through a transparent electoral process. If Traoré is confident in his vision, he should step down, contest elections, and allow others with similar ambitions to compete. Stability lies in democratic legitimacy, not in indefinite military rule.
Another critical issue is governance quality under military rule. Running a country requires more than military discipline, it demands economic foresight, administrative expertise, and diplomatic acumen. The question remains: Is Traoré relying on experts to drive national development, or is he experimenting with trial and error? If civilians already play key roles in his administration, then there is no excuse for delaying a return to civilian rule. The more extended military control persists, the harder it becomes to transition back. Governance should be in the hands of those with the knowledge and experience to build a stable and prosperous nation, not those who seized power by force.
Supporters of Traoré’s military rule must acknowledge its risks. While he may enjoy public approval today, military governments often lose popularity as economic challenges mount. When dissatisfaction grows, another coup—or worse, civil unrest—becomes inevitable. True stability is not enforced by the military but built through inclusive governance, economic opportunity, and institutional integrity. Burkina Faso must not fall into the trap of viewing military dominance as a long-term solution. Instead, the focus should be on reforms that ensure equality, participation, and national progress. Burkina Faso stands at a crossroads. Traoré can either continue the cycle of military rule or set the foundation for true democracy. The best path forward is to initiate constitutional reforms, create fair electoral processes, and transition power through elections. Power must be legitimised through the people’s will, not by the barrel of a gun. If Traoré truly believes in his leadership, he should submit it to democratic choice. The future of Burkina Faso depends not on military strength but on strong institutions and the empowerment of its people.
Isaac Ofori
Social Activist and Human Rights Advocate
[email protected]