body-container-line-1

Justice Atuguba weighs in on NDC's reintroduction of public tribunals and accountability

By Ayure Inga Agana II Contributor

Retired Supreme Court Justice William Atuguba has shared his thoughts on the potential reintroduction of public tribunals in Ghana, a proposal recently discussed by the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) and echoed by Attorney General Dr. Dominic Ayine.

Speaking on The Assembly podcast with Dr. Ayure-inga Mark Agana, Justice Atuguba reflected on the historical role of public tribunals under the Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC) and their mixed reception within the legal community.

“During the PNDC era, public tribunals were established to enhance accountability, but they were heavily criticized, particularly by the legal profession,” he noted. “Lawyers boycotted them for a long time, even though attempts were made to appease them by allowing appeals to the National Appeals Tribunal. Still, many were not satisfied with the system.”

Public tribunals, as structured under the PNDC, included a mix of legal professionals and non-professionals. This, according to Justice Atuguba, was a major point of contention. “A lawyer would strictly apply legal principles to determine outcomes, while public tribunals incorporated lay perspectives, which some legal professionals found unsettling,” he explained.

Despite their controversial nature, Justice Atuguba acknowledged that public tribunals, once the initial revolutionary fervor subsided, functioned effectively in addressing corruption and misconduct. He referenced the infamous case of the three high court judges and a retired army officer who were murdered in 1982, noting that public outcry demanded their killers be tried before the tribunals rather than through the ordinary courts.

While public tribunals historically played a role in accountability, their reintroduction in today’s democratic context remains debatable. Critics argue that such tribunals could undermine the independence of the judiciary, while supporters see them as a means to expedite justice and curb corruption. Justice Atuguba’s reflections add depth to the ongoing discourse on governance and legal reform in Ghana.

Disclaimer:  ModernGhana is not responsible for the accuracy or reliability of this report and its content. More Follow our WhatsApp channel for meaningful stories picked for your day.

Please note that ModernGhana is not responsible for the accuracy or reliability of this report and its content.

As a content curation and syndication platform, we ethically select and publish news articles from various credible online sources that we believe will be of interest to our readers.

We publish four types of content on a daily basis: Curated content, Syndicated content, User-generated content and Original content.

Our curated content consists of carefully chosen articles from reputable websites, which are properly credited and linked back to the original source to drive traffic.

Syndicated content is provided to us by other websites looking to increase their readership and expand their brand awareness. User-generated content includes opinion pieces and contributions from our dedicated readers, which we publish for the benefit of our diverse audience.

Additionally, we produce original content through our team of experienced journalists and correspondents from across the country. It is important to note that the opinions expressed on this platform do not necessarily reflect our own views. We value freedom of speech and therefore, may publish opinions that may not align with our own or those of our readers.

We understand that some opinions may be objectionable to some individuals, but we believe in upholding the principle of absolute freedom of speech. If you do not agree with this principle, we kindly advise you not to visit our website.

READ MORE

Just in....

Does 2025 Budget inspire hope?

Started: 11-03-2025 | Ends: 01-06-2025

body-container-line