Politicians who have the courage to point to their achievements in the
last fifty years may have to do a serious retrospection. In most instances
they have been able to hoodwink us all into believing they would deliver.
Pitifully, our countryside folks fall for their gimmicks and later to be
marginalized from the hobnob of creative enterprise.
But they glow with gratitude during elections when they get the chance to
exact their voting rights worth; maize, salt, cooking oil, chicken thighs,
building materials and party T-shirts.
But these political baits are the very things they would have been able to
create or purchase if their travails and produce from mother earth were
recognized, just as it was easy for a bureaucrat to see his pay check
accumulate with raises, even when the general health of the economy is not
in very good shape.
I'm not talking of a recognition that begins and ends with huge rallies to
award a myriad of subsistence farmers for doing so well to remain
subsistence. I am talking about the ability to hire and fire those who
they entrust their taxes, hopes and aspirations to. Aspirations that stem
from economic competition, decentralized decision making and build
innovative solutions to our prehistoric farming culture, hopes that cuddle
the aged even into their graves and taxes that help in opening up the
countryside to tenths of subsistence agricultural produce.
But having been gatekeepers of national resources and a five-decade long
penchant for aggressive wide-eyed policies of chasing free dollars
abroad, the desire to look within for redemption from poverty appears to
be light years away.
Poor people's taxes in the rich western world have been mollycoddle into
donor driven agencies freely given in the hope that all will trickle to
the poor. But much of these funds far from being phantom aid, were
supposed to go into agriculture production. But how much have we not sunk
into agricultural projects without a careful thought on marketing the
produce? How much have we not sunk into poverty alleviation projects
without due diligence, monitoring and evaluation?
In truth, not all the IMF/World Bank reforms yielded nothing. Poor
evaluation, deliberate weakening of oversight institutions and profligate
spending on the part of beneficiary countries meant little of the gains
was left for diversifying the economy. We have had our own experience with
how gains from Structural Adjustment and Economic Recovery Programmes,
even if they were minimal as some may argue, were not used properly to
diversify our agrarian-based economy. Sadly, when the first energy crisis
hit us in the late 90s we could not keep up. It was worsened by the
financial crisis that hit Asia.
The world has learnt very little from this betrayal. The providers of the
aid dollars are happy to keep their jobs of fighting poverty; so their
ability to dole out aid dollars usually means they are doing so well. Even
the World Bank admitted that the more aid they gave, the more they saw
poverty increase. Sadly they say, they have no choice but to keep on
giving. Recent happenings within the World Bank points to this efficiency
So, here we are, with a political party that began well, reversing the
misfortunes that plagued our economy under previous governments. However,
it began trumpeting its relative success and then stood still while
receiving accolades from far and near. But the bolts were soon to come off
the wheels carrying the past glories and plunged everyone, who wanted
political change into a deep, distracting energy crisis. This has left
close to 35% of businesses either out of operation or beating the pathway
of high operational costs due to usage of electronic generators.
But having correctly blamed the previous government for the energy crisis,
Ghanaians now are being asked to turn to God- Apparently He is responsible
for the shortage of rain to atone for our sins. The good thing though is,
the anti-development alarmist slogan of Climate Change is not being cited
as the culprit.
Humour aside, one can only describe as disturbing, a future that less than
a year ago looked brighter but has under the aegis of political naivety
began an avalanche of reverses due to the current energy crisis.
Even if it seems sensible that the current administration should suffer
electoral defeats for such punishable oversight, the question to ask is,
whom are they handing over to? The alternatives staring us come with a
baggage. Some say Socialism is the new kid on the bloc as Latin America is
immersed in it. Then there is social democracy. Apostles of this version
of political creed, argue that it is better to stay in the middle than
being extreme right or extreme left--but that's a confused formula for
running an economy- one can predict with certainty that the scales would
turn toward more centralist planning as has been with countries that
practiced social democracy. Winston Churchill is instructive here-"The
inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the
inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery."
Whatever choices we make, we must be able to find lasting solutions to the
energy problem. Some have reasonably argued for nuclear energy because it
is cheap, efficient and less dangerous. Others want nature-solar and wind
energy. Ultimately, it is the leaders of the day who need to be convinced
of the reason
If only the current leadership and their successors will accept that
politics is not magic, but an art that could win over hearts and minds of
people with the right choices, choices that give opportunity to every one
to excel, choices that accommodate dissenting opinions, choices that
reward innovation and enterprise, choices that allow ordinary people to
say what form of enlightened government they want, ultimately that would
be the voice of truth, light and economic growth. The contrary is deceit,
darkness and economic depression.
*Franklin Cudjoe is a Humane Studies Fellow and director of Imani, a
Ghanaian think-tank. He has spoken severally on four continents. Send him
an email at franklin (-at-) imanighana.org
Disclaimer: "The views/contents expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not neccessarily reflect those of Modern Ghana. Modern Ghana will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article."
Reproduction is authorised provided the author's permission is granted.