China & The Free World: The Socialistic & Capitalistic Entrepreneurialism

Entrepreneurial Mysticism, a term used to describe the seemingly inexplicable forces that drive entrepreneurs to create groundbreaking ideas and mobilize their physical and mental capacities, is a key factor in the development of our commercial world. Relax and listen

In the business world, there are two distinct mindsets: the mindset of job seekers, who are looking for employment, and the mindset of job creators, who are focused on building and growing their own ventures. Understanding these mindsets is crucial when addressing national challenges related to productivity, scalability, and exportability.

This is not a harsh critique of the limitations of current economic development procedures across the free world but an entrepreneurial response to assist in grand progress. At the same time, it compares the super success of China's national mobilization of Entrepreneurialism, whether socialistic or not, and how it has been a great success.

At the same time, the first-ever National Mobilization of Entrepreneurialism, the original American version, was a super success during the last century. Was it a better capitalistic journey? Are they both right and wrong? Something must perform as a global survival strategy.

There are different national attitudes toward entrepreneurship. Some countries, like China, adopt a more socialistic approach, while others, like the USA, lean towards capitalism. Understanding these attitudes is crucial for both job creators and job seekers, as it can influence the level of risk-taking and the success of entrepreneurial ventures.

Fact: Entrepreneurialism does not wear a mask, a uniform, a flag, or some wild fight; it is a peaceful march of a person, a solo mystique in search of the unimaginable, striving, struggling, and repeatedly attempting to go beyond the horizon of human endeavor.

Fact: It is a journey marked by unexplained strategy, monumental sequences of efforts, and random creativity, all under entrepreneurial Mysticism. Entrepreneurs are fully committed to their projects, taking on full responsibility and striving to solve extraordinary problems with unexplainable and impossible solutions.

Fact: If you can see, touch, hear, taste, or feel anything extraordinary around you, it was only conceived, developed, and commercialized by an entrepreneur. No great ideas or the world's largest enterprises were ever hatched inside a chicken farm; the entrepreneur created each as a tiny, unknown little shack and carved history.

Fact: Entrepreneurial behavior is Capitalistic at best. It is still capable of breathing Communism or Socialism, as controlled economy nations do; they have their own versions of Entrepreneurship. Nevertheless, Entrepreneurship is neither driven by an ideology nor a particular dogma.

Jack Ma was allowed to become from nobody to China's first and richest person but equally stopped becoming a Godzilla like in each of the free economies, where they stomp around crushing national policies without any regard to what it does to the little creature in the jungle of commerce.

Thank you, China, for proving the value of good governance via Socialism. Now, the world's free economies must study deeply why they are all in such a mess: debt, almost no productivity, and restless citizenry.

Entrepreneurial Mysticism is very different. It is a unique passion with exceptional willpower, immune to risks and failures, often challenging current methodologies, creating unseen problems, and finding unseen solutions—like playing in a sandbox without any stress. It is a natural behavior to achieve extraordinary success on an impossible journey. Historically, such rags to nobility have always resulted in exceptional results, great rewards, and profits, leading to entrepreneurs' accumulation of extraordinary wealth. However, this wealth is not the primary goal.

Entrepreneurs do not start with a scheme to make fast money, nor do they hunger for cash for a bling-bling lifestyle. A study of the last 100 super entrepreneurs worldwide would prove that.

Entrepreneurialism is a global phenomenon with no color, culture, race, or religion. It is natural, original, personalized, neutral, diverse, tolerant, quality-focused, success-driven, and limitless struggling challenge. Entrepreneurs get along well with all others, are highly diverse, global, and entrepreneurially friendly without hostility, like athletes in the Olympics competing with themselves and improving their skills.

Worldwide, entrepreneurs have a cause, a unique one and highly personal. The greatest inventions and commercial ideas would have never materialized if local, national, or public opinion were at play. Incidentally, most brilliant ideas die out simply as other naive spectators reject them at the starting gates. Entrepreneurs have very thick skin like others who work on stage; they become fearless and can handle all kinds of criticism. They observe, learn, and pay a lot of importance to markets and detailed patterns but only get influenced by spectators or crowd calls with real-life experiences and an extreme understanding of the subject.

Some countries are fortunate to have national leadership that deeply understands entrepreneurship and can measure and decipher this hidden treasure. They strategically push their small and medium enterprises towards global maturity and international success, providing valuable models for others to learn from.

A list of some 200 nations around the world, ranked on 'Ease of doing business,' tells another 200 stories of sorts about why they are not in the top or middle but at the bottom, about why they missed the boat and why they are still struggling behind on national mobilization of Entrepreneurship. Most importantly, when leadership lacks such skills, it becomes impossible for the bureaucracies of the day to adopt corrective measures.

The Entrepreneurial Races:
What is happening in China
100 years ago, China was an unknown country despite 4000 years of history and glory

50 years ago, China was unknown on all global economic lists and indices.

30 years ago, it was laughed at as an upcoming country in the West

10 years ago, it was labeled as an economic threat to the West

Today: Is it pre-war time now?
What is happening in the USA
100 years ago, the USA was the most respected country despite its short history and glory

50 years ago, the USA was the top player in each global economic list and indices.

30 years ago, it was laughed at for losing its focus and missing its edge

10 years ago, it was labeled as a threat by half the world

Today: Is it just in chaos selecting war themes

Is China Teaching Socialistic Entrepreneurialism to Free Economies of The World

China is a land before time, a history of trade since recorded history. In the last century, in a land where routinely millions of people would die in a revolution of some kind, while less than one dollar -a living was considered a super luxury, China maintained high productivity standards due to such intertwined cultural revolutions and during the traditional build-up of the Chinese character and national culture of regimented discipline.

Historically, China has always been the most innovative nation with a vibrant history, but it is a super complex global power internally. China has also been the most productive nation in the world, and for that reason why, it has become the world's largest super-factory super-manufacturing to the entire world. No other country can provide global consumption of goods as fast with value as China delivers today.

It's time for Western economists who may have overlooked China's and most ASEAN nations' unique entrepreneurial approach to managing the small and midsize enterprise economic sectors to delve deeper. The highly disciplined and productive approach to daily work performance, the respect for work, and the sheer productivity of a billion SMEs across the continent are all aspects that warrant a deeper study.

No wonder 99% of the world's top brands were inspired in Asia by their original, innovative quality and handicraft skills. These were finally mass-produced for the West under their guidance, and they ended up as the top brand organizations in the world.

No other country like China and ASEAN was able to produce such global-scale quality at such bargain prices with consistency and quality control. No wonder production and quality control, as basic attitudes towards production, gave China and other nations the solid foundation to keep growing.

No wonder the common thought on China among the populace of the free economies has yet to mature fully. They are still claiming expertise in trade and commerce in China, lingering for too long over decades in their local city's Chinatowns, and not fully grasping that Chinese are far more than just making 'chicken-fried rice' or laundry.

With 105 cities with populations over one million, China's urban growth is unmatched, outpacing India with 65 cities and the USA with just nine cities.

The visible failure of Western economies in SME development, particularly in upswinging exporters and reskilling manufacturers, is a clear sign that drastic changes and improvements are needed. Needed is the sharp, proven ability to understand how to advance a tiny, unknown small enterprise or atelier into an advanced, high-tech global-scale operation. A deeper study of China and ASEAN nations is suggested.

In the free economies, no wonder the broken-down models of cheerleading, or a busload of SMEs trained a year, with some plastic award nights, is what each country is happily engaged with. Therefore, it isn't easy to decipher how the national mobilization of Entrepreneurialism works and why uplifting 30% to 50% of high-potential SMEs of the nation and placing them on digital platforms so they may scale worldwide is such a long-stretched objective.

No wonder Western economic development is critically missing and lingering as its economic development teams are still toying with programs and procedures in SME sectors, where China once was 50 years ago.

The damage caused by the reckless pursuit of globalization over the past few decades is still visible in the economies of free nations. Despite observing China's rapid growth for many years, little has been done to mobilize small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Western economies. This lack of action has resulted in a generation being left behind, with confusion and a shortage of skills prevailing. All free economies must conduct thorough audits and testing of their economic development teams and fill in the skill gaps that can be observed on platforms such as LinkedIn. This is necessary to bring about a significant transformation.

Expothon & National Mobilization of Entrepreneurialism?

For many years, Expothon Worldwide, a global initiative from this Canadian think tank, has been the trusted source of exclusive narratives on the 'national mobilization of entrepreneurialism protocols.' developed during the last decade. These insights, shared on a weekly basis, now reach some 2000 selected VIP recipients from the national cabinet-level government officials across 100 free economies.

This track record of expertise and trust is the foundation of our proposed strategies. The step-by-step application of well-defined and proven methodologies helped create a grand-scale national agenda of up-skilling exporters and re-skilling manufacturers and mobilizing high-potential SMEs of the nation.

Global Hub: Currently, Expothon is developing a global hub to provide large-scale senior-level guidance to selected 100 free economies and blocs like GCC, OIC, European Union, African Union, ASEAN Commonwealth, and BRICS. This initiative aims to enhance the 'National mobilization Entrepreneurship' by offering nation-specific, customized deployment solutions. The Global Hub, fully equipped and prepared, will deploy 1000 experts with global digital accessibility to guide some 50-100 countries on managing their national SME base, upskilling exporters, and re-skilling manufacturers.

Education will not solve the national economic struggles; mobilization of targeted skills will. Border walls and the army will not stop immigration; the massive uplift of the grassroots economy and the national mobilization of SME entrepreneurialism will achieve it.

Yearly bureaucratic lip service to SME sectors has not produced anything during the last decades; it is the national mobilization of exportability and manufacturing. Of course, massive organization is needed to bring all parties on the same page and start as a national agenda. As China did a few decades ago, India a couple of decades ago, and dozens of other nations are getting ready now. It is a race, and not all countries will win. Study more on Google.

The rest is easy.