ModernGhanalogo

FEATURED: Tithe Collection Is To Be Declared As Illegal...

body-container-line-1
01.06.2020 Oil and Gas

ACEP Insists Ghana Gas Too Small To Have Independent National Players

ACEP Insists Ghana Gas Too Small To Have Independent National Players
LISTEN JUN 1, 2020

African Center for Energy Policy (ACEP) still stands by its suggestion for government to make the Ghana National Gas Company (GNGC) a subsidiary of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC) with regards to the implementation of the Gas Master Plan and not an aggregator.

According to ACEP, Ghana's oil and gas sector is too small to have many independent national players.

ACEP had earlier kicked against the approval of the Ghana National Gas Company (GNGC) as the national gas aggregator by the Office of the President.

ACEP said GNGC does not have the capacity to assume the liabilities of the commitments that come with the role of an aggregator in the Ghanaian oil and gas sector.

However, the Ghana National Gas Company Limited debunked the claims, stating that GNGC is capable.

But a statement signed by the Executive Director of ACEP, Benjamin Boakye explained that, “the existence of GNGC as an independent company, as shown in ACEP's earlier analysis, is a product of politics and not an optimal option for Ghana's developing oil industry.”

ACEP’s latest statement is in response to a rejoinder from the Ghana National Gas Company (GNGC) on the Centre's “Analysis of the Proposal to Make Ghana National Gas Company (GNGC) The National Gas Aggregator” published on 21st May 2020.

“It is important to state that ACEP's analysis did not target the operational efficiency, which the Centre has a lot to say about, or the capacity of GNGC to deliver on its functions as is or hopes to be. The analysis was meant to highlight the challenges with the policy directive from the Presidency which GNGC happen to be the proponent of and the beneficiary of the policy change,” ACEP’s stated noted.

ACEP explained that “In essence, the analysis was meant for the policymakers, and not an advocate of the policy. Therefore, if GNGC has a response, it should be directed at the policymakers. We look forward to a response from policymakers on the analysis of the issue and not from GNGC”.

Among other demands, ACEP explained that the weak balance sheet of GNGC makes it unattractive to the investor community, which has implication for resource exploration and production.

Background

In 2015, government approved the takeover of GNGC by GNPC as a subsidiary for the latter.

A key consideration for this consolidation was to make it possible to have a more integrated management and financing of projects in the oil and gas sector.

According to ACEP, this was particularly necessary to provide the needed financial securities for the development of the Offshore Cape Three Points (OCTP) project.

ACEP's position on this arrangement was that GNPC had the capacity to manage gas projects and had the financial muscle through its share of petroleum revenues to undertake new gas projects, for the purpose of expanding gas processing and transmission facilities.

---citinewsroom

body-container-line