Listen to music while browsing

NPP legal team must apologise to Atuguba et al – Nana Ato Dadzie

By Myjoyonline.com | Isaac Essel
By Myjoyonline.com | Isaac Essel

1/12/2013 7:30:20 PM -

The NPP ought to render unqualified apology to judges at the Supreme Court, especially Justice William Atuguba, for embarking on an action that sought to injure the integrity of the panel to hear the NPP's petition against the 2012 election results, Nana Ato Dadzie has demanded.

The NPP had on Thursday objected to a member of the panel to hear the NDC joinder only to make a u-turn a day after in a letter addressed to the Registrar of the Supreme Court, stating the team's decision not to pursue the matter in order to facilitate an expeditious determination of the petition.

But speaking on Joy FM's news analysis programme Newsfile Nana Ato Dadzie, a counsel member of the NDC that is seeking to join the petition, contended: “You accused a panel of likelihood of bias and you don't name the person, you put all nine judges in a problematic position…into disrepute”

He posited: “If you've changed your mind, the proper thing to do is to go before the nine judges and said Lord we are on our kneels, we apologize… That is the more honorable thing to do.”

He asserted that an apology is required after the General Secretary of the NPP, Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie, had threatened to expose the judge they objected to, which the NDC have speculated to be Mr Willian Atuguba, with 'more challenging things'. According to him, the “horrendous” statements made by Mr Owusu Afriyie, moment after the objection was raised in court, should as well be condemned.

“All the nine judges, particularly Justice Atuguba and the people of this country are entitled to an unqualified apology from the legal team that went to make some allegations of impropriety against the judges to frustrate and delay this trial,” he insisted.

Nana Ato Dadzie also faulted both procedures used by the NPP to raise the objection and rescinding it.

“You will have to ask the registrar, by way of a letter, to have the court sit and then you bring a formal application withdrawing your objection... what happens to the written order? There must be record that the written order itself has been revoked”

He wondered if the NPP legal team thought through before raising the objection and advised them to “hasty slowly”.

“We think that the whole application, the entire petition was brought in haste. On the face of it you can see gross errors, just ordinarily arithmetical errors, avoidable errors.”

Meanwhile, Professor Mike Ocquaye, former Deputy Speaker of Parliament, on the same programme, asked the leadership of the NDC, especially lawyers, to stop feeding the public with false information about the trial.

He said some people have deliberately decided to misconstrue the request by the NPP that the objection should be held in-camera with the whole trial.

“When such statements are made, abandoned, ran away, now they want to cause delay… then you are creating by propaganda [with] falsehood, that pollute the atmosphere. I must say this with all seriousness, especially when it comes from lawyers. I think we as professionals, we must take away the propaganda, and do the thing professionally and advocate the professional position in public.”

Comment found to contain email addressen and weblinks will be rejected
 
 
 
NANA ATO DADZE
VICTOR | 1/12/2013 8:27:00 PM
YOU SAY YOU A LAWTER AND YOU ARE MAKING NOISE THAT THE NPP WANT THE COURT CASE TO BE HELD IN CAMERA AFTER THEY HAVE SAID THAT THE CASE WOULD BE HEARD TIN PUBLIC. BUT DO YOU NOT KNOW THAT AT THE HEARING OF A CASE WHEN IT BECOMES NECCESSARY THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF THE CASE MUST BE HEARD IN CAMERA THAT CQAN BE DONE?? EVEN I AS A LAYMAN KNOW THAT AT A CERTAIN POIT DURING THE TRIAL OF A CASE SOMETHING CAN COME UP FOR SOME PART OF THE MATTER TO BE HEARD IN PUBLIC., BUT YOU AS A LAWYER, IS SAYING THAT IT IS WRONG FOR THE NPP TO REQUEST THAT WHAT THEY WANT TO ALLEGE CANNOT BE HEARD IN CAMERA!! DID YOU WANT THE NPP LAWYERS JUST TO STAND UP IN OPEN COURT AND ACCUSE A JUDGE FOR THE LIKELIHOOD OF BEING BIASED? WHERE DID YOU LEARN YOUR LAW?? I AM NOT A LAWYER BUT I KNOW WHAT THE NPP LAWYERS DID WAS CORRECT IN PRACTICE. SO IF IT WAS YOU WILL YOU JUST STAND IN OPEN COURT AND ACCUSE A JUDGE? I DO NOT THINK YOU ARE INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO BE A LAWYER.
A CASE IN CAMERA IS OFTEN ALLO
DR KING | 1/12/2013 9:17:00 PM
I WILL ADVISE SOME LAWYERS NOT TO MAKE MOCKERY OF THEMSELVES.DO NOT ASSUME THAT LAYMEN CANNOT UNDERSTAND SIMPLE LEGAL INTERPRETATIONS.LET THE SUPREME COURT BE ITS OWN SPOKESPERSON.
ATO DADZIE DON'T BE deleted
ANTO DADDY | 1/13/2013 1:44:00 AM
THE deletedISHMAN, ATO DADZIE MUST CLOSE HIS (SNOUT)PIG'S MOUTH AND FACE FACTS. HE KNOWS VERY WELL THAT ATUGUBA CAN UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES BE TRUSTED.