body-container-line-1
09.01.2016 Feature Article

Do Christian Clergymen Indeed Have The Wisdom Of Elohiym They Claim To Have?? - Part 2

Do Christian Clergymen Indeed Have The Wisdom Of Elohiym They Claim To Have?? - Part 2
09.01.2016 LISTEN

Dear KA, thank you for your letter commenting on my article of the above caption which was published on the Modern Ghana internet site not long ago! Thank you for your comments, and for trusting that my response to them could be a blessing to you and others too! For this reason, I publish my reply in the very medium you read the article so that, as is your desire, other readers may be blessed by my response.

Let me begin my response by quoting for you your own words: “In reference to the quotes you stated in your article—Romans 13:1-7, First Timothy 2:1-3, First Peter 2:13-17—I believe these were not commandments but the personal views of the apostle. For example in the bible an apostle states ‘... I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper...’ This is a personal comment not a commandment. And so, concerning your quotes, I believe they border on morality and not necessarily commandments.”

Well, according to the scriptures, anyone who gets to be genuinely born anew—that is, born of mayim (water) and of Ruwakh HaKodesh (Holy Spirit?) in the true manner of [the Ivri] tevilah in a mikveh mayim of running natural waters (baptism?)—gets to live inside the person of Yahushua (the only true name of the Savior) and, at the same time, has Yahushua and his Abba (Father), Yahuwah Elohiym, also coming to indwell him—cf. Hisgalus (Revelation) 3:20, YahuKhanan (John) 14:20, 21, 23, 15:5, 17:23, Galatians 2:20, Ephesians 3:17-19, Colossians 1:27, YahuKhanan Alef (First John) 3:24!! So then, the born anew experience is such a weighty and glorious issue no one should take lightly.

Anyone who is blessed in the manner that these verses teach can be said to be fully possessed by Yahushua and Yahuwah Elohiym, for they live and are very active in that person; and, in fact, no one can behave differently from anyone who lives in and possesses him!

So then, the life that a born anew person lives, he no longer lives by his own strength as he did before becoming born anew, but by the strength of Yahuwah who now inhabits him just as Galatians 2:20 reveals!!

And so, when the writers of Romans 13:1-7, First Timothy 2:1-3, and First Peter 2:13-17, say what they say by these verses, they are speaking as to reveal the WILL of Yahushua and his Abba—who are living in these very writers—for them and their readers to comply with, since the WILL of Yahushua and his Abba are, in fact, their COMMANDMENTS to these writers, and to all other truth seekers, to obey.

That is why I said in my article that the clergymen who did not live in compliance with these verses broke the commandments of their constitution [their English Bible!]. Not that they were just harsh in their words, they had no right to do what they did.

We must learn to obey anything that holy men of the past obeyed and instructed us in their writings to obey or emulate, for that is what Yahushua himself meant for all his genuine followers to do in his “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s . . .” teaching of MattitYahu (Matthew?) 22:21; just as he himself did in order to meet the WILL [or COMMAND] of his Abba, and also to set an example for his followers!!

Moving forward let me again quote your own words: “. . . on the names Jesus Christ (Yahushua) and God (Elohiym), you may have the original transcript of the bible and not necessarily believing in History and Culture of his "assumed family” otherwise, your claim may not hold. Also, God is a spirit and per the attributes we give him which are all true, he works with us on individual basis and not group hence if I called upon him by using "Jesus Christ" he knows exactly where I am coming from and will therefore not hesitate in coming to my aid. A major problem of present day teachers in the faith is that we are being too much into knowledge seeking or centered as against the practicality of the faith. The early leaders of the faith like Paul were practical and not necessarily quoting the scriptures all the time.”—emphasis mine.

Dear KA, no one should live in isolation today and so, it is very easy to look for and find the true names of the Savior and the Most High One which were revealed at Creation from other seekers of truth.

The Most High One revealed Himself and everything about the mission of His son to earth, long before it happened, to only Ivriim (Hebrew people) among all kindred of mankind. Every name He gave of Himself and of His son was in Ivrit (Hebrew language), so that the people He spoke to would know what these names stand for.

I must say that, historically and anthropologically, no person who was native to Yisroel was ever called by any of the English names, Jesus, Christ, John, Matthew, Simon, etc, from the time of Avraham to the date of birth of the Savior, simply because the English race and the crudest form of their language came seven good centuries after the ascension of the Savior.

The English language was never in any human mind for it to be used to name anybody until the seventh century. So the one who died for your salvation was never called or known as JESUS CHRIST, until some liars after the seventh century began to deceive mankind with this fake name!

The question to ask is: do men have the right to rename the Savior, even more weirdly so, posthumously, by giving him an English name, and thus nullifying the value of the Ivrit name by which his parents were commanded by Elohiym through a holy malak (angel) that he be so named at birth?? You see, the name JESUS is simply out of place in Yisroel, just as the names Osei and Fofie of the Akan people of Ghana are out of place in the culture of Zulu people!

If you get the copy of The Orthodox Jewish Bible (OJB), edited by Dr. Phillip E. Goble, you will get to know some 139 indigenous Ivrit names given by Elohiym to holy men who, down the ages, had roles to play in the execution of the salvation plan of Elohiym that are either prefixed or suffixed with Yahu; Yahu being the short construct for Yahuwah, the name of the Most High One.

Some of these are YeshaYahu (not Isaiah), YirmeYahu (not Jeremiah), YahuKhanan (not John), ZakharYahu (not Zechariah) and, therefore, you will not doubt where today’s Binyamin NatanYahu descends from! These names are so unique and sacred that hardly did more than one person bear any—e.g. Avraham, Moshe, ElYahu, YeshaYahu and top of the pack, Yahushua!!

As the Most High One Yahuwah begot a son and named him Yahushua (so that His Yahuwah nature, power, glory, etc, would permanently dwell in His Yahushua-named son), which mortal humans dared to change this Ivrit Yahushua to the Greek IZEUS or Iesous (meaning the son of Zeus), and thence to the Latin IESUS, and then, to the English JESUS?? Since the root of JESUS is in ZEUS, a Greek deity, are Christians not worshipping ZEUS through a back door? Just think about this!!

So then, because you have no right to dictate to Elohiym, don’t suppose that He must respond to you when you mention the name of deception and evil roots [JESUS]! You see, the deceiver who took the name Yahushua from you and gave you his JESUS is he who responds to your cries in the name of JESUS. Don’t you get it?? And as you know, “tares” look like “wheat” but, unlike wheat, they are only fit to be burned at the end of time—MattitYahu (Matthew?) 13:24-30!

Let me also say this: Faith only comes by hearing the word of Elohiym—cf. Romans 10:14—and not that of translators or yours! How and why would you have “faith” in “JESUS” which Elohiym never uttered and disregard the YAHUSHUA He has given as the name of His son?? Elohiym rewards no such ignorant persons who speak into the air asking for salvation without knowing the only one true name recognized in Heaven by which everyone must be saved—Acts 4:10-12. Where, then, would be His justice and fairness when all YAHUSHUA and JESUS believers are rewarded in same way??

Yes, at times, teachers of the way of salvation may have to quote copiously from Scripture to bring people to the TRUTH; maybe unlike Sha’ul (never refer to him as Paul) and others did. Don’t forget these great men did not have the Beyrit Khadasha (New Testament?) written out for them to quote from! They are those people who the Most High One used to write them (the Beyrit Khadasha) for our benefit.

Dear KA, I pray you will write to me again soon, and to comment on what I said in my article are fatal errors that Christian clergymen lead their followers to commit.

Do you not see it to be a problem that Christian clergymen are misleading their followers by turning the Lord’s Supper memorial into a daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly Sunday Breakfast at their whims; what about the impossibility of counting three days and three nights between a Friday evening-hour burial and a supposed Sunday dawn resurrection, in reference to the Savior’s death, burial, and resurrection accounts; and of renaming the Ivri-born Savior with a Gentile name that only evolved seven centuries after the Savior was named by his Ivri parents under the instructions of the Most High One, thereby hiding the Savior’s true identity?? Please let me hear you speak to these issues of grave importance!

Dear KA, I hope you find my responses to your comments useful; and please, do let us continue the conversation. Shalom aleikhem.

PS: Should readers of this and any of my articles have serious questions or suggestions, they may contact me via e-mail by clicking on “Contact” on the Home Page of my website, http://sbprabooks.com/BongleBapuohyele . You may also purchase a copy of my book—Beware of This False Doctrine: Of Reciting the Sinners' Prayer for Salvation—via the same web address so, together, we walk the narrow way to the presence of Elohiym. Shalom.

body-container-line