Charlotte's Poor First Impression

Studying the nuances of diplomacy and applying same for effect is good for all public servants. Even in everyday life being careful about words, expressions and body language pays a lot. Indeed it stands one apart from reckless talkers.

The first impression which a person or the head of a public institution exacts is very critical because a second opportunity for this never comes.

When a diplomat or for that matter a country's envoy is engaged in espionage or other activities unbecoming for their status in their duty stations, the description for the misconduct is interesting; it is enveloped in finesse largely common to the realm of diplomacy. Such expressions as 'engaging in inappropriate activities or not commensurate with their status' are some of the expressions used in diplomacy.

The fallouts from being blunt in expressing such matters are obviated by the use of such diplomatic expressions. It is not for nothing that the president or other top dignitaries are not described as lying. 'He is being economical with the truth' is the most preferable. Even in our local languages some expressions are skilfully clothed. Sexual intercourse or even death is presented in a manner which only adults can comprehend. Deviating from such subtle presentations creates a negative impression about the person making them.

 Unfortunately, Charlotte Osei has failed to register an acceptable first impression. As a person with the National Commission For Civic Education (NCCE) background, she lost an opportunity to make an indelible positive first impression in an unnecessary reaction to the 'Let My Vote Count' grouping's continuing demand for a new voters' register.

Her description of their demands and incessant media presence in that regard as ugly noise and her remark that she would not be intimidated are as unnecessary as they are bellicose. Drawing the battle line between and those on the side of a new voters' register appears to be what she has done. That might not be the case but her unwitting reaction has left a bilious feeling in the palates of most Ghanaians and that originating from her maiden engagement with the media, especially on a very sensitive and crucial issue as the replacement of a corrupted voters' register, is dangerous.

This is not the face she should present to the Ghanaian voter and better still the political parties. Nobody gets a second chance to make a first impression. She has already cut for herself an unenviable impression and would have to work extra hard to reverse it lest she suffers a turbulent tenure.

She cannot claim to be immune to negative public opinion especially if this is consistent; and there is no reason to believe that would not be the case. We do not envy her at all. Starting on an Afari-Djan note is not good enough. Has she been infected so soon?