body-container-line-1
25.07.2014 Press Release

Climate Change, Foreign Assistance And Food Sovereignty In Ghana

By Food Sovereignty Ghana
Climate Change, Foreign Assistance And Food Sovereignty In Ghana
25.07.2014 LISTEN

Recent reports on climate change have continuously stressed the unequal burden small states experience in comparison to their relatively low energy consumption. For many developing and low-income nations, this imbalanced and undue drain is the continuance of ongoing historical injustices.


In countries like Ghana, environmental destruction by foreign forces is no recent phenomenon. For hundreds of years mineral extraction has laid waste to Ghanaian soil and its forests have been at the mercy of the timber market. Extraction has taken the form of gold, oil, bodies, and more.

Moreover, many land preservation schemes have been at the behest of Western intermediaries. Thus, many 'green' projects, be they conservation or eco-tourism, have revolved around Western logic and development discourses, which often frame problems 'in tightly defined, bounded terms that suggest logical, linear solutions, strategies and methods used to achieve scientific objectivity (Johnson 1995, p. 115). Approaching environmental conservation from a Western and development standpoint not only infers the use of capitalist logics, but also creates what Barbara Rose Johnson calls a 'conceptual distancing mechanism' (1995, p. 115), framing conservation in scientific, objective and achievable terms. Oftentimes such distancing is without regard to the human systems and ecosystems implicated in conservation efforts.

Amidst the list of consequences of climate change are increased climate irregularities, droughts, warmer temperatures and, as such, food insecurity. In order to tackle current and future uncertainties, scientists and development practitioners are searching for ways to strengthen crop resilience and reduce risks to farmers.

One solution that has been proposed is the use of genetically modified (GM) and genetically engineered (GE) seeds. Companies such as Monsanto, DuPont and Syngenta are creating seeds that are meant to weather climate crises and are promoted under the promise of Africa's 'green revolution' (Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa).

The push for genetically engineered approaches to agricultural challenges is largely a Western effort, backed by big-name actors such as the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Bono's ONE campaign and Millennium Villages (Mittal and Moore 2009, p. 2). Accordingly, the United States incorporates GM seeds in their agricultural and food aid programs.

Currently, Ghana is one of 19 countries receiving assistance from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)'s newest food security venture, Feed the Future. USAID is promoting GM seeds and technology as innovative, smart products that 'incorporate tolerance to disease, heat, and drought [in order] to increase production while maintaining or improving the nutritional quality of food' (USAID).

While at first glance modified seeds and improved crops appear to be a productive way to tackle agricultural insecurities, a large debate is taking place over the use of biotechnology. Recently, adversaries have called for a more holistic approach to address hunger and have 'concluded that agriculture policy and practice must be changed to [also] address poverty, social inequalities, and environmental sustainability' (Mittal and Moore 2009, p. 1). The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development reported that 'GM crops are unlikely to play a substantial role in addressing the needs of poor farmers' (Mittal and Moore 200, p.1).

In Ghana, the anti-GMO movement is led by Food Sovereignty Ghana (FSG). The organization's focus is multifaceted, having grown out of conversation surrounding the increasing phenomenon of land grabs, the right to water and sanitation as a fundamental human right, water privatization issues, deforestation, climate change, carbon trading and Africa's atmospheric space, and in particular, the urgent issue of the introduction of GM food technology ('About Us').

Core to FSG's work is public education and placing pressure on the government to enact a moratorium on GM seeds. Along with allies, FSG and their wide coalition have testified before parliament, penned editorials and articles for Ghanaian print media, appeared on television and radio shows, organized protests, and regularly worked across civil and political sectors to build partnerships and alliances. This past summer FSG turned down an invitation to the American embassy to discuss biotechnology, citing that the closed-door nature of the meeting was not conducive to engaging public conversation around the matter.

Similarly to Krista Harper's Hungarian subjects, FSG's concerns partially 'stem from a growing awareness that integration into the global economy [renders postcolonial] countries vulnerable to environmental degradation and other risks' (Harper 200, p. 230). Of course, environmental dilapidation for profit is nothing new, yet its continuance is magnified in the current globalized, hyper-capitalist economy. Moreover, for FSG, Western encroachment on food sovereignty is a perpetuation of the colonial past. GE technology is colonial partially in that it 'foster[s] dependency on a corporate, [foreign] seed supply' (Mittal and Moore 2009, p. 34). In order to emphasize the coloniality of GM food aid, FSG regularly uses terms such as 'genetically modified colonialism' to invoke colonial imaginations. Hence, the struggle against GM seeds and technology is much larger than addressing food safety: it is about moving towards true post-colonial independence.

FSG is not alone. The Oakland Institute explains that 'Africa has been largely united against GM crops, [choosing] to protect biodiversity over accepting GM food aid' (Mittal and Moore 2009, p. 7). Thus, a conundrum arises: is USAID obligated to revise its programming if the host country rejects its means of implementation? In this case, if Ghanaian farmers do not want to use genetically modified seeds, are they automatically disqualified from USAID assistance, or does USAID have a mandate/obligation to work with them in other ways?

African actors have continually emphasized rights to their land, crops, and foodways, arguing that food security, sovereignty and development require structural changes. Such an undertaking does not necessarily correlate with development aid programs, and hence requires reorientation amongst major development practitioners like USAID, the Gates Foundation, AGRA and the World Bank. Moreover, such debates call on governments to pass legislation that protects its farmers, people, and food systems, and that places value on national wants over foreign companies.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Food Sovereignty Ghana (2013) 'About Us', http://foodsovereigntyghana.org/about-us/, accessed 5 December, 2013

Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (2013) http://www.agra.org/, accessed 8 December 2013

Harper, K. (2005) ''Wild Capitalism' and 'Ecocolonialism': A Tale of Two Rivers', American Anthropologist, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 221233

Johnson, B.R. (1995) 'Human Rights and the Environment', Human Ecology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 111123

Mittal, A. and Moore, M. (eds) (2009) Voices from Africa: African Farmers and Environmentalists Speak out Against a New Green Revolution in Africa, Oakland, The Oakland Institute

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2012) 'Climate Change and Food Security', http://tinyurl.com/k5rzdcb

* Joeva Rock is a PhD student in the Department of Anthropology at American University in Washington, DC, focusing on colonial legacies in West Africa. Follow her on twitter: @southsidetrees

* THE VIEWS OF THE ABOVE ARTICLE ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR/S AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE PAMBAZUKA NEWS EDITORIAL TEAM

* BROUGHT TO YOU BY PAMBAZUKA NEWS
* Please do not take Pambazuka for granted! Become a Friend of Pambazuka and make a donation NOW to help keep Pambazuka FREE and INDEPENDENT!

* Please send comments to editor[at]pambazuka[dot]org or comment online at Pambazuka News.

Source: http://pambazuka.org/en/category/features/92585

For Life, the Environment, and Social Justice!
Social Media Outreach
Pan-Africanist International - a grammar of Pan-Africanism and its manners of articulation.

Website: http://www.panafricanistinternational.org/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/PanAfricanists
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pan-Africanist-International/

body-container-line